Michelle Posted September 29, 2018 #101 Share Posted September 29, 2018 1 minute ago, Captain Risky said: i think they should have asked Mrs Kavanaugh what she thought... Been there done that... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unusual Tournament Posted September 29, 2018 #102 Share Posted September 29, 2018 Just now, Michelle said: Been there done that... what does that mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted September 29, 2018 #103 Share Posted September 29, 2018 1 minute ago, Lord Harry said: Christ was referring specifically to hypocrisy. He was not commanding His followers to turn a blind eye towards sin. Let he Who is without sin, cast the first stone. Jesus said that as well, now I’ve led a fairly guilt free life - but I’m not certain Im sin free, so I’m not casting any stones. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gertdoggy Posted September 29, 2018 #104 Share Posted September 29, 2018 12 minutes ago, ExpandMyMind said: WP Her word and the word of the journalist she contacted. Maybe I couldn't find it, but where in that article does it provide a date earlier then the 9th as the date Ford came forward? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michelle Posted September 29, 2018 #105 Share Posted September 29, 2018 Just now, Captain Risky said: what does that mean? They have already interviewed her and she is totally beside her husband. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Bastien Posted September 29, 2018 #106 Share Posted September 29, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Harry Posted September 29, 2018 #107 Share Posted September 29, 2018 2 minutes ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said: Let he Who is without sin, cast the first stone. Jesus said that as well, now I’ve led a fairly guilt free life - but I’m not certain Im sin free, so I’m not casting any stones. You know neither the Scriptural nor historical context for those verses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unusual Tournament Posted September 29, 2018 #108 Share Posted September 29, 2018 Just now, Michelle said: They have already interviewed her and she is totally beside her husband. it goes without saying since she showed up to his hearing. but she didn't look happy and in fact very defensive. her body language spoke differently to her husband. at least thats what i got outta it. but i take it you're team Kavanaugh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Bastien Posted September 29, 2018 #109 Share Posted September 29, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michelle Posted September 29, 2018 #110 Share Posted September 29, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Captain Risky said: it goes without saying since she showed up to his hearing. but she didn't look happy and in fact very defensive. her body language spoke differently to her husband. at least thats what i got outta it. but i take it you're team Kavanaugh? Her entire family has been getting death threats including the kids. I'd be p***ed if someone was putting my husband through this and dragging the whole family into it too. I think you are misplacing her anger and resentment to represent what you want it to mean. I am team evidence. Edited September 29, 2018 by Michelle 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExpandMyMind Posted September 29, 2018 #111 Share Posted September 29, 2018 8 minutes ago, Gertdoggy said: Maybe I couldn't find it, but where in that article does it provide a date earlier then the 9th as the date Ford came forward? In the part I quoted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Bastien Posted September 29, 2018 #112 Share Posted September 29, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lost_shaman Posted September 29, 2018 #113 Share Posted September 29, 2018 3 minutes ago, ExpandMyMind said: In the part I quoted. There is no Date listed. It was just her word. Also the NYT's could not confirm that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unusual Tournament Posted September 29, 2018 #114 Share Posted September 29, 2018 1 minute ago, Michelle said: Her entire family has been getting death threats including the kids. I'd be p***ed if someone was putting my husband through this and dragging the whole family into it too. I think you are misplacing her anger and resentment to represent what you want it to mean. i see your point. and you're probably right about me looking at this through my left leaning glasses. its the lying that gets me the most. why doesn't he just say that he drank a bit read the signs wrong and made a pass. instead, he gets to shout louder than his accused and drags his family into the fray. and anyone could be giving him death threats. for all we know it could be someone looking to portray him as a victim. i mean if he becomes one of the top judges then his politics and religious views are still going to be drawing threats and insults for nut jobs anyway. so do those soon to be threats mean nothing to his wife? i think he's a forceful and competitive character and has been for most of his life and his wife knows it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Bastien Posted September 29, 2018 #115 Share Posted September 29, 2018 Anyway, lets see what the next freak show that humanity gives us next for entertainment. The "stupid" gene has been expressing itself to much as of late. This will all be next years dead horse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Jim Posted September 29, 2018 #116 Share Posted September 29, 2018 13 minutes ago, Captain Risky said: why doesn't he just say that he drank a bit read the signs wrong and made a pass. Perhaps because it's not true. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unusual Tournament Posted September 29, 2018 #117 Share Posted September 29, 2018 Just now, Big Jim said: Perhaps because it's not true. well you'd hope its not true since he's gonna be entrusted with an important job. i.e. to be truthful for the rest of his professional life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExpandMyMind Posted September 29, 2018 #118 Share Posted September 29, 2018 25 minutes ago, lost_shaman said: There is no Date listed. It was just her word. Also the NYT's could not confirm that. I think we can assume that 'before he got the nomination' (paraphrasing) means sometime before he was nominated. And that came directly from the journalist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted September 29, 2018 #119 Share Posted September 29, 2018 (edited) Get over it the Demos are going to try and drown Kavanaugh and hope he can get it through it. Edited September 29, 2018 by docyabut2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lost_shaman Posted September 29, 2018 #120 Share Posted September 29, 2018 3 minutes ago, ExpandMyMind said: And that came directly from the journalist. So? The Journalist is just parroting her. As I said the NYT's couldn't confirm any of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExpandMyMind Posted September 29, 2018 #121 Share Posted September 29, 2018 It'll be interesting to see what Avenatti brings to the table. Say what you will about his abrasive persona, he has a 100% record so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted September 29, 2018 #122 Share Posted September 29, 2018 42 minutes ago, Lord Harry said: You know neither the Scriptural nor historical context for those verses. Let’s see, The World Of The Text has Jesus coming across a group of hypocrites about to stone a woman to death as a result of very specific and pointed interpretations of the Torah. The World Behind The Text is from a time when the powerful manipulated the law and the interpretation of the law in order to maintain their power and wealth. I can can see how the situation clearly doesn’t apply here, so I’ll recuse myself with the most abject apology. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExpandMyMind Posted September 29, 2018 #123 Share Posted September 29, 2018 2 minutes ago, lost_shaman said: So? The Journalist is just parroting her. As I said the NYT's couldn't confirm any of that. Eh, the journalist from the outlet she contacted is just parroting her? You don't think said journalist would be in the perfect position to verify when her own newspaper was contacted? Contact that initiated her writing her story? I mean, whaaat? Of course the WP would know when they were contacted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent0range Posted September 29, 2018 #124 Share Posted September 29, 2018 41 minutes ago, Michelle said: Her entire family has been getting death threats including the kids. I'd be p***ed if someone was putting my husband through this and dragging the whole family into it too. I think you are misplacing her anger and resentment to represent what you want it to mean. I am team evidence. Have both families not been getting death threats? I'd be more p***ed if your husband put someone through an attempted sexual assault. I mean, it's pretty clear he was a heavy drinker and partier throughout his teen years. He even claimed, falsely, that he was drinking legally in Maryland at the time. He asked a Senator if she ever blacked out while drinking and couldn't remember what she had done...I don't believe him. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Harry Posted September 29, 2018 #125 Share Posted September 29, 2018 1 minute ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said: Let’s see, The World Of The Text has Jesus coming across a group of hypocrites about to stone a woman to death as a result of very specific and pointed interpretations of the Torah. The World Behind The Text is from a time when the powerful manipulated the law and the interpretation of the law in order to maintain their power and wealth. I can can see how the situation clearly doesn’t apply here, so I’ll recuse myself with the most abject apology. Incorrect. The Torah stated that those caught in adultery, both the man and the woman, were to be brought before the elders to be stoned. Notice in this verse only the woman was present. Where was the man? Perhaps the man was one of the Pharisees who brought the woman before Jesus. Also during the First Century AD, Judea was under Roman rule. Only the Roman authorities were permitted to carry out the death penalty. Notice also that the verse says the religious leaders did this so they could have means to accuse Jesus. If Jesus said to stone the woman, then he would have been in violation of Roman law. If he said to let the woman go, then he would have been in violation of Jewish Law. Thus he broke neither Roman nor Jewish Law by saying "he that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts