bmk1245 Posted December 2, 2017 #176 Share Posted December 2, 2017 On 11/22/2017 at 9:14 AM, Weitter Duckss said: I'm not dealing with claims and hypotheses. I just use all (me) available data in one place. Hypotheses and bad claims are my food. (S Cassiopeiae 3,5-10 M Sun, Radius 930 R Sun, Temperature 1.800 K) (Gliese 777, 0,09 M Sun, 5.417°K) (ROXs 42Bb, 9 Mass of Jupiter, 2650 ± 100°K, distance 100 AU) [...] Again, how Jupiter rotation velocity fits your theory? On 11/22/2017 at 9:14 AM, Weitter Duckss said: [...] Rotation is all present in the universe. Rotation begins with proton due to imbalance + and - charge and particle relief (see atom). Cyclone is over 99, ..% only rotation product. It is seldom a source of rotation. [...] What the **** you are talking about? Spin of electron, proton, etc, has nothing to do with rotation. On 11/22/2017 at 9:14 AM, Weitter Duckss said: [...]. If there is no other force, rotation would exist because of the constant circle of the body around the star. Without the orbit of the rotacoy would result from the rotation of the galaxy,[...] The only force keeping stars/galaxies rotating is conservation of angular momentum. Have you heard about it? I'd say, no. You are clueless about the issue as a doorbell hanging on the rotten jamb. On 11/22/2017 at 9:14 AM, Weitter Duckss said: [...] Cyclones (friction, layers of matter within the body), in 96.15% of the total amount of stars in Milky Way, do not play a key role (cyclones are a star rotation product, mostly). … from earlier http://phys.org/news/2015-10-scientists-rocky-planets-pebbles.html Do you have any clue what that article is about?! Huh?! Seriously, if you got your head injured during balkan kerfuffle, maybe you should stay away from science. Thats not your horsy. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weitter Duckss Posted December 3, 2017 Author #177 Share Posted December 3, 2017 12 hours ago, bmk1245 said: Again, how Jupiter rotation velocity fits your theory? What the **** you are talking about? Spin of electron, proton, etc, has nothing to do with rotation. The only force keeping stars/galaxies rotating is conservation of angular momentum. Have you heard about it? I'd say, no. You are clueless about the issue as a doorbell hanging on the rotten jamb. Do you have any clue what that article is about?! Huh?! Seriously, if you got your head injured during balkan kerfuffle, maybe you should stay away from science. Thats not your horsy. Period. There are people who work and create. There are also those others who think they are (copying other people's knowledge) the smartest and now spitting on everything they can. -Jupiter is a body of small masses (small pressure forces), small binary effects (a small radius) whose rotation speed created a molten core. We discussed this. With Jupiter, all right, check with yourself. -Mass of body is sum of particles and sum of all rotations of the whole. Who speaks about one particle? - What is the "conservation of angular momentum"? Is this God a work? I was close to opening a new topic, but your thinking ("horseback"), is it, postponed. (How are the spiral and other types of galaxies formed? Parody) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmk1245 Posted December 3, 2017 #178 Share Posted December 3, 2017 2 hours ago, Weitter Duckss said: There are people who work and create. There are also those others who think they are (copying other people's knowledge) the smartest and now spitting on everything they can.[...] The only work you've done, was reposting data from wikipedia. Not to mention that your claim "radiation does not decrease with the square of the distance" (from here) invalidates data from wikipedia you are using for your "theory" (see mass - luminosity relation). 2 hours ago, Weitter Duckss said: [...] -Jupiter is a body of small masses (small pressure forces), small binary effects (a small radius) whose rotation speed created a molten core. We discussed this. With Jupiter, all right, check with yourself. [...] Blah, blah, blah. Your own words "The faster rotation creates more matter friction inside the object, which results in a higher temperature and stronger magnetic field" (from here). Jupiter rotates waaay faster than the Sun. Why Jupiter is much colder than the Sun, huh? 2 hours ago, Weitter Duckss said: [...] -Mass of body is sum of particles and sum of all rotations of the whole. Who speaks about one particle? [...] You are (from here): "Rotation begins with proton due to imbalance" 2 hours ago, Weitter Duckss said: [...] - What is the "conservation of angular momentum"? Is this God a work? [...] Never heard of that? Here yea go: conservation of angular momentum. 2 hours ago, Weitter Duckss said: [...] I was close to opening a new topic, but your thinking ("horseback"), is it, postponed. (How are the spiral and other types of galaxies formed? Parody) Please, don't... Don't embarrass yourself. Single amoeba knows more about star evolution than you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weitter Duckss Posted December 3, 2017 Author #179 Share Posted December 3, 2017 9 hours ago, bmk1245 said: The only work you've done, was reposting data from wikipedia. Not to mention that your claim "radiation does not decrease with the square of the distance" (from here) invalidates data from wikipedia you are using for your "theory" (see mass - luminosity relation). Blah, blah, blah. Your own words "The faster rotation creates more matter friction inside the object, which results in a higher temperature and stronger magnetic field" (from here). Jupiter rotates waaay faster than the Sun. Why Jupiter is much colder than the Sun, huh? You are (from here): "Rotation begins with proton due to imbalance" Never heard of that? Here yea go: conservation of angular momentum. Please, don't... Don't embarrass yourself. Single amoeba knows more about star evolution than you. “The value a = 3.5 is commonly used for main-sequence stars. This equation and the usual value of a = 3.5 only applies to main-sequence stars with masses 2M⊙ < M < 20M⊙ and does not apply to red giants or white dwarfs. As a star approaches the Eddington Luminosity then a = 1.” From your Link Dementi HD 149382 0,29-0,53 35,500 ± 500 PG0112 + 104 0,5 30.000 Star Mass Sun 1 Temperature K HD 149382 0,29-0,53 35.500±500 PG0112+104 0,5 30.000 40 Eridani B 0,5 16.500 Lacaillea 9352 0,503 3.626 L 97-12 0,59 5.700 ±90 Zeta Cygni B 0,6 12.000 Procion B 0,6 7.740 Van Maanen 2 0,68 6.220 HD 4628 0,7 5.829 G29-38 0,7 11.820 Sun 1 5.772 Sirius B 0,98 25.200 Gamma Piscium 1,03 4.885 Arcturus 1,08 4.286 VX Sagittarii 12 2.400 – 3.300 Antares 12,4 3.400 E Canis Majoris 12,6 22.900 μ Columbae 16 33.000 WR 2 16 141.000 VY Canis Majoris 17 3.490 Α Crucis α1 17,8 24.000 WR 102 19 210.000 WR 134 19 63.100 Deneb 19 8.525 η Canis Majores 19,19 15.000 Mu Cephei 19,2 3.750 HD 21389 19,3 9.730 WR 46 25 112.000 S Monocerotis 29,1 38.500 MU Normea 33,3 28.500 QU Normea 43 17.000 NML Cygni 50 3.834 Evidence, not Wikipedia as Wikipedia. -”-Jupiter is a body of small masses (small pressure forces), small binary effects (a small radius) whose rotation speed created a molten core.” From your link: “The mass which creates pressure and the effects of the gravitational forces of Sun are responsible for the melted core. That is the reason why Venus is more warm than Earth and has more active volcanoes, although it is smaller than Earth 6. .. If there are two stars with the same mass and different speeds of rotation, the star that rotates faster is warmer. .. It is enough to observe the mass of an object, its relation to other objects, the rotation of an object as well as the rotation of a central object, the composition of an object and the orbital distance to make a valid estimate for every object, without the need for nuclear fusions, fissions and matter combustion. + Reassessment-of-the-old-but-still-employed-theories-of-Universe ..” -( conservation of angular momentum.) A wonderful article, stars and skaters. Stars sling, sing, talk, ... Completely identical and contemporary. -If you are "single amoeba" and you "knows more about star evolution than you." so far, it you do not show it. Could you surprise me with a link to your articles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmk1245 Posted December 3, 2017 #180 Share Posted December 3, 2017 6 minutes ago, Weitter Duckss said: “The value a = 3.5 is commonly used for main-sequence stars. This equation and the usual value of a = 3.5 only applies to main-sequence stars with masses 2M⊙ < M < 20M⊙ and does not apply to red giants or white dwarfs. As a star approaches the Eddington Luminosity then a = 1.” From your Link Dementi HD 149382 0,29-0,53 35,500 ± 500 PG0112 + 104 