bmk1245 Posted May 20, 2018 #326 Share Posted May 20, 2018 2 minutes ago, danydandan said: I only glanced at the article, didn't bother looking through it as well it's in a language I can't read. I'll scroll down and look for equations. Don't waste your time. First equation tells all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weitter Duckss Posted May 20, 2018 Author #327 Share Posted May 20, 2018 (edited) 10 hours ago, danydandan said: Not as closely as I should, what have the results if CERN stated regarding your theory. It is important from Collider, a proton decays. The breakthrough (ultimately simplified) flows over .. mionees, the mions disintegrate at evv (100%). If the proton in disintegration in the end residues has evv, how can we exclude evv in the proton formation? New theories arise when existing theories are not good (they do not respond to the truth, but they push them persistently). Theory observes visible (physical) matter without the need to define the space. Galaxies are moving away from each other (we know that this is not the whole truth) and there is no need for space interference. Alexander claims to be an amateur. I can add, amateur who has invested much effort in the theory. New face and new ideas should be welcomed. Edited May 20, 2018 by Weitter Duckss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danydandan Posted May 20, 2018 #328 Share Posted May 20, 2018 5 minutes ago, bmk1245 said: Don't waste your time. First equation tells all. Yeap seen it now, waste of time if your basing a premise of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmk1245 Posted May 20, 2018 #329 Share Posted May 20, 2018 23 minutes ago, danydandan said: Yeap seen it now, waste of time if your basing a premise of that. Once "theory" starts with such blunder, you can skip the rest, for sure. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beard_new Posted May 20, 2018 #330 Share Posted May 20, 2018 (edited) 11 hours ago, bmk1245 said: Funny thing, Duckss brought link to pure BS. First equation proves that: left side - energy, right side - energy divided by velocity squared. Dimensional analysis should be the first lesson in physics class. There is no mistake in the formula! Speed is relative to the speed of light and is dimensionless (u/c). It is better to read from the beginning. There is an explanation of terms and principles. By going to the main page the main page, you can turn on the English translation (on the left), then in the menu on top of TIPS. Edited May 20, 2018 by beard_new Refinement 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beard_new Posted May 20, 2018 #331 Share Posted May 20, 2018 On http://www.newtheory.ru so do not consider. And they try to observe the rules of communication there. Calm down and do not be nervous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danydandan Posted May 20, 2018 #332 Share Posted May 20, 2018 1 hour ago, beard_new said: On http://www.newtheory.ru so do not consider. And they try to observe the rules of communication there. Calm down and do not be nervous. Maybe something is lost in translation, but you need to reconsider a number if assumptions made in theory, specifically your mathematical proofs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beard_new Posted May 20, 2018 #333 Share Posted May 20, 2018 19 minutes ago, danydandan said: Maybe something is lost in translation, but you need to reconsider a number if assumptions made in theory, specifically your mathematical proofs. Thank you! I will try to make a normal translation. The main thing is that the article is available to many. At the Russian forum is quite an adequate discussion. I will translate in parts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danydandan Posted May 20, 2018 #334 Share Posted May 20, 2018 3 minutes ago, beard_new said: Thank you! I will try to make a normal translation. The main thing is that the article is available to many. At the Russian forum is quite an adequate discussion. I will translate in parts. I used Google translate by copying and pasting I don't know if it's a Google issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beard_new Posted May 20, 2018 #335 Share Posted May 20, 2018 1 minute ago, danydandan said: I used Google translate by copying and pasting I don't know if it's a Google issue. Google translate does not always translate correctly what is not standard for the language. Even for Russian speakers, I had to explain the terms. Now there is something to work on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmk1245 Posted May 20, 2018 #336 Share Posted May 20, 2018 4 hours ago, danydandan said: Maybe something is lost in translation, but you need to reconsider a number if assumptions made in theory, specifically your mathematical proofs. BS can't be lost in translation. The guy is just another Petrik. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weitter Duckss Posted May 20, 2018 Author #337 Share Posted May 20, 2018 4 hours ago, beard_new said: Google translate does not always translate correctly what is not standard for the language. Even for Russian speakers, I had to explain the terms. Now there is something to work on „2. Moment of inertia. The moment of inertia is determined by the nature of its own rotation of object movement and their gyroscopic properties.“ Explain this to concrete examples from the Universe. For example: why only 0.00003% of the stars (main sequence) have very large rotation (and high temperature), compared to 96.15% of the classes M, K and G with low temperatures and slow rotation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beard_new Posted May 20, 2018 #338 Share Posted May 20, 2018 1 hour ago, Weitter Duckss said: Explain this to concrete examples from the Universe. For example: why only 0.00003% of the stars (main sequence) have very large rotation (and high temperature), compared to 96.15% of the classes M, K and G with low temperatures and slow rotation. The main sequence is the region on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram containing stars whose energy source is the thermonuclear reaction of helium synthesis from hydrogen. What does the moment of inertia have? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beard_new Posted May 21, 2018 #339 Share Posted May 21, 2018 Discussion at the forum gave me an idea of the further development path. There is one important (from my point of view) observation. I'm not sure that one day my work will become widely known (there is little professionalism, and there is not much time), but I am sure that my ideas have a rational grain. Therefore, if someone decides to use this grain in their work, I will not have any claims, I will not require the mention of my name. Of course, I will continue to work on the theory. But it's just my pleasure. Ideas can be born in a single head, but should belong to everyone if they are useful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weitter Duckss Posted May 21, 2018 Author #340 Share Posted May 21, 2018 9 hours ago, beard_new said: The main sequence is the region on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram containing stars whose energy source is the thermonuclear reaction of helium synthesis from hydrogen. What does the moment of inertia have? I agree that work should always be developed. In the diagram, the star rotation grows from right to left. I generally use in discussing all the stars and other bodies. How Stars Create "Moment of Inertia," as you explain the difference in Moment of Inertia. "The speed of light measured in SN is always equal to constant C = 1 according to the principle of its measurement." How to measure the measurement of light beyond the visible matter. If there is no light beyond the visible objects (the universe is black) your postulate then reads "Energy equal to zero corresponds to the absence of energy, mass equal to zero corresponds to the absence of mass. The speed corresponding to zero corresponds to the lack of movement. " The experiment with the enclosed room of the mirror shows:. Regardless of the show (strength, intensity, quantity) in the room, light and waves disappear with the termination of emissions "photons" and radiation. From my point of view, your postulate is correct. As you explain, the rest with photons and light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmk1245 Posted May 21, 2018 #341 Share Posted May 21, 2018 3 hours ago, beard_new said: Discussion at the forum gave me an idea of the further development path. There is one important (from my point of view) observation. I'm not sure that one day my work will become widely known (there is little professionalism, and there is not much time), but I am sure that my ideas have a rational grain. Therefore, if someone decides to use this grain in their work, I will not have any claims, I will not require the mention of my name. Of course, I will continue to work on the theory. But it's just my pleasure. Ideas can be born in a single head, but should belong to everyone if they are useful. Let me guess, your new idea is measuring length in kilograms? Brothers Lifshitz and Landau turn in their graves over your bs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmk1245 Posted May 21, 2018 #342 Share Posted May 21, 2018 Bit OT, Landau was brilliant scientist, but his humor takes the best: P: "Please draw me a circle" L draws a cross P: "Hm, now draw me a cross" L draws a circle P: "Landau, why don't you do what I ask?" L: "If I did, you might come to think I've become mentally retarded". (link) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weitter Duckss Posted May 23, 2018 Author #343 Share Posted May 23, 2018 The constant growth of the body becomes very popular. “The conclusion would be that it is a very complex and dynamic pattern related to the processes of objects' creation – it is constantly moving and growing. The complexity of objects is related to the space temperature, the mass of an object and the total sum of tidal forces. Furthermore, the complexity is influenced by the position of an object related to the planet, Sun, as well as the asteroid belt. The important role also belongs to time when object got captured, for how long the object had been near Sun (perihelion) and at what distance. The goal of this article is to eliminate the biblical-style of thinking of simultaneous creation of all objects and their inability to change during time, as well as to point out that everything could be explained by the already existing evidence and processes.“ from http://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/Universe-and-rotation.html#differences-in -structure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weitter Duckss Posted May 28, 2018 Author #344 Share Posted May 28, 2018 https://www.space.com/40643-first-interstellar-immigrant-asteroid-jupiter-orbit.html Articles continue. about the constant growth of bodies in the universe. In our discussion (4-5 years ago), there was a question of how the bodies could grow; to the size of Earth etc, when we have small bodies totaling 6% of Earth mass. In a short time (at the beginning of searching for such objects) we have an answer. https://www.space.com/40643-first-interstellar-immigrant-asteroid-jupiter-orbit.html, https://www.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/small-asteroid-or-comet-visits-from-beyond-the-solar-system „Within the growth of an object, some smaller object is starting a reaction when colliding with a star. If that should remain a rare event, it needs to be a specific event under the specific conditions. The only possible specificity is for that object (the errant objects, incoming from outside the Solar system) to arrive vertically onto one of the poles and to hit the opening of a cyclone that exists on the poles of stars. That way, it would get an opportunity to break into the interior of an object. Comet ISON is the evidence that objects with vertical trajectories really exist in the Universe.” http://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/the-Universe-rotating.html#12b Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weitter Duckss Posted May 29, 2018 Author #345 Share Posted May 29, 2018 I'm sorry, first link. it should have been https://www.space.com/40687-pluto-formation-1-billion-comets.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now