stereologist Posted December 31, 2017 #1076 Share Posted December 31, 2017 2 minutes ago, lost_shaman said: Not only can the ATFLIR do this but the Super Hornet's RADAR is capable of identifieyng Targets as well. Bold emphasis mine. Thank you showing that it uses matched filtering. You posted " prioritises threat signals, which are characterised in terms of frequency, amplitude, direction and pulse width " That is matched filtering. It identifies targets not aircraft. Thanks for showing I was correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truthseeker007 Posted December 31, 2017 #1077 Share Posted December 31, 2017 1 minute ago, stereologist said: Thank you showing that it uses matched filtering. You posted " prioritises threat signals, which are characterised in terms of frequency, amplitude, direction and pulse width " That is matched filtering. It identifies targets not aircraft. Thanks for showing I was correct. I am still waiting to see you correct on something. You may be correct in your own mind but that's about it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lost_shaman Posted December 31, 2017 #1078 Share Posted December 31, 2017 It does ID aircraft based on those characteristics. This is not new tech, we've deployed it for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted December 31, 2017 #1079 Share Posted December 31, 2017 Just now, Truthseeker007 said: I am still waiting to see you correct on something. You may be correct in your own mind but that's about it. Love the continued cheerleading. Can't say the opinion of a cheerleader is of much use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted December 31, 2017 #1080 Share Posted December 31, 2017 1 minute ago, lost_shaman said: It does ID aircraft based on those characteristics. This is not new tech, we've deployed it for a while. I know that. I am well aware of matched filtering and its mathematical basis. It is a target identification system with the capabilities and limitations of the methodology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truthseeker007 Posted December 31, 2017 #1081 Share Posted December 31, 2017 2 minutes ago, stereologist said: Love the continued cheerleading. Can't say the opinion of a cheerleader is of much use. A cheerleader is much better then a propagandist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted December 31, 2017 #1082 Share Posted December 31, 2017 Just now, Truthseeker007 said: A cheerleader is much better then a propagandist. Thanks for another pointless comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lost_shaman Posted December 31, 2017 #1083 Share Posted December 31, 2017 1 minute ago, stereologist said: I know that. You just said it did not. Based on your hysterical posting on this recent subject your world view must really have been shaken! Sad. I feel bad for you. But not that bad. Happened to me too in 2002 when I had a Close encounter with a UAP. You'll survive. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truthseeker007 Posted December 31, 2017 #1084 Share Posted December 31, 2017 4 minutes ago, stereologist said: Thanks for another pointless comment. I am trying to match your pointless ones. I can't keep up there is to many. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted December 31, 2017 #1085 Share Posted December 31, 2017 3 minutes ago, lost_shaman said: You just said it did not. Based on your hysterical posting on this recent subject your world view must really have been shaken! Sad. I feel bad for you. But not that bad. Happened to me too in 2002 when I had a Close encounter with a UAP. You'll survive. The system identifies targets. It does not identify aircraft. The method is known as matched filtering. I feel bad for your incompetence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lost_shaman Posted December 31, 2017 #1086 Share Posted December 31, 2017 4 minutes ago, stereologist said: The system identifies targets. It does not identify aircraft. The method is known as matched filtering. I feel bad for your incompetence. The only point of the technology is to ID enemy aircraft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted December 31, 2017 #1087 Share Posted December 31, 2017 The system states that it identifies targets and the information it uses in matched filtering to identify a target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lost_shaman Posted December 31, 2017 #1088 Share Posted December 31, 2017 What do you think ID'ing a "target" means? In the context or Air to Air Target identification? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted December 31, 2017 #1089 Share Posted December 31, 2017 Identification of a target is based on a mathematical process called matched filtering. Systems using matched filtering have known advantages and limitations. The limitations are dependent on the filters defined in the system. Some people would like to pretend that identifying targets is the same as identifying aircraft. That is a bad guess. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
preacherman76 Posted December 31, 2017 #1090 Share Posted December 31, 2017 So other planes are never targets? smh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted December 31, 2017 #1091 Share Posted December 31, 2017 1 minute ago, preacherman76 said: So other planes are never targets? smh Can you explain what you are asking? This doesn't make any sense as written. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lost_shaman Posted December 31, 2017 #1092 Share Posted December 31, 2017 2 minutes ago, stereologist said: Identification of a target is based on a mathematical process called matched filtering. Systems using matched filtering have known advantages and limitations. The limitations are dependent on the filters defined in the system. Some people would like to pretend that identifying targets is the same as identifying aircraft. That is a bad guess. I think everything you've posted in the last 24 hours is a collection of "bad guesses". Not only did the FA/18 super Hornet's fail to ID the objects via the RADAR and ATFLIR systems but the U.S.S. Nimitz and it's systems saw these first and called the first FA/18 Squadron off a training mission but also sent up another set of FA/18's to continue chasing these UAP! The Fact that you can't accept this is BORING me. Catch you (literally catch you being full of it) next year! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daughter of the Nine Moons Posted December 31, 2017 #1093 Share Posted December 31, 2017 2 hours ago, Saru said: Thread cleaned Members are again reminded to be civil and courteous when commenting - rudeness and hostility is not appreciated. Thank you. Since certain members are obviously not able to follow a simple request for civility as requested above, the thread is now closed. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts