zep73 Posted October 9, 2018 #1 Share Posted October 9, 2018 (edited) According to this (questionable) scientific article, the Neanderthals were merely pre-flood humans, closer related to Adam than us. And they even have the evidence (?) to support it! http://www.genesisandgenetics.org/2013/11/08/177/ Question is: Can their evidence withstand scientific scrutiny? Edited October 9, 2018 by sci-nerd 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danydandan Posted October 9, 2018 #2 Share Posted October 9, 2018 Seriously? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zep73 Posted October 9, 2018 Author #3 Share Posted October 9, 2018 2 minutes ago, danydandan said: Seriously? My first though too!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trelane Posted October 9, 2018 #4 Share Posted October 9, 2018 Oh my, oh dear.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenoFish Posted October 9, 2018 #5 Share Posted October 9, 2018 Do we really have to discuss this? 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danydandan Posted October 9, 2018 #6 Share Posted October 9, 2018 Nope. I'm compelled to ask what was the Ops reasoning for posting it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenoFish Posted October 9, 2018 #7 Share Posted October 9, 2018 3 minutes ago, danydandan said: Nope. I'm compelled to ask what was the Ops reasoning for posting it. I literally felt my IQ dropping as I started to read the link. Think it gave me brain damage. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danydandan Posted October 9, 2018 #8 Share Posted October 9, 2018 2 minutes ago, XenoFish said: I literally felt my IQ dropping as I started to read the link. Think it gave me brain damage. It was the question and answer section that got me. Read the first comment under the 'article' too. That's FAF. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenoFish Posted October 9, 2018 #9 Share Posted October 9, 2018 Just now, danydandan said: It was the question and answer section that got me. Read the first comment under the 'article' too. That's FAF. Same here. Looks like another attempt to validate the bible. Again..... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essan Posted October 9, 2018 #10 Share Posted October 9, 2018 This is a spoof website, right? Please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zep73 Posted October 9, 2018 Author #11 Share Posted October 9, 2018 At least we had a good laugh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenoFish Posted October 9, 2018 #12 Share Posted October 9, 2018 11 minutes ago, sci-nerd said: At least we had a good laugh! Well no. More sad than anything, because I know there are people out there that will believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zep73 Posted October 9, 2018 Author #13 Share Posted October 9, 2018 29 minutes ago, danydandan said: I'm compelled to ask what was the Ops reasoning for posting it. 1 minute ago, XenoFish said: Well no. More sad than anything, because I know there are people out there that will believe it. Even the more reason for us to analyse the "data" and disprove it. That is a thing this place is good at. Then when people google neanderthals and the bible, they might go here, instead of there. But, if you're not up for it, then... to bad... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnoferox Posted October 9, 2018 #14 Share Posted October 9, 2018 Creationist "science" publications are so damn funny to read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saru Posted October 9, 2018 #15 Share Posted October 9, 2018 Closed by OP's request. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts