Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Trump to Veto Omnibus Spending Bill?


Dark_Grey

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Farmer77 said:

Ill bet dollars to donuts that within days Trump tweets something along the lines of " despite having the funding the democrats are blocking construction of my wall" ....and the trumpians will eat it hook line and sinker. 

What raised my eyebrow wasn't the wall but the bragging of the billions needlessly given to military spending that he thought he could divert.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
6 minutes ago, Gromdor said:

What raised my eyebrow wasn't the wall but the bragging of the billions needlessly given to military spending that he thought he could divert.

If that's really the case its a pretty bold move. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Farmer77 said:

Ill bet dollars to donuts that within days Trump tweets something along the lines of " despite having the funding the democrats are blocking construction of my wall" ....and the trumpians will eat it hook line and sinker. 

Trump can use military funding to construct the Great Wall.  It's all in the wording... The language.  HR 2810 passed in December 2017.

Obama never passed a budget!! He also used spending bills to spend however he wished.. just  like King Trump will!!

It is exactly the same!!

One minor difference... Trump stated after signing this is the last time he'd sign a spending bill that isn't itemised.

The money is there.

The government gave him an extra 160 billion $ 

The wall is completely funded.  

The wording is in the bill.... The contract... A little something our daddy knows something about.

I'll post the pics of how the wording changed in a bit.... ATM I'm mixing a few bags of concrete.

 

And Mexico will still pay for the Great American Wall after new trade negotiations on NAFTA are completed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, acidhead said:

The wording is in the bill.... The contract... A little something our daddy knows something about.

Omnibus Bill Includes Specific Clause Barring Funding for Donald Trump ‘Wall’

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, acidhead said:

Trump can use military funding to construct the Great Wall.  It's all in the wording... The language.  HR 2810 passed in December 2017.

Obama never passed a budget!! He also used spending bills to spend however he wished.. just  like King Trump will!!

It is exactly the same!!

One minor difference... Trump stated after signing this is the last time he'd sign a spending bill that isn't itemised.

The money is there.

The government gave him an extra 160 billion $ 

The wall is completely funded.  

The wording is in the bill.... The contract... A little something our daddy knows something about.

I'll post the pics of how the wording changed in a bit.... ATM I'm mixing a few bags of concrete.

 

And Mexico will still pay for the Great American Wall after new trade negotiations on NAFTA are completed.

The bill is over 2000 pages long.  Pretty sure Trump hasn't read it, let alone spotted a clause that lets him shuffle money.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Farmer77 said:

Yes

That was the 1.6 billion.. restrictions were put on that money!!

I've only got a few more bags to mix.. hold on I'll post how bill 2810 gives the executive branch power to use money to fund the great American Wall!!

Do try to keep up!

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gromdor said:

The bill is over 2000 pages long.  Pretty sure Trump hasn't read it, let alone spotted a clause that lets him shuffle money.

He didnt need to read it.  This spending bill  came to him through Barak Obama.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the text and rule # from the draft of the Department of Defense bill.

 

FB_IMG_1522128960033.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, here's the final bill. Note that this rule is gone and replaced with another rule.

 

FB_IMG_1522129086446.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/23/2018 at 9:53 PM, acidhead said:

Our Lord saviour, Donald J Trump is a genius!!!!

 Build the wall!!

Lock her up!!!

Drain the swamp!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, acidhead said:

Now, here's the final bill. Note that this rule is gone and replaced with another rule.

 

FB_IMG_1522129086446.jpg

Can you provide some sources? I'm looking at the bill now and what I'm seeing in 1039 is wholly different. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That language is ONLY in the appropriation for the Department of Homeland Security. 

It is not in the law regarding the Department of Defense.

Contracts are contracts.

Trump knows contracts.

It will go to the Supreme court... Just like the supposed Muslim ban and get over turned.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, acidhead said:

That language is ONLY in the appropriation for the Department of Homeland Security. 

It is not in the law regarding the Department of Defense.

Contracts are contracts.

Trump knows contracts.

It will go to the Supreme court... Just like the supposed Muslim ban and get over turned.

So dude I think you're getting duped by someone's wishful thinking , and maybe their photoshop. I haven't found anything resembling either of the posts you made in the bill itself. Granted its huge and I could be missing it but ive used the search function and ive scanned it myself. 

Please share your source. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, acidhead said:

That language is ONLY in the appropriation for the Department of Homeland Security. 

It is not in the law regarding the Department of Defense.

Contracts are contracts.

Trump knows contracts.

It will go to the Supreme court... Just like the supposed Muslim ban and get over turned.

I sense the coming explosion of Leftist heads...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see it now:

"Generals - thanks to President Trump we have a very very generous financial settlement this year for defence. Priorities please?"

"President Trump's Wall"

"No chance"

"But the President wants a wall for defence"

"The Money is not going on a fking wall, we can spend it on real toys like ships and planes and spacecraft"

"Spacecraft that's it - no wall - spacecraft"

"President Trump wouldn't be happy, he wanted the money for the wall"

"We have the money and what the military has the military holds"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RAyMO said:

"We have the money and what the military has the military holds"

3 words... Commander in Chief... :w00t: :gun:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, and then said:

Commander in Chief.

Oh I know, but even so, he has to work with rules and needs the support of the military - his parade might turn out less than he expects otherwise.

BTW it does no harm to think on the lighter side sometimes.

ETA: Otherwise part of the parade will have to include big trailers with pride of place for concrete wall sections.

Edited by RAyMO
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Great Wall is Coming!!

And so it should.

The opioid crisis is out of control.

The southern border in the USA is a national security risk, not only to the USA, but to Canada as well.

Canada needs to buck up and pay it's fair share.

It's out of control 

To Canadians, like me, go to the east side of Vancouver and look!!

It's gotta end.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also to add..

Check every single sea can that comes into port.

Every single one.

Send the military there.

Enough is enough.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, acidhead said:

The Great Wall is Coming!!

And so it should.

The opioid crisis is out of control.

The southern border in the USA is a national security risk, not only to the USA, but to Canada as well.

Canada needs to buck up and pay it's fair share.

It's out of control 

To Canadians, like me, go to the east side of Vancouver and look!!

It's gotta end.

 

We have a thing called a "coastline" where most of the drugs come through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, acidhead said:

Also to add..

Check every single sea can that comes into port.

Every single one.

Send the military there.

Enough is enough.

 

Almost 2 million containers come into Vancouver and Delta annually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.