0,5 30.000 Star Mass Sun 1 Temperature K HD 149382 0,29-0,53 35.500±500 PG0112+104 0,5 30.000 40 Eridani B 0,5 16.500 Lacaillea 9352 0,503 3.626 L 97-12 0,59 5.700 ±90 Zeta Cygni B 0,6 12.000 Procion B 0,6 7.740 Van Maanen 2 0,68 6.220 HD 4628 0,7 5.829 G29-38 0,7 11.820 Sun 1 5.772 Sirius B 0,98 25.200 Gamma Piscium 1,03 4.885 Arcturus 1,08 4.286 VX Sagittarii 12 2.400 – 3.300 Antares 12,4 3.400 E Canis Majoris 12,6 22.900 μ Columbae 16 33.000 WR 2 16 141.000 VY Canis Majoris 17 3.490 Α Crucis α1 17,8 24.000 WR 102 19 210.000 WR 134 19 63.100 Deneb 19 8.525 η Canis Majores 19,19 15.000 Mu Cephei 19,2 3.750 HD 21389 19,3 9.730 WR 46 25 112.000 S Monocerotis 29,1 38.500 MU Normea 33,3 28.500 QU Normea 43 17.000 NML Cygni 50 3.834 Evidence, not Wikipedia as Wikipedia. -”-Jupiter is a body of small masses (small pressure forces), small binary effects (a small radius) whose rotation speed created a molten core.” From your link: “The mass which creates pressure and the effects of the gravitational forces of Sun are responsible for the melted core. That is the reason why Venus is more warm than Earth and has more active volcanoes, although it is smaller than Earth 6. .. If there are two stars with the same mass and different speeds of rotation, the star that rotates faster is warmer. .. It is enough to observe the mass of an object, its relation to other objects, the rotation of an object as well as the rotation of a central object, the composition of an object and the orbital distance to make a valid estimate for every object, without the need for nuclear fusions, fissions and matter combustion. + Reassessment-of-the-old-but-still-employed-theories-of-Universe ..” -( conservation of angular momentum.) A wonderful article, stars and skaters. Stars sling, sing, talk, ... Completely identical and contemporary. -If you are "single amoeba" and you "knows more about star evolution than you." so far, it you do not show it. Could you surprise me with a link to your articles? For f's sake, why Jupiter is significantly colder than the Sun, while rotating much faster than the Sun? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weitter Duckss Posted December 4, 2017 Author #181 Share Posted December 4, 2017 (edited) On 03. 12. 2017. at 9:12 PM, bmk1245 said: For f's sake, why Jupiter is significantly colder than the Sun, while rotating much faster than the Sun? It's simple. Jupiter is not a star yet (maybe it can be classified as a dwarf braon). The body must meet several conditions: sufficient mass, rotation speed and binary effects. Jupiter does not have enough mass and has no significant binary effects. Regardless of the current speed of rotation, he has not yet passed the star qualification. If Jupiter had the same mass and similar binary effects as the Sun, the jupiter would have a temperature above 30,000 ° K. Conversely, slow rotation gives "S Cassiopeiae 3.5-10 M Sun, Radius 930 R Sun, Temperature 1.800 K". Sufficient pressure forces create a hot body. If the body has a faster rotation, the temperature rises, the same contributions and binary effects. Or faster rotation and more significant binary effects contribute to the body becoming a star at a smaller mass. See the planet table and braon dwarf. Interesting system Wolf 359 0,09 2.800 ± 100 and its companion b, mass 3-10 MJ, 1.600 ° K, distance from the parent star ~40,6 AU. This is all written in articles and my comments. Edited December 4, 2017 by Weitter Duckss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toast Posted December 4, 2017 #182 Share Posted December 4, 2017 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Weitter Duckss said: Jupiter is not a star yet And will never be. Quote (maybe it can be classified as a dwarf braon). If you meant brown dwarf: no, it cant. But your comment made it clear that you are a copy&paste hero without any understanding of the matter. Edited December 4, 2017 by toast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weitter Duckss Posted December 5, 2017 Author #183 Share Posted December 5, 2017 16 hours ago, toast said: And will never be. If you meant brown dwarf: no, it cant. But your comment made it clear that you are a copy&paste hero without any understanding of the matter. „Despite this, Jupiter still radiates more heat than it receives from the Sun; the amount of heat produced inside it is similar to the total solar radiation it receives .. The process of further shrinkage with increasing mass would continue until appreciable stellar ignition was achieved, as in high-mass brown dwarfs…” Wikipedia My texts slowly enter the basics of physics, whether you want it or not. Formerly it was heresy, today only stubborn individuals walk the footsteps of the ancient Greeks. Through time, all official texts will be copies of my texts. If you want to keep up to date with the latest knowledge, read my articles carefully. Without them, in the Universe, is official laughs and stories without cover. