Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
susieice

Stormy Daniels' Case Thrown Out

95 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Farmer77
1 hour ago, RoofGardener said:

Hmmm..... so lets see.. we have a porn start who sleeps around, who tried to make money by breaking an agreement and smearing the president, and who's case has been highly promoted by the left-wing media ? 

Nope.. can't see anything sleazy THERE. Nothing for Democrat voters to feel uneasy about ? 

Oh.. and Avenatti.. or however you spell it. You know how he immediately vowed to appeal the decision to the 9th Circuit ? 

Well.. so far.. he hasn't. What does THAT tell us about the strength of his case, kiddies ? 

Sigh......... i was referring to Bee's comment that 'making fun of his manhood' would be the deciding factor for some voters because it would alienate men by 'stirring insecurities'.....if you're a man and you're that sensitive to that particular issue , im gonna have some fun at your expense. :tu:

Overall sure the issue of sleazy tactics absolutely could result in folks voting one way or another. Conversely so could the issue of morality.

 

Edited by Farmer77

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RoofGardener
18 minutes ago, Farmer77 said:

Sigh......... i was referring to Bee's comment that 'making fun of his manhood' would be the deciding factor for some voters because it would alienate men by 'stirring insecurities'.....if you're a man and you're that sensitive to that particular issue , im gonna have some fun at your expense. :tu:

Overall sure the issue of sleazy tactics absolutely could result in folks voting one way or another. Conversely so could the issue of morality.

 

Hmm.. fair enough. 

Morality ? In a situation invovling Stormy/Allivante vs Trump ? 

Hmmm. 

 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Farmer77
1 minute ago, RoofGardener said:

Morality ? In a situation invovling Stormy/Allivante vs Trump ? 

No not juxtaposing Trump vs anyone else, just simply examining Trump's actions. It appears he is slowly starting to lose evangelicals and without the fear of Hillary there is a chance that many of them will stay home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aztek

i predict quite the opposite, for simple reason everything democrats\liberals predicted so far, turned out completely opposite.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
acidhead

Warren and her horse, Stormy.

 

FB_IMG_1539831414036.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
skliss

Here's the thing that everyone misses. The press were not reporting a "win" for Trump. They were ignoring it on purpose because, ya know, Trump..... So Trump tweets "horseface" and the media can't report fast enough. His win is every where and he lowers his opponents marketability at the same time.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aztek

yes pretty much, and he does not have to put any effort into it either, just tell the truth, and do the right thing for America. which is exactly what he is doing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
acidhead

Google: Michael Avenatti

lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hammerclaw
Farmer77

Personally