Trump wants to become president for life?

[Farmer77]

2 minutes ago, preacherman76 said:

ts crazy. We are talking about a women who has made a lot of money being a *****. This is tabloid crap. Unless he raped her, why should anyone care?

Campaign finance concerns due to the payoff are legit.

I also say this speaks greatly to the character of a man who many have publicly proclaimed has been sent by GAWD himself and to the character of so called Christians who continue to function as if such a claim were true. 

3 minutes ago, preacherman76 said:

This happened over a decade ago. Even her saying he was no good at it doesn't mean anything

Yeah that's just tabloid fodder. 

 

 

[Lilly]

*Sigh* You can't successfully impeach and remove a President based upon his sexual relationships. They tried this nonsense with Bill Clinton and they had DNA evidence. All it did was to make Ken Starr look foolish. 

 

 

[preacherman76]

29 minutes ago, Farmer77 said:

Campaign finance concerns due to the payoff are legit.

I also say this speaks greatly to the character of a man who many have publicly proclaimed has been sent by GAWD himself and to the character of so called Christians who continue to function as if such a claim were true. 

Yeah that's just tabloid fodder. 

 

 

I highly doubt he used campaign finances. He knew very well that he was being closely monitored by both parties.

[Farmer77]

5 minutes ago, Lilly said:

*Sigh* You can't successfully impeach and remove a President based upon his sexual relationships. They tried this nonsense with Bill Clinton and they had DNA evidence. All it did was to make Ken Starr look foolish. 

 

 

No one is trying to use Stormy to remove Trump from office. 

[Farmer77]

Just now, preacherman76 said:

I highly doubt he used campaign finances. He knew very well that he was being closely monitored by both parties.

No I think the concern is that because the lawyer made the hush payment during the campaign it should have been considered a contribution. Its not something I'd personally make a huge deal of but ya know the "law and order" POTUS should probably have the ability to follow the law. 

(not sure I entirely agree with the headline BTW) 

The Stormy Daniels hush money scandal is a big deal. We're treating it that way.

Quote

Americans have a right to follow the money when it comes to campaign spending. Including whether $130,000 in hush money is anonymously funneled to a person who might have damaging information about a major party’s presidential nominee less than a month before the election.

 

[Lilly]

1 minute ago, Farmer77 said:

No one is trying to use Stormy to remove Trump from office. 

Oh sure, impeachment and removal from office isn't the primary objective with all this stuff. BTW, I have a nice bridge in NYC I'd be willing to sell you for a very good price. 

 

 

[Farmer77]

Just now, Lilly said:

Oh sure, impeachment and removal from office isn't the primary objective with all this stuff. BTW, I have a nice bridge in NYC I'd be willing to sell you for a very good price. 

LOL Trump and friends are a freak show Lilly, that is going to draw eyes and TV coverage. 

No overarching nefarious scheme necessary this crap is just bearded lady level bizarre 

[Lilly]

There's been a lot of 'freak shows' then, Clinton getting oral sex in the oval office, Kennedy cavorting with a movie star, LBJ urinating off the balcony of the White House and speculated ties to an infamous DC madam. Frankly, I could care less at this point...we just need to fix the economy and get out of debt. 

[Farmer77]

Just now, Lilly said:

 Frankly, I could care less at this point...we just need to fix the economy and get out of debt. 

Don't see any chance of that happening any time soon unfortunately. 

[preacherman76]

1 hour ago, Farmer77 said:

No I think the concern is that because the lawyer made the hush payment during the campaign it should have been considered a contribution. Its not something I'd personally make a huge deal of but ya know the "law and order" POTUS should probably have the ability to follow the law. 

(not sure I entirely agree with the headline BTW) 

The Stormy Daniels hush money scandal is a big deal. We're treating it that way.

 

Yea this could be taken a number of ways. Did he offer her this out of no where? Or did she come asking for it? If the latter that's sounds like blackmail. Hell that IS blackmail.

Long as he used his own personal money, I don't see how it could be considered a contribution. A contribution to what? She wasn't running a campaign or a charity.

He should have done what 0bama did regarding the guy who claimed he was his gay lover/crack dealer. He should have just ignored her.

[Truthseeker007]

On ‎3‎/‎4‎/‎2018 at 5:34 AM, IBelieveWhatIWant said:

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/03/politics/trump-maralago-remarks/index.html

Yeah, I knew this was gonna happen. Give a megalomaniac power and he will just want more

 

 

They said that about Obama and Bush also. It is a recurring theme to inflict fear in the masses.

[IBelieveWhatIWant]

20 minutes ago, Truthseeker007 said:

They said that about Obama and Bush also. It is a recurring theme to inflict fear in the masses.

Obama and Bush didn't comment on another counties president becoming a leader for life with "maybe we'll give that a shot someday".

And despite what others may say and what Trump himself may say, it wasn't a "joke" for the simple fact that soon after those comments were made, Trump also came out and said that he wants to death penalty for drug traffickers, something else he got from Xi Jinping

[Truthseeker007]

5 minutes ago, IBelieveWhatIWant said:

Obama and Bush didn't comment on another counties president becoming a leader for life with "maybe we'll give that a shot someday".

