Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
UM-Bot

MH370 report data 'modified', say investigators

Recommended Posts

 
Sir Wearer of Hats

But why would they do that?

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Astra.
33 minutes ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said:

But why would they do that?

Good question. The thing is tho, there are so many differing conspiracy's and opinions that surround the disappearance of this aircraft...it's difficult to know what to believe. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Timothy

@Sir Wearer of Hats & @Astra., the way that air traffic control systems record data is very specific.

Even the less safe systems used by countries like Malaysia record data which is very hard to fake. 

Why? Maybe to limit $$ payout, maybe more or less sinister, maybe just better for PR. Who knows.

We may never know the real cause or explanation. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jon the frog

All that for saving face ? That they known the fate or they have influenced it ? Strange stuff indeed but it look like another conspiracy theory...

Edited by Jon the frog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Timothy
22 minutes ago, Jon the frog said:

All that for saving face ? That they known the fate or they have influenced it ? Strange stuff indeed but it look like another conspiracy theory...

What’s your opinion then? 

With the systems that were in place, a passenger aircraft could have absolutely not been accounted for. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jon the frog
48 minutes ago, Timothy said:

What’s your opinion then? 

With the systems that were in place, a passenger aircraft could have absolutely not been accounted for. 

It's the ''Expert independent investigators'' thing that make me a little bit confuse... Which investigator ? Expert of what? Investigator for Who?

Yep if it's true is quite strange, but does this ''group of external investigator'' have access to the data that the true agency have or just public available data ? Does he talk about the true log,  translation of the log text because maybe all of it is not in english, the captured text from a recording by a software? Lots of back ends there...

 

For the cause of mh370 disappearance, you can explain it by the lost of cabin pressurization , cockpit fire, suicide scam or probably other exterior or inside mishap. The big problem is no good positioning data beacon was on the plane to find or follow it when the transponder was turned off. The pilot could have turned it off, a fire could have turned it off or other glitch like pilot doing stupid stuff while in anoxia after lost of pressurization. Radar coverage is not global, a plane with or without transponder can easily be lost. a good article explaining why:

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-02-07/why-planes-could-still-vanish-into-thin-air-like-mh370

Edited by Jon the frog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Timothy
4 minutes ago, Jon the frog said:

It's the ''Expert independent investigators'' thing that make me a little bit confuse... Which investigator ? Expert of what? Investigator for Who?

Yep if it's true is quite strange, but does this ''group of external investigator'' have access to the data that the true agency have or just public available data ? Does he talk about the true log,  translation of the log text because maybe all of it is not in english, the captured text from a recording by a software? Lots of back ends there...

 

For the cause of mh370 disappearance, you can explain it by the lost of cabin pressurization , cockpit fire, suicide scam or probably other exterior or inside mishap. The big problem is no good positioning data beacon was on the plane to find or follow it when the transponder was turned off. The pilot could have turned it off, a fire could have turned it off or other glitch like pilot doing stupid stuff while in anoxia after lost of pressurization. Radar coverage is not global, a plane with or without transponder can easily be lost. a good article explaining why:

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-02-07/why-planes-could-still-vanish-into-thin-air-like-mh370

Well that’s the crux of it. 

The data should be 100% available and verifiable. Verifiable, meaning that it is accurate and original data from a specific point of origin. 

Any changes made to the data should have been recorded and publicly released. As to negate this exact discussion we’re having. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jon the frog
1 hour ago, Timothy said:

Well that’s the crux of it. 

The data should be 100% available and verifiable. Verifiable, meaning that it is accurate and original data from a specific point of origin. 

Any changes made to the data should have been recorded and publicly released. As to negate this exact discussion we’re having. 

In all tragic story they are some people are protecting their own a**. Still, to make thing square and founded, we need to know who the ''Expert independent investigators'' cited in the article... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
paperdyer
20 hours ago, Astra. said:

Good question. The thing is tho, there are so many differing conspiracy's and opinions that surround the disappearance of this aircraft...it's difficult to know what to believe. 

CYA maybe?  Something bigger may be going on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Astra.
4 hours ago, paperdyer said:

CYA maybe?  Something bigger may be going on.

Yes, who really knows. Possibly lots of incompetency behind the scenes involved at the time....hence cover ups. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ramjett

John the frog.

An external investigator doesn't mean civilian nor does it mean it's less trustworthy than the team in charge. All report data are in both languages and de-pressurization can no longer be a factor for casualty aboard an aircraft. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Jon the frog
5 hours ago, Ramjett said:

John the frog.

An external investigator doesn't mean civilian nor does it mean it's less trustworthy than the team in charge. All report data are in both languages and de-pressurization can no longer be a factor for casualty aboard an aircraft. 

Caused some.. look for Helios Airways Flight 522 for example. A loss of cabin pressurization incapacitated the crew, leaving the aircraft flying on autopilot until it ran out of fuel and descended into the ground near Grammatiko, Greece.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SiliRat

 

"Exactly what happened to Malaysia Airlines Flight 370  (...) still remains one of the most enduring mysteries in aviation history."

You'd think that one of the 200+ aviation mysteries that have ENDURED longer than this would be considered the MOST enduring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.