Harte 15,480 #201 Posted July 15, 2018 The frequency of Ayyy. Harte 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WVK 52 #202 Posted July 15, 2018 On 7/13/2018 at 3:40 PM, jmccr8 said: Hi WVK How they are different cultures separated by time and distance that built different structures serving different purposes. You have to look at things in the context of culture and use. jmccr8 I did not intend to suggest that they were connected in anyway. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jmccr8 12,941 #203 Posted July 15, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, WVK said: I did not intend to suggest that they were connected in anyway. Hi WVK I earlier commented that the acoustical properties of the sarcophagus was incidental and stand by that. The structure that you made reference to was designed to have those qualities which shows intent so any comparison is rather pointless. Many cultures understood and constructed sites for the amplification of sound which is why we find theatres, arenas, forums etc. The pyramid and contents were a one time use so there was no intent for sound amplification incorporated into them which was why I commented. jmccr8 Edited July 15, 2018 by jmccr8 Fat fingers or the devil made me do it 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WVK 52 #204 Posted July 15, 2018 1 hour ago, jmccr8 said: Hi WVK I earlier commented that the acoustical properties of the sarcophagus was incidental and stand by that. The structure that you made reference to was designed to have those qualities which shows intent so any comparison is rather pointless. Many cultures understood and constructed sites for the amplification of sound which is why we find theatres, arenas, forums etc. The pyramid and contents were a one time use so there was no intent for sound amplification incorporated into them which was why I commented. jmccr8 1 hour ago, jmccr8 said: Hi WVK I earlier commented that the acoustical properties of the sarcophagus was incidental and stand by that. The structure that you made reference to was designed to have those qualities which shows intent so any comparison is rather pointless. Many cultures understood and constructed sites for the amplification of sound which is why we find theatres, arenas, forums etc. The pyramid and contents were a one time use so there was no intent for sound amplification incorporated into them which was why I commented. jmccr8 "I earlier commented that the acoustical properties of the sarcophagus was incidental and stand by that. The pyramid and contents were a one time use so there was no intent for sound amplification incorporated into them which was why I commented." Lets agree to agree. Technically it requires additional power to "amplify". Oh wait, wasn't the GP a power plant? :-) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jmccr8 12,941 #205 Posted July 15, 2018 1 minute ago, WVK said: "I earlier commented that the acoustical properties of the sarcophagus was incidental and stand by that. The pyramid and contents were a one time use so there was no intent for sound amplification incorporated into them which was why I commented." Lets agree to agree. Technically it requires additional power to "amplify". Oh wait, wasn't the GP a power plant? :-) Hi WVK I hope that you are just joking about the power plant. jmccr8 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WVK 52 #206 Posted July 15, 2018 2 minutes ago, jmccr8 said: Hi WVK I hope that you are just joking about the power plant. jmccr8 Indeed I was! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