And despite what others may say and what Trump himself may say, it wasn't a "joke" for the simple fact that soon after those comments were made, Trump also came out and said that he wants to death penalty for drug traffickers, something else he got from Xi Jinping

It really don't matter who is president the same hidden hand is always in power. The same hidden hand controls Trump just like it controlled Obama and going all the way back to at least JFK who I think was the last legit president.

[Farmer77]

1 hour ago, preacherman76 said:

Long as he used his own personal money, I don't see how it could be considered a contribution. A contribution to what? She wasn't running a campaign or a charity.

His attorney has claimed that he is the one who paid for it not Trump.  

1 hour ago, preacherman76 said:

He should have done what 0bama did regarding the guy who claimed he was his gay lover/crack dealer. He should have just ignored her.

It sounds to me like the media was starting to take an interest in her in the weeks before the election so Trump's attorneys threw her a lump sum to keep her from talking. 

Obama could ignore the accusation because even if he was gay his base doesn't care, a large percentage of Trump's base (theoretically anyways) should care.  

 

[Paranormal Panther]

11 hours ago, preacherman76 said:

Its crazy. We are talking about a women who has made a lot of money being a *****. This is tabloid crap. Unless he raped her, why should anyone care? This happened over a decade ago. Even her saying he was no good at it doesn't mean anything. Women was sleeping with porn stars. You don't get to be a male porn star by being average. By the time he got there it was probably like throwing a hotdog down a hallway.

Remember that Democrats have selective outrages. They clutch their pearls over Trump, but they shrug their shoulders over Clinton and other members of their party. It's not like Trump makes out with fifteen-year-old high school girls by the White House pool. I can't say the same for another president.

[Farmer77]

12 hours ago, Paranormal Panther said:

Remember that Democrats have selective outrages.

There's no outrage here, just mockery.

The man millions of evangelicals were told by their leaders had been sent by gawd pays women so he can have extramarital affairs, lies about it and pays them to not talk about it.  (We really need a pointing and laughing emoticon) 

Although I suppose there may be a little outrage at the fact that no one cares about the campaign finance issues involved. That's only mildly hypocritical considering the passion which people are arguing with about protecting the sanctity of our elections in another thread but whatever. 

Edited March 14, 2018 by Farmer77

[Aquila King]

17 hours ago, Paranormal Panther said:

Remember that Democrats have selective outrages. They clutch their pearls over Trump, but they shrug their shoulders over Clinton and other members of their party. It's not like Trump makes out with fifteen-year-old high school girls by the White House pool. I can't say the same for another president.

Tell me you weren't a Roy Moore supporter, cause if so the irony level would break a new record right here.

[aztek]

On 3/13/2018 at 9:32 AM, IBelieveWhatIWant said:

Trump also came out and said that he wants to death penalty for drug traffickers, something else he got from Xi Jinping

iran has that, yet it has one of the highest number of heroin addicts, so it does not really work, 

[IBelieveWhatIWant]

15 minutes ago, aztek said:

iran has that, yet it has one of the highest number of heroin addicts, so it does not really work, 

Doesn't matter if it works or not, either way it's wrong. My point is that there are 2 instances of Trump seeing what another leader is doing and insinuating that he will implement the same thing.

[Space Commander Travis]

On 3/13/2018 at 1:32 PM, IBelieveWhatIWant said:

Obama and Bush didn't comment on another counties president becoming a leader for life with "maybe we'll give that a shot someday".

Obama and Bush both cheerfully removed other countries' leaders from power (and cheerfully colluded at their murder) even if they were no conceivable threat to themselves. Obama may have had the press smirking loyally at everything he said in those big love-ins that they called Press Conferences back in the good old days, but it's hard to identify any ability to perhaps not take himself 100% seriously all the time, which is what this remark of the Orange Leader sounds like to me.

[Space Commander Travis]

5 hours ago, Farmer77 said:

The man millions of evangelicals were told by their leaders had been sent by gawd pays women so he can have extramarital affairs, lies about it and pays them to not talk about it.  (We really need a pointing and laughing emoticon) 

are we talking about the current President here, Ronald Trump? I think Ben Carson was the one who the evangelicals were all gunning for. 

[aztek]

Just now, IBelieveWhatIWant said:

Doesn't matter if it works or not, either way it's wrong. My point is that there are 2 instances of Trump seeing what another leader is doing and insinuating that he will implement the same thing.

 

so what? i do not see anything wrong that this concept. i may argue whether it is right or wrong to implement certain policies, but the idea of doing what others is fine by me.

isn't it what liberals want as far as gun control? "lets do same thing Europe and australia did:" same thing if you ask me,

[Farmer77]

Just now, Vlad the Mighty said:

are we talking about the current President here, Ronald Trump? I think Ben Carson was the one who the evangelicals were all gunning for. 

Yeah they wanted Carson but once he spoke and Trump got the nomination they jumped onboard with him. 

 

[F3SS]

It’s not like they were going to go for the entirely godless Democrat party. Who else would those who voted have gone for?

[IBelieveWhatIWant]

1 hour ago, aztek said:

 

so what? i do not see anything wrong that this concept. i may argue whether it is right or wrong to implement certain policies, but the idea of doing what others is fine by me.

isn't it what liberals want as far as gun control? "lets do same thing Europe and australia did:" same thing if you ask me,

I see you live up to your signature there. Well I'm not gonna bite anymore than I already have.