Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
UM-Bot

Woman photographs 'ghost' in her front yard

88 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

RoofGardener

ZOMG.. he's turned into a Giraffe !

giraffe.thumb.jpg.4ab5940b7b8709ee8f8ab689aecc06ef.jpg

SPOOKY !

What we where seeing was a car headlight on the dark section of bushes (to the left of the two floor-lights). This causes it to become lighter than its surroundings, and in an irregular pattern. It is this light patch that we see as the Man In The Hunting Jacket.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
stereologist
On 7/15/2018 at 11:50 AM, papageorge1 said:

My first intuitive thought was a soldier remembering his return to his hometown. It struck me as a period uniform.

Skeptic in me asks could a living person just have entered and  exited the scene in 10 seconds. Could the timer be a little off and it was longer? A hoaxed photo is always possible  but then for what and for why? 

Papameter reads a 55% chance of a paranormal capture.

Your math is off. The person had up to 20 seconds. There are 10 seconds before each image and 10 seconds after each image.

Quote

The only thing I see obvious is an emotional anti-paranormal bent in some.

I see an irrational paranormal bent in some.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stereologist
On 7/15/2018 at 3:42 PM, papageorge1 said:

It is not anti-science to consider that there is more to reality than meets the senses and consider all evidence. Denying the existence of things that can not be proved or disproved by science is actually a non-scientific attitude to me.

Apparently you don't know the meaning of science.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
papageorge1
30 minutes ago, stereologist said:

Apparently you don't know the meaning of science.

Where is my thinking wrong in what you quoted tfrom me, Stereo?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stereologist
1 minute ago, papageorge1 said:

Where is my thinking wrong in what you quoted tfrom me, Stereo?

1. There is no evidence for the things you often promote.

2. Anecdotes is not evidence.

3. Science does not prove anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
papageorge1
1 minute ago, stereologist said:

1. There is no evidence for the things you often promote.

2. Anecdotes is not evidence.

3. Science does not prove anything.

Well you are definately wrong on the first two. I use the word ‘evidence’ as in the dictionary myself. Your definition is more akin to ‘proof’.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stereologist
Just now, papageorge1 said:

Well you are definately wrong on the first two. I use the word ‘evidence’ as in the dictionary myself. Your definition is more akin to ‘proof’.

The simple fact of the matter is that you are wrong.

1. There is no evidence for the things you often promote.

2. Anecdotes is not evidence.

No amount of pretending changes anecdotes into evidence.

You are also wrong about the use of proof. You use the word evidence in a manner which does not match up with its use in science. To avoid you moving the goalposts I will place the context in this post. It is this post from you.

Quote

It is not anti-science to consider that there is more to reality than meets the senses and consider all evidence. Denying the existence of things that can not be proved or disproved by science is actually a non-scientific attitude to me.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
papageorge1
4 minutes ago, stereologist said:

The simple fact of the matter is that you are wrong.

1. There is no evidence for the things you often promote.

2. Anecdotes is not evidence.

No amount of pretending changes anecdotes into evidence.

You are also wrong about the use of proof. You use the word evidence in a manner which does not match up with its use in science. To avoid you moving the goalposts I will place the context in this post. It is this post from you.

 

I am still waiting to hear what you claim is wrong about my post. It sounds fine to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alien Origins
On 7/15/2018 at 2:14 PM, Stiff said:

Well whadaya know - she's fundraising :rolleyes:

http://www.theforecaster.net/durham-campaign-aims-to-save-old-town-hall/

And a comment from the article:

I was a believer until the article mentions she has 20,000 followers who read about her paranormal adventures "

She's also claimed similar before: http://www.sunjournal.com/weird-wicked-weird-take-2016/

Smell fishy yet papa? 

Yep...I think the fish in Denmark just got a little closer to rotten.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stereologist
18 minutes ago, papageorge1 said:

I am still waiting to hear what you claim is wrong about my post. It sounds fine to me.

Thanks for agreeing to your total ignorance on the meaning of science.

Here again are 3 of the reasons to show your incompetence.

1. There is no evidence for the things you often promote.

2. Anecdotes is not evidence.

3. Science does not prove anything.

All you have for the things you believe are your gullibility. You have no evidence. You have nothing.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
papageorge1
11 minutes ago, stereologist said:

Thanks for agreeing to your total ignorance on the meaning of science.

Here again are 3 of the reasons to show your incompetence.

1. There is no evidence for the things you often promote.

2. Anecdotes is not evidence.

3. Science does not prove anything.

All you have for the things you believe are your gullibility. You have no evidence. You have nothing.

OK, enough for this merry-go-round Mr. One-Note. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stereologist
1 minute ago, papageorge1 said:

OK, enough for this merry-go-round Mr. One-Note. 

I do hope you take the time to learn what science is and how science does not prove anything and the meaning of evidence and facts and theory as it is used in science. Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Avalanche
On 2018-08-29 at 3:01 PM, RoofGardener said:

ZOMG.. he's turned into a Giraffe !

giraffe.thumb.jpg.4ab5940b7b8709ee8f8ab689aecc06ef.jpg

SPOOKY !

What we where seeing was a car headlight on the dark section of bushes (to the left of the two floor-lights). This causes it to become lighter than its surroundings, and in an irregular pattern. It is this light patch that we see as the Man In The Hunting Jacket.

 

" He turned into a giraffe " it could be a drama lama :-)

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.