danydandan 13,924 #76 Posted July 6, 2018 Just now, kmt_sesh said: It has to come from WVK. He appears to be the grader around here. Man that's not fair. I have PhD I should be able to grade people too. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kmt_sesh 36,419 #77 Posted July 6, 2018 Maybe F stands for Fabulous? And FF for Friggin' Fabulous? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jmccr8 17,237 #78 Posted July 6, 2018 1 minute ago, danydandan said: Man that's not fair. I have PhD I should be able to grade people too. Well this is kind of like Sadie Hawkins of learning, the guy in the pointy hat gets to grade papers this time. jmccr8 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
danydandan 13,924 #79 Posted July 6, 2018 1 minute ago, kmt_sesh said: Maybe F stands for Fabulous? And FF for Friggin' Fabulous? I thought it was a signature like Harte does at the end of each post. I just assumed it meant Frank. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WVK 295 #80 Posted July 6, 2018 3 hours ago, jmccr8 said: Hi WVK, You might want to do a search on that, I am going to give you a few links to read but this is IN NO WAY support for the comments that you are making about Egyptians and burial music boxes. https://phys.org/wire-news/164386603/ancient-man-used-super-acoustics-to-alter-consciousness-and-spe.html https://www.newgrange.com/ http://www.ancientmusicireland.com/page/instruments-through-the-ages.html https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology-mysterious-phenomena/experts-unravel-sound-effects-malta-s-hypogeum-hal jmccr8 I believe the best case for intentional acoustics is the Great Ballcourt in Chichen Itza Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord Harry 1,634 #81 Posted July 6, 2018 (edited) 30 minutes ago, danydandan said: I thought it was a signature like Harte does at the end of each post. I just assumed it meant Frank. WVK stands for Weird Vigorously Persistent Krank. With the word "crank" spelled wrong because...well...you know... Edited July 6, 2018 by Lord Harry 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
danydandan 13,924 #82 Posted July 6, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, WVK said: I believe the best case for intentional acoustics is the Great Ballcourt in Chichen Itza Why? I think the lecture room in the Fogg Museum is the best example of acoustic architecture. As is The Āli Qapu Palace, St Paul's Cathedral and Epidaurus Theatre. Edited July 6, 2018 by danydandan 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jmccr8 17,237 #84 Posted July 6, 2018 2 minutes ago, danydandan said: Why? Probably because the links I have are not credible enough or maybe to credible. You should have seen the thread about molded rocks in S.America no amount of credible documentation was acceptable. jmccr8 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
danydandan 13,924 #85 Posted July 6, 2018 9 minutes ago, Lord Harry said: WVK stands for Weird Vigorously Persistent Krank. With the word "crank" spelt wrong because...well...you know... That's how the Germans spell it. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WVK 295 #86 Posted July 6, 2018 1 hour ago, jmccr8 said: Hi Wvk Why don't you take what credible posters are telling you seriously? I mean they are proficient in their fields and are giving you worthwhile responses.AA to them jmccr8 Because the quote I provided discussed the acoustical phonomona noticed when humming at a certain frequency inside thw box , nothing about banging on the coffer. twice. As far as the 438hz resonance recorded (by smacking the box) equaling length of a base side, I assume it a coincidence because the AEs had no way, that I can think of, to measure that frequency. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
John Bastien 366 #87 Posted July 6, 2018 Why in all logic would anyone care about acoustics for a dead body? It is a stone box capped off with 2 million tons of pure bling. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord Harry 1,634 #88 Posted July 6, 2018 Just now, WVK said: Because the quote I provided discussed the acoustical phonomona noticed when humming at a certain frequency inside thw box , nothing about banging on the coffer. twice. As far as the 438hz resonance recorded (by smacking the box) equaling length of a base side, I assume it a coincidence because the AEs had no way, that I can think of, to measure that frequency. Only problem with that is dead kings can't hum. So there goes your "theory." 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
danydandan 13,924 #89 Posted July 6, 2018 1 minute ago, WVK said: Because the quote I provided discussed the acoustical phonomona noticed when humming at a certain frequency inside thw box , nothing about banging on the coffer. twice. As far as the 438hz resonance recorded (by smacking the box) equaling length of a base side, I assume it a coincidence because the AEs had no way, that I can think of, to measure that frequency. They had no way to measure any musical frequency. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
John Bastien 366 #90 Posted July 6, 2018 Maybe we should invite Cladking in for the discussion and I can watch for the entertainment value. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jmccr8 17,237 #91 Posted July 6, 2018 2 minutes ago, WVK said: Because the quote I provided discussed the acoustical phonomona noticed when humming at a certain frequency inside thw box , nothing about banging on the coffer. twice. As far as the 438hz resonance recorded (by smacking the box) equaling length of a base side, I assume it a coincidence because the AEs had no way, that I can think of, to measure that frequency. Yes and dead men don't hum, nor do they tell tales. jmccr8 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jmccr8 17,237 #92 Posted July 6, 2018 1 minute ago, John Bastien said: Maybe we should invite Cladking in for the discussion and I can watch for the entertainment value. Metaphysical stone music hummed by dead men. jmccr8 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord Harry 1,634 #93 Posted July 6, 2018 2 minutes ago, jmccr8 said: Yes and dead men don't hum, nor do they tell tales. jmccr8 Maybe he got confused watching a certain movie with Brenden Fraser? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jmccr8 17,237 #94 Posted July 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Lord Harry said: Maybe he got confused watching a certain movie with Brenden Fraser? Any one of three in the series but only two were related to Egypt. jmccr8 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harte 17,745 #95 Posted July 6, 2018 6 hours ago, WVK said: I would suggest reading the quote before commenting. F Not arrogant enough. F- Harte 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
John Bastien 366 #96 Posted July 6, 2018 Unless the dead make their own music. 2 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kmt_sesh 36,419 #97 Posted July 6, 2018 17 minutes ago, Lord Harry said: Maybe he got confused watching a certain movie with Brenden Fraser? I thought that was a documentary. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kmt_sesh 36,419 #98 Posted July 6, 2018 22 minutes ago, John Bastien said: Maybe we should invite Cladking in for the discussion and I can watch for the entertainment value. Do not even think that! Danger! 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
John Bastien 366 #99 Posted July 6, 2018 I found something acoustic crossed with a crank! (Is that a Mafdet lower left?) 1 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord Harry 1,634 #100 Posted July 6, 2018 38 minutes ago, John Bastien said: Maybe we should invite Cladking in for the discussion and I can watch for the entertainment value. It would appear as if he is waging war by proxy. First with Roc Krotch and now with this fine musical loving fellow. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
