Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
The Caspian Hare

Same-sex couple publicly caned in Malaysia

35 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

The Caspian Hare
Quote

 

The women, 32 and 22 years old, were supposed to have been caned on Aug 28 but had their sentences postponed to yesterday.

On Aug 12, the Syariah High Court fined the women RM3,300 and ordered that they be caned six times each for committing musahaqah (sexual relations between women) under Section 30 of the Syariah Criminal Offences Enact­ment (Takzir) (Terengganu).

The caning for such an offence is believed to be the first to be carried out in the state.

 

http://www.asiaone.com/malaysia/caning-lesbians-eye-opener-many-malaysia

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aztek

i wonder how many LGBT activist will go there fight such injustice. my guess 0

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Timothy
47 minutes ago, aztek said:

i wonder how many LGBT activist will go there fight such injustice. my guess 0

**** argument. Do you support or go against their cause? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aztek
Just now, Timothy said:

**** argument. Do you support or go against their cause? 

what cause is that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Timothy
14 minutes ago, aztek said:

what cause is that?

Equality. Did you really need me to state that? 

Edit: Removed

Edited by Timothy
Edit.
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aztek
Just now, Timothy said:

Equality. Did you really need me to state that? 

lmao, equality of what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Timothy
3 minutes ago, aztek said:

lmao, equality of what?

I’m just asking if you support gay people? 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aztek
Just now, Timothy said:

I’m just asking if you support gay people? 

should i?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Timothy
2 minutes ago, aztek said:

should i?

Some I know seem to have better morals and reasoning than you do. 

Why so stubborn?

Edit: it’s easier if you’re honest. No beating around the bush. So, go ahead if you want to. 

Edited by Timothy
Edit.
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aztek
Just now, Timothy said:

Some I know seem to have better morals and reasoning than you do. 

Why so stubborn?

 

lmao, you really think i will take your trick questions seriously and just fall for them?

why should gays get special privileges?

 

Edited by aztek

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Timothy
2 minutes ago, aztek said:

lmao, you really think i will take your trick question seriously and just fall for them?

I’m honestly sorry if I misunderstood you. 

So can you please explain your position? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aztek
Just now, Timothy said:

I’m honestly sorry if I misunderstood you. 

So can you please explain your position? 

i do not think i owe you any explanation, 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
seanjo
1 hour ago, Timothy said:

**** argument. Do you support or go against their cause? 

Do you support or go against Gay couples in Islamic States?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Timothy
2 minutes ago, aztek said:

i do not think i owe you any explanation, 

You definitely don’t owe me an explanation. 

Thats 100% correct. 

But why take part in a public discussion?

Why offer your opinion without explanation?

Why ask questions of me, which I’ll happily answer. Without response from yourself.

I just want to understand your position. 

A VPN hides your identity, but why not offer your reasoning?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Timothy
2 minutes ago, seanjo said:

Do you support or go against Gay couples in Islamic States?

 

Anyone who throws anyone else off a building because of their personal beliefs needs their issues dealt with. 

If it’s a gay or lesbian or otherwise person, trying to live their life, and respectful to others, I’m all for it. 

If you meant the question in a different way, please ask it more specifically.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aztek
Just now, Timothy said:

Why ask questions of me, which I’ll happily answer. Without response from yourself.

 

dude normally i do not read your posts, nor i respond to them much, but it was you who started it here, with you pretty aggressive post.

Edited by aztek
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
seanjo
Just now, Timothy said:

Anyone who throws anyone else off a building because of their personal beliefs needs their issues dealt with. 

If it’s a gay or lesbian or otherwise person, trying to live their life, and respectful to others, I’m all for it. 

If you meant the question in a different way, please ask it more specifically.

Why did you call aztek's argument **** when it is blatantly true? No warriors are going to go to Malaysia to protest because they know what will happen and they are cowards, they will satisfy themselves with blaming all inequality on European males and on how awful the West is.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aztek
Just now, Timothy said:

I just want to understand your position. 

 

i'm very against special treatments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Timothy
2 minutes ago, aztek said:

dude normally i do not read your posts, nor i respond to them much, but it was you who started it here, with you pretty aggressive post.

Apologies if it came off as agressive. But you’ve argued without giving any content or context. 

What’s your argument?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aztek
Just now, Timothy said:

Apologies if it came off as agressive. But you’ve argued without giving any content or context. 

What’s your argument?

 

my argument is clearly expressed in post 2, you completely missed it,   read post 17, maybe you'll get it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RoofGardener
3 minutes ago, seanjo said:

Why did you call aztek's argument **** when it is blatantly true? No warriors are going to go to Malaysia to protest because they know what will happen and they are cowards, they will satisfy themselves with blaming all inequality on European males and on how awful the West is.

I fear it is more than that Seanjo. The SJW's won't go to Malaysia because brown people - and especially muslim brown people - cannot be the oppressors. Only White people can do that. :( 

  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Timothy
2 minutes ago, seanjo said:

Why did you call aztek's argument **** when it is blatantly true? No warriors are going to go to Malaysia to protest because they know what will happen and they are cowards, they will satisfy themselves with blaming all inequality on European males and on how awful the West is.

Because I was simply trying to work out their position. 

We’re on a discussion forum. 

I’m not under any illusion that an argument wholly contained to a UM thread will have any external effect. 

I just like to know the honest opinion of someone I’m discussing with. 

What else have I missed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RoofGardener
1 minute ago, Timothy said:

Because I was simply trying to work out their position. 

We’re on a discussion forum. 

I’m not under any illusion that an argument wholly contained to a UM thread will have any external effect. 

I just like to know the honest opinion of someone I’m discussing with. 

What else have I missed?

You where challenging him to take a side on an issue,  and in a rather aggressive - and channelling - way ? :) 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
seanjo
21 minutes ago, Timothy said:

 

What else have I missed?

 

Again, you dismissed a factual statement as ****! It isn't it is the truth, I'd have thought concern that nothing will be done by the stalwarts of equality is a cause for concern and aztek is a showing support for the two Gay Women given six strokes of the cane.

Edited by seanjo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Timothy
3 minutes ago, aztek said:

my argument is clearly expressed in post 2, you completely missed it,   read post 17, maybe you'll get it

I really don’t know what you’re accurately trying to convey. I’d like to know. Maybe it’s a subtle language barrier. Continental differences maybe too. 

So, any chance you can post in plain English what your argument is?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.