Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Inversion5

The Phenomena is Confirmed

350 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

stereologist
Just now, dirtierdragoon4 said:

You're not welcome.

I appreciate your inabilities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inversion5
Just now, stereologist said:

I appreciate your inabilities.

Nobody said I had any.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Herr Falukorv

I need some fries with all this salt.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stereologist
1 minute ago, dirtierdragoon4 said:

Nobody said I had any.

Why did you spam the thread with a pointless video?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inversion5
Just now, stereologist said:

Why did you spam the thread with a pointless video?

How do you know it's pointless?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stereologist
Just now, dirtierdragoon4 said:

How do you know it's pointless?

Your posts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inversion5
1 minute ago, stereologist said:

Your posts

Which ones? Let me guess, all of them :lol:

Edited by dirtierdragoon4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stereologist
Just now, dirtierdragoon4 said:

Which ones?

All referring to the video

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ChrLzs

Perhaps, dear readers, now might be the time to vote on closing this trainw er thread.

 

I vote thumbs down for delonge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inversion5
Just now, stereologist said:

All referring to the video

I can see this back an forth will take forever. You need to be more specific.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stereologist
Just now, dirtierdragoon4 said:

I can see this back an forth will take forever. You need to be more specific.

Why

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inversion5
Just now, ChrLzs said:

Perhaps, dear readers, now might be the time to vote on closing this trainw er thread.

 

I vote thumbs down for delonge.

We know you are not bashful in enlightening us. So please elaborate, if you want.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inversion5
1 minute ago, stereologist said:

Why

Because i have no idea what you are talking about. You know, use your quotes or more words with specificity.

Edited by dirtierdragoon4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stereologist
Just now, dirtierdragoon4 said:

Because i have no idea what you are talking about. You know, use your quotes or more words with specificity.

That sums it up - don't watch the video.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inversion5
2 minutes ago, stereologist said:

That sums it up - don't watch the video.

You know I do not care if you or other people watch the/a video - just look at other posts on this topic I have made about how much I care about that. And again, what video :lol: Like, seriously.

Edited by dirtierdragoon4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stereologist
Just now, dirtierdragoon4 said:

You know I do not care if you or other people watch the video - just look at other posts on this topic I have made about how much I care about that.

I ask " Please explain why anyone should watch the video " and all I get is BS which is probably more intelligent than the video itself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inversion5
7 minutes ago, stereologist said:

I ask " Please explain why anyone should watch the video " and all I get is BS which is probably more intelligent than the video itself.

:lol: You wouldn't know would you. I did not post a video, I posted a link to the Delonge's Coalition of Interest website that does have a video in it. I actually meant to post a link to the main page of the Coalition of Interest website but settled for that specific web page. I figured people would click around, if they were interested of course. Are you here just to antagonize me? If you have no interest in watching a ufo/uap or participating in any fashionable way, why are you here? 

Edited by dirtierdragoon4
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stereologist
3 minutes ago, dirtierdragoon4 said:

:lol: You wouldn't know would you. I did not post a video, I posted a link to the Delonge's Coalition of Interest website that does have a video in it. I actually meant to post a link to the main page of the Coalition of Interest website but settled for that specific web page. I figured people would click around, if they were interested of course. Are you here just to antagonize me? If you have no interest in watching a ufo/uap or participating in any fashionable way, why are you here? 

You did post a video. Post #263. Keep that foolish grin on your face it fits your mistake.

A pointless video and a blunder of a post.

Please explain why anyone should watch the video.

Edited by stereologist

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inversion5
Just now, stereologist said:

You did post a video. Post #263. Keep that foolish grin on your face it fits your mistake.

A pointless video and a blunder of a post.

See, I had no idea what you were talking about. I made no mistake. Thanks for clarifying, minus the attitude.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stereologist
1 minute ago, dirtierdragoon4 said:

See, I had no idea what you were talking about. I made no mistake. Thanks for clarifying, minus the attitude.

You were mistaken because you did post a video without commentary. All you've done is post snotty comments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inversion5
11 minutes ago, stereologist said:

You were mistaken because you did post a video without commentary. All you've done is post snotty comments.

Antagonizing it is. I posted that video (4 days ago mind you) to express that Tom Delonge was exhibiting unusual behavior and a supposed body language expert gave her analysis on it. It was meant to speak to those that thought/think Tom was not legitimate. If it shows that or not, I guess it is in the eyes of the beholder.

Edited by dirtierdragoon4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Area201
1 hour ago, dirtierdragoon4 said:

See, I had no idea what you were talking about. I made no mistake. Thanks for clarifying, minus the attitude.

He needs a short summary of said video and specific place (start and finish). If you do all this, and it's relevant to the topic, he still won't watch it but he might not come back with snooty comments. He might watch a small fraction of it and not get the message in full context, my experience so far. 

I take it as other people (besides him) might be interested in the youtube video and are not so anal about how it's presented. But since you didn't mention it was for him in particular, so I think he should just ignore the said video and maybe let others take something from it. If it wasn't about Delogne than it would be "spam". Somehow in his definition of spam is any video that's not edited down to less than 1 minute or a sentence. Strange I know.

Edited by Area201

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stereologist
2 hours ago, dirtierdragoon4 said:

Antagonizing it is. I posted that video (4 days ago mind you) to express that Tom Delonge was exhibiting unusual behavior and a supposed body language expert gave her analysis on it. It was meant to speak to those that thought/think Tom was not legitimate. If it shows that or not, I guess it is in the eyes of the beholder.

Why not post that isn't of doing your normal childishness?

Now I know NOT to watch that video.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stereologist
1 hour ago, Area201 said:

He needs a short summary of said video and specific place (start and finish). If you do all this, and it's relevant to the topic, he still won't watch it but he might not come back with snooty comments. He might watch a small fraction of it and not get the message in full context, my experience so far. 

I take it as other people (besides him) might be interested in the youtube video and are not so anal about how it's presented. But since you didn't mention it was for him in particular, so I think he should just ignore the said video and maybe let others take something from it. If it wasn't about Delogne than it would be "spam". Somehow in his definition of spam is any video that's not edited down to less than 1 minute or a sentence. Strange I know.

You will learn that almost no one on this site is going to go for click bait.

Videos are often a giant waste of time. A 5 minute video contains less than 30 seconds of reading. Then again they are candy for the uneducated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inversion5
2 hours ago, stereologist said:

...Videos are often a giant waste of time... they are candy for the uneducated.

Very presumptuous and insulting. You get a lot from seeing someone talk.

Edited by dirtierdragoon4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.