RoofGardener Posted September 2, 2018 #51 Share Posted September 2, 2018 2 minutes ago, papageorge1 said: Maye in this case it is your comprehension of what I wrote that 'seems awfully low'. If you read slowly I placed no certainty 'on a single photo', right? (only a possibility). I believe in the phenomena of residual haunting/energy for reasons beyond this single photo. And yet you regard this incident as confirmation of your theory ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenoFish Posted September 2, 2018 #52 Share Posted September 2, 2018 Sorry but my pareidolia mustn't be working right all I see is what looks like smoke. Nothing paranormal at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoofGardener Posted September 2, 2018 #53 Share Posted September 2, 2018 Just now, XenoFish said: Sorry but my pareidolia mustn't be working right all I see is what looks like smoke. Nothing paranormal at all. Well, we have a photograph ? And the image in the photographs was NOT - according to the taker - visible to the 'uman eye at the time of taking it ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted September 2, 2018 #54 Share Posted September 2, 2018 Just now, RoofGardener said: And yet you regard this incident as confirmation of your theory ? Seriously, you are still not comprehending? This incident does not confirm my theory, it is just a possible example of my general theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenoFish Posted September 2, 2018 #55 Share Posted September 2, 2018 1 minute ago, RoofGardener said: Well, we have a photograph ? And the image in the photographs was NOT - according to the taker - visible to the 'uman eye at the time of taking it ? All this ghost stuff is so freaking boring. It's never a ghost. Just people overactive imaginations. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoofGardener Posted September 2, 2018 #56 Share Posted September 2, 2018 4 minutes ago, papageorge1 said: Seriously, you are still not comprehending? This incident does not confirm my theory, it is just a possible example of my general theory. Which part of "It's b******s" are you struggling with ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted September 2, 2018 #57 Share Posted September 2, 2018 4 minutes ago, RoofGardener said: Which part of "It's b******s" are you struggling with ? The part where posters on UM can not read what I say intelligently! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnoferox Posted September 2, 2018 #58 Share Posted September 2, 2018 7 hours ago, papageorge1 said: The part where posters on UM can not read what I say intelligently! Sorry papa, but there's no way to read what you write "intelligently". 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NightScreams Posted September 3, 2018 #59 Share Posted September 3, 2018 Another photograph that requires me to use my imagination after it's suggested what it's supposed to be. This is one of those things that should not be published only because it requires one to actually be there to experience it. Publishing this type of subjective evidence does more to hurt ghost hunting than help it. In fact I think the last 20 years of videos and ghost hunting shows on TV along with docudrama's of such have permanently hurt any chances of legit and non-biased paranormal investigators of ever having credible evidence or be taken seriously to warrant further study and more importantly, grants from Universities and scientific institutions. Used to be that scientists could get some funding to research paranormal stuff, now it's a stigma. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted September 3, 2018 #60 Share Posted September 3, 2018 On 4/19/2018 at 6:00 AM, freetoroam said: I zoomed out and saw a giant Camila and a welsh pigeon. MY EYES!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted September 3, 2018 #61 Share Posted September 3, 2018 19 hours ago, RoofGardener said: Based on a single photograph ? Taken with very little background context ? In the presence of OTHER people taking photographs, who's images we havn't seen ? Well.. OK Papageorge1. Believe what you want to believe. But I have to say... your "threshold of credibility" when viewing evidence seems awfully low ? It's also the willingness to make up baloney that jumps to the front of line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now