Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2
DieChecker

Trump win in the Federal Judiciary

8 posts in this topic

I just saw this and thought it would really get some good discussion going.

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/24/trumps-bi

Quote

Congress has handed Trump a historic presidential victory

  • Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley is giving President Trump yet another major victory on judicial nominations.
  • None of this would have been possible without Harry Reid's decision to kill the filibuster.
  • The result is Trump will get to fill the most federal judiciary vacancies in 40 years.

I warned people about Harry Reid and that stupid decision to end the filibuster. CALLED IT!!

Quote

But that story ignores a bigger and longer-lasting development in the federal judiciary. That brings us first to naming the Republican gift giver: Senator Chuck Grassley from Iowa. The longtime member of Congress has big time clout as the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. And Grassley has just used that clout to eliminate one of the final hurdles in the already furious pace of Trump administration judicial appointments to the federal bench.

Late last week, Grassley decided not to honor a Senate tradition of holding up hearings for judicial nominees who aren't cleared by their own home state senators. That tradition is known as the "blue slip courtesy" born out of time before nationwide communication technology when a given state's senators had access to much more information about nominees than their colleagues from the rest of the country. Grassley correctly noted that Democrats were now trying to use the blue slips tradition to replace the filibuster, and he's having none of that. As recently as last month, the Democrats and much of the news media's punditry were expecting Grassley, who is no fan of the president, to keep the blue slip tradition in place. But Grassley gave Trump this very special gift instead.

And that brings us to the Democrat who provided the initial generous source of President Trump's solid triumph: Former Senate Majority Leader, and Democrat, Harry Reid. Reid is a major reason this good fortune has befallen President Trump because Reid was the one who killed the filibuster rule for judicial nominees in 2013. And when he killed it, it was gone for good.

Republicans were powerless to stop a series of President Obama's judicial nominees after that. That is, until they won control of the Senate in the 2014 elections. The GOP may have failed at using that majority to achieve much, especially making even a dent in Obamacare. But they were able to freeze the Obama nomination process in its tracks, most notably by delaying and eventually killing Merrick Garland's nomination for the Supreme Court.

That long period of confirmation obstruction has given President Trump a huge number of seats to fill; twice as many as President Obama's also large number of vacancies when he took office in 2009. The Christian Science Monitor reports this is likely the most vacancies for a president to fill in 40 years. And the Trump team hasn't been wasting much time.

Quote

But this isn't just about sheer numbers, it's about ideology too. While President Trump and conservatives have diverged in matters of policy several times over the past year, the judicial nomination process is decidedly not one of them. The nominees sent to the Senate from the White House are more conservative and even younger than what we saw during President George W. Bush's two terms in office.

In case the importance of making an impact on the courts is lost on anyone, just note the many setbacks the Trump administration has suffered this year alone thanks to the courts. Delays and changes to the White House-imposed travel and immigration bans have grabbed the most attention. But the administration is also dealing with judicial push back and other potential hurdles on everything from its opposition to the AT&T-Time Warner merger to its transgender military ban.

Now fast forward a couple of years where the Trump judicial appointment surge will have set in across the federal system. Just for this administration alone, that could make a huge difference. And for conservative causes and cases over time, it will be even more significant.

Sure, the tax reform and Obamacare repeal bills may be jeopardized by internal spats between the GOP and the White House. But real history is being made in the courts all thanks to a bad bet made by Senator Reid and remarkable cooperation between the Trump team, Senator Grassley, and Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. While the fights with other senators like Flake et al may grab headlines, these judicial confirmations will have a much bigger impact.

And unless the Democrats win control of the Senate in 2018, there's nothing they can do about it.

Looks like in 4 years when (if?) the Democrats retake the Presidency, we may see the Judiciary knocking down the Dem President's executive orders, as we've seen done with Trump's.

Edited by DieChecker
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

What goes around, comes around.

Short-term power grabs are always a bad idea. Scrapping the blue slip and allowing simple majority votes for Supreme Court candidates will be no different.

Allowing the judicial branch to effectively become an extension of the political branch is going to end badly, for everyone.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Tiggs said:

What goes around, comes around.

Short-term power grabs are always a bad idea. Scrapping the blue slip and allowing simple majority votes for Supreme Court candidates will be no different.

Allowing the judicial branch to effectively become an extension of the political branch is going to end badly, for everyone.

This. Signing executive orders and shaping the Federal structure to suit your needs might seem fine right now, but rarely is anyone thinking about what the NEXT President will do with the powers you just unlocked. Enter Trump: the kind of President every one knew was coming but no one wanted to plan for. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Tiggs said:

What goes around, comes around.

Short-term power grabs are always a bad idea. Scrapping the blue slip and allowing simple majority votes for Supreme Court candidates will be no different.

Allowing the judicial branch to effectively become an extension of the political branch is going to end badly, for everyone.

I'd agree. People supporting such changes are being short sighted.

It seems to me that now this is basically feeding Judicial power back into the Executive branch. The only thing preventing complete abuse is that the Judges can't really be fired, or forced out, so when they retire is on them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Dark_Grey said:

This. Signing executive orders and shaping the Federal structure to suit your needs might seem fine right now, but rarely is anyone thinking about what the NEXT President will do with the powers you just unlocked. Enter Trump: the kind of President every one knew was coming but no one wanted to plan for. 

I never liked legislating by way of Executive Order. It feels to me like the President is grabbing power from the Congress. Not just Trump... Obama did this WAYYYYYY to much for my taste also.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DieChecker said:

The only thing preventing complete abuse is that the Judges can't really be fired, or forced out, so when they retire is on them.

Judges can also be impeached if they go entirely off the rails, or do something illegal.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Tiggs said:

Judges can also be impeached if they go entirely off the rails, or do something illegal.

True! Though it doesn't happen very often, and I imagine you can't just impeach for political ideology.^_^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DieChecker said:

True! Though it doesn't happen very often, and I imagine you can't just impeach for political ideology.^_^

Definitely can't be impeached for political ideology.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.