Jump to content
Unexplained Mysteries uses cookies. By using the site you consent to our use of cookies as per our Cookie Policy.
Close X
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Piney

Joe Arpaio Says He's Running For Senate

33 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

aztek

he is no worst than the rest of them.  he'll fit like a glove there

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Piney
15 minutes ago, aztek said:

he is no worst than the rest of them.  he'll fit like a glove there

More like a rubber.........

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gromdor

He making the Republican primary a three way.  I would tend to think that would drain votes away from Kelli Ward and favor McSally.

I do find it interesting that it is mostly women running in Arizona.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MysticWolf
On 1/9/2018 at 11:13 AM, aztek said:

he is no worst than the rest of them.  he'll fit like a glove there

There are some people in Arizona that aren't fascist gas bags.  I can't say to there numbers though, probably like a needle in a haystack.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Piney
1 hour ago, Mystic Crusader said:

 fascist gas bags.

I think there is more in that bag than gas.....

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
South Alabam

The U.S. Department of Justice concluded that Arpaio oversaw the worst pattern of racial profiling in U.S. history, and subsequently filed suit against him for unlawful discriminatory police conduct.[10][11][12][13] Arpaio's office paid more than $146 million in fees, settlements, and court awards.[14]

In a separate racial-profiling case which concluded in 2013, Arpaio and his subordinates were found to have unfairly targeted Hispanics in conducting traffic stops.[17]

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

 

He didn't follow the constitution as a Sheriff, and now he wants to be a Senator?

Upon taking office, senators-elect must swear or affirm that they will "support and defend the Constitution.". The president of the Senate or a surrogate administers the oath to newly elected or re-elected senators. The oath is required by the Constitution; the wording is prescribed by law."

NO.

 

Edited by South Alabam
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stubbly_Dooright
36 minutes ago, South Alabam said:

The U.S. Department of Justice concluded that Arpaio oversaw the worst pattern of racial profiling in U.S. history, and subsequently filed suit against him for unlawful discriminatory police conduct.[10][11][12][13] Arpaio's office paid more than $146 million in fees, settlements, and court awards.[14]

In a separate racial-profiling case which concluded in 2013, Arpaio and his subordinates were found to have unfairly targeted Hispanics in conducting traffic stops.[17]

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

 

He didn't follow the constitution as a Sheriff, and now he wants to be a Senator?

Upon taking office, senators-elect must swear or affirm that they will "support and defend the Constitution.". The president of the Senate or a surrogate administers the oath to newly elected or re-elected senators. The oath is required by the Constitution; the wording is prescribed by law."

NO.

 

Yes, I did some reading up on him, when I read the headline of him wanting to run. Wasn't there also something about rapes and such being ignored, or the case being thrown out, during his stint? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
South Alabam
39 minutes ago, Stubbly_Dooright said:

Yes, I did some reading up on him, when I read the headline of him wanting to run. Wasn't there also something about rapes and such being ignored, or the case being thrown out, during his stint? 

 

I didn't know about that till I researched it. Another reinforcing factor of why not to vote for this guy.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
South Alabam
7 hours ago, Mystic Crusader said:

He will not get my vote!

Please vote that day.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Paranormal Panther
On 1/11/2018 at 6:42 PM, Mystic Crusader said:

There are some people in Arizona that aren't fascist gas bags.  I can't say to there numbers though, probably like a needle in a haystack.

Some Asians can drive. Some Jews aren't commies. Some Muslims don't murder and rape women. Some leftists don't have double standards, but they seem to be like a needle in a haystack.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Likely Guy

Today's word of the day is "conjecture".

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Paranormal Panther
14 minutes ago, Likely Guy said:

Today's word of the day is "conjecture".

That was yesterday's word. Today's word is "hypocrisy".

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
South Alabam
24 minutes ago, Paranormal Panther said:

That was yesterday's word. Today's word is "hypocrisy".

No hypocrisy with me. I can't stand Hillary or Arpaio. Both ignore the constitution. Ignore laws, destroy evidence, and in the end walk away scott free. I was hard on Hillary for this, and will be on him too. There is no room for people like this in politics. But, people on both sides just seem to ignore what they have done. Go figure.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Likely Guy
37 minutes ago, Paranormal Panther said:

That was yesterday's word. Today's word is "hypocrisy".

Which you so well defined.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Paranormal Panther
18 minutes ago, South Alabam said:

No hypocrisy with me. I can't stand Hillary or Arpaio. Both ignore the constitution. Ignore laws, destroy evidence, and in the end walk away scott free. I was hard on Hillary for this, and will be on him too. There is no room for people like this in politics. But, people on both sides just seem to ignore what they have done. Go figure.

I'm not referring to Arpaio (not a fan). I'm referring to another post that insulted a whole state.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Paranormal Panther
9 minutes ago, Likely Guy said:

Which you so well defined.

How so? Be specific.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Likely Guy
Just now, Paranormal Panther said:

I'm not referring to Arpaio (not a fan). I'm referring to another post that insulted a whole state.

Was that from the person that lives in said state?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Paranormal Panther
6 minutes ago, Likely Guy said:

Was that from the person that lives in said state?

It doesn't matter. What difference would it make?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Likely Guy
Just now, Paranormal Panther said:

It doesn't matter. What difference would it make?

Well, you told me once that people outside a jurisdiction shouldn't be allowed an opinion.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Paranormal Panther
2 minutes ago, Likely Guy said:

Well, you told me once that people outside a jurisdiction shouldn't be allowed an opinion.

I don't remember that. What thread was that in?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Likely Guy
1 minute ago, Paranormal Panther said:

I don't remember that. What thread was that in?

That's hilarious. You told me a number of times that foreigner's opinions are worth less, yet you have issue with Mystic Crusader's opinion of their home state.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.