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essan Posted December 5, 2017 #184 Share Posted December 5, 2017 54 minutes ago, Weitter Duckss said: Formerly it was heresy, today only stubborn individuals walk the footsteps of the ancient Greeks. Through time, all official texts will be copies of my texts. If you want to keep up to date with the latest knowledge, read my articles carefully. Without them, in the Universe, is official laughs and stories without cover. Such a humble man ....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waspie_Dwarf Posted December 5, 2017 #185 Share Posted December 5, 2017 30 minutes ago, Essan said: Such a humble man ....... A legend in his own mind. The wisdom of the Greeks was superceded slowly by geniuses, not by random individuals making crap up. There are those that think Weitter Duckss is a genius, and then there those that aren't Weitter Duckss. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toast Posted December 5, 2017 #186 Share Posted December 5, 2017 2 hours ago, Weitter Duckss said: My texts slowly enter the basics of physics, whether you want it or not. I know very well how slowly the basics of physics enter your mind, obviously they dont enter it at all. But anyway, even the quoted WiKi article, which you obviously didnt understood, will not change the fact that Jupiter isnt, has ever been or will ever be a star. And no, I will not give you the explanation what a star is. Quote Formerly it was heresy, today only stubborn individuals walk the footsteps of the ancient Greeks. Through time, all official texts will be copies of my texts. Of course, your texts will be coppied but for other reasons than you think. Quote If you want to keep up to date with the latest knowledge, read my articles carefully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weitter Duckss Posted December 5, 2017 Author #187 Share Posted December 5, 2017 6 hours ago, Essan said: Such a humble man ....... I'm always modest. Not modestly, is that I will be someone and some or alpha and omega in this area. Still, I see what direction they have taken official newspapers, theft, plundering, alienation and pretend silly. Eh, that laws must respect all and apply to all equally. It would not have been that Galileo invented a telescope, that Hubbel designed the expansion of the universe, etc. (Interesting "new savvy", post-published articles:https://www.academia.edu/…/Why_Mars_has_no_atmosphere_like_… andhttps://www.academia.edu/…/Using_tales_in_science_to_acquir… More interesting is where the article was published. "They are dark streaks that extend gradually downhill in warm seasons, then fade away in winter and reappear the next year." On Earth is H2O, on Mars is CO2. In the winter, freezes and covers the stripes, in the summer it sublimates."Recurring martian streaks: flowing sand, not water? Dark features on Mars previously considered evidence for subsurface flowing of water are interpreted by new research as granular flows, where grains of sand and dust slip downhill to make dark streaks, rather than the ground being darkened by seeping… PHYS.ORG") Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Noteverythingisaconspiracy Posted December 5, 2017 #188 Share Posted December 5, 2017 10 hours ago, Weitter Duckss said: My texts slowly enter the basics of physics, whether you want it or not. Formerly it was heresy, today only stubborn individuals walk the footsteps of the ancient Greeks. Through time, all official texts will be copies of my texts. Did Weitter Duckss just make the funniest post of 2017 ? I think its a jolly good candidate. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weitter Duckss Posted December 6, 2017 Author #189 Share Posted December 6, 2017 8 hours ago, Noteverythingisaconspiracy said: Did Weitter Duckss just make the funniest post of 2017 ? I think its a jolly good candidate. Your have many, all together offer zero counter evidence. I feel like I'm on the green market among crones. Ladies and gentlemen, you have at your disposal all the knowledge of the world. Wikipedia, Wikiwand, Britannica, Exoplanet, Archive, professional magazines etc. Do you know (probably) read in the surf. People says: when there is no evidence and arguments, then moving: noise, insults .... Without evidence, it is a competition of empty heads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmk1245 Posted December 7, 2017 #190 Share Posted December 7, 2017 On 12/4/2017 at 10:19 PM, Weitter Duckss said: [...] The body must meet several conditions: sufficient mass, rotation speed and binary effects. [...] OK, how much energy Sun generates due to: 1) mass; 2) rotation speed; 3) binary effects (whatever you mean by that)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weitter Duckss Posted December 7, 2017 Author #191 Share Posted December 7, 2017 6 hours ago, bmk1245 said: OK, how much energy Sun generates due to: 1) mass; 2) rotation speed; 3) binary effects (whatever you mean by that)? I work relationships. The body (can that it shines) glows at the mass Star Mass M Sun Temperature K 2M1207 ~0,025 2550 ± 150 Teide 1 0,052 2600 ± 150 VHS 1256-1257 0,07-0,015 2.620 ± 140 Van Biesbroeck's star 0,075> 2.600 DENIS 1048-1039 0,075> 2.200 Teegarden's Star 0,08 2.637 DX Cancri 0,09 2.840 TVLM 513-46546 0,09 2.500 Wolf 359 0,09 2,800 ± 100 Or Planet, brown dwarf Mass of Jupiter Temperature K Distance AU GQ Lupi b 1-36 2650 ± 100 100 ROXs 42Bb 9 1,950-2,000 157 HD 106906 b 11 1.800 ~650 DH Tauri b 12 2.750 330 CT Chamaeleontis b 10,5-17 2.500 440 HD 44627 13-14 1.600-2.400 275 1RXS 1609 b 14 1.800 330 UScoCTIO 108 b 14 2.600 670 Oph 11 B 21 2.478 243 HIP 78530 b 24 2.700 740 Sun has (of course) a mass of 1.00. Binary effects (Pluto / Sharon, two stars in close proximity, parent body and body in orbit ...) and rotation further determine body temperature. Relationships means: taking a large number of individuals and determining the correctness of determining the behavior of the sampled body. In one word: the universe statistics. G 5,200–6,000 K yellow yellowish white 0.8–1.04 M☉ 0.96–1.15 R☉ 0.6–1.5 L☉ Weak 7.6% K 3,700–5,200 K light orange pale yellow orange 0.45–0.8 M☉ 0.7–0.96 R☉ 0.08–0.6 L☉ Very weak 12.1% M 2,400–3,700 K orange red light orange red 0.08–0.45 M☉ ≤ 0.7 R☉ ≤ 0.08 L☉ Very weak 76.45% https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_classification#Harvard_spectral_classification Or “from the total amount of stars in Milky Way, 96,15% are the stars of the classes M, K and G with low temperatures, up to ~ 6.000 K.” If focus, the universe, "no" are important individual cases and numbers associated with that body. It swallowed a large number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toast Posted December 7, 2017 #192 Share Posted December 7, 2017 36 minutes ago, Weitter Duckss said: If focus, the universe, "no" are important individual cases and numbers associated with that body. It swallowed a large number. What? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waspie_Dwarf Posted December 7, 2017 #193 Share Posted December 7, 2017 On 12/5/2017 at 7:55 PM, Weitter Duckss said: It would not have been that Galileo invented a telescope, You can't even get this correct. Galileo DID NOT invent the telescope, he was, however, one of the first to record astronomical observations using a telescope. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek Willis Posted December 7, 2017 #194 Share Posted December 7, 2017 1 hour ago, Waspie_Dwarf said: You can't even get this correct. Galileo DID NOT invent the telescope, he was, however, one of the first to record astronomical observations using a telescope. Yes, but when all official texts become copies of Weitter's texts Galileo will be credited as the inventor of the telescope. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waspie_Dwarf Posted December 7, 2017 #195 Share Posted December 7, 2017 2 minutes ago, Derek Willis said: Yes, but when all official texts become copies of Weitter's texts Galileo will be credited as the inventor of the telescope. That will be the day that science dies and bovine faeces become the new measure of genius. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Noteverythingisaconspiracy Posted December 7, 2017 #196 Share Posted December 7, 2017 25 minutes ago, Waspie_Dwarf said: That will be the day that science dies and bovine faeces become the new measure of genius. Unfortunately I see more and more examples that we are moving in that direction. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek Willis Posted December 7, 2017 #197 Share Posted December 7, 2017 5 hours ago, Waspie_Dwarf said: That will be the day that science dies and bovine faeces become the new measure of genius. It is an irony Weitter chose to mention Galileo, a man to whom truth an integrity mattered. So much so he would only recant his "blasphemy" when shown the instruments of torture, and who spent the remainder of his life under house arrest. And who indeed - had Weitter bothered to look it up - described his excitement when he learned about a "viewing tube" made by an optician in Flanders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weitter Duckss Posted December 8, 2017 Author #198 Share Posted December 8, 2017 5 hours ago, Derek Willis said: It is an irony Weitter chose to mention Galileo, a man to whom truth an integrity mattered. So much so he would only recant his "blasphemy" when shown the instruments of torture, and who spent the remainder of his life under house arrest. And who indeed - had Weitter bothered to look it up - described his excitement when he learned about a "viewing tube" made by an optician in Flanders. Wonderfully. ?Today laws allow theft and legalize everything that was acquired by theft. Should all be excited when they gain the benefit of stolen things? Who normal, glorify thieves? Maybe Hubbell (Theory of Expansion of the Universe)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmk1245 Posted December 8, 2017 #199 Share Posted December 8, 2017 16 hours ago, Weitter Duckss said: I work relationships. The body (can that it shines) glows at the mass Star Mass M Sun Temperature K 2M1207 ~0,025 2550 ± 150 Teide 1 0,052 2600 ± 150 VHS 1256-1257 0,07-0,015 2.620 ± 140 Van Biesbroeck's star 0,075> 2.600 DENIS 1048-1039 0,075> 2.200 Teegarden's Star 0,08 2.637 DX Cancri 0,09 2.840 TVLM 513-46546 0,09 2.500 Wolf 359 0,09 2,800 ± 100 Or Planet, brown dwarf Mass of Jupiter Temperature K Distance AU GQ Lupi b 1-36 2650 ± 100 100 ROXs 42Bb 9 1,950-2,000 157 HD 106906 b 11 1.800 ~650 DH Tauri b 12 2.750 330 CT Chamaeleontis b 10,5-17 2.500 440 HD 44627 13-14 1.600-2.400 275 1RXS 1609 b 14 1.800 330 UScoCTIO 108 b 14 2.600 670 Oph 11 B 21 2.478 243 HIP 78530 b 24 2.700 740 Sun has (of course) a mass of 1.00. Binary effects (Pluto / Sharon, two stars in close proximity, parent body and body in orbit ...) and rotation further determine body temperature. Relationships means: taking a large number of individuals and determining the correctness of determining the behavior of the sampled body. In one word: the universe statistics. G 5,200–6,000 K yellow yellowish white 0.8–1.04 M☉ 0.96–1.15 R☉ 0.6–1.5 L☉ Weak 7.6% K 3,700–5,200 K light orange pale yellow orange 0.45–0.8 M☉ 0.7–0.96 R☉ 0.08–0.6 L☉ Very weak 12.1% M 2,400–3,700 K orange red light orange red 0.08–0.45 M☉ ≤ 0.7 R☉ ≤ 0.08 L☉ Very weak 76.45% https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_classification#Harvard_spectral_classification Or “from the total amount of stars in Milky Way, 96,15% are the stars of the classes M, K and G with low temperatures, up to ~ 6.000 K.” If focus, the universe, "no" are important individual cases and numbers associated with that body. It swallowed a large number. OK, how much energy Pluto and Charon radiates due to: 1) mass; 2) rotation speed; 3) binary effects? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmk1245 Posted December 8, 2017 #200 Share Posted December 8, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, Weitter Duckss said: Wonderfully. ?Today laws allow theft and legalize everything that was acquired by theft. Should all be excited when they gain the benefit of stolen things? Who normal, glorify thieves? Maybe Hubbell (Theory of Expansion of the Universe)? Correlation between stellar rotation and temperature was known long before you made "ground breaking discovery". That makes you a thief. Edited December 8, 2017 by bmk1245 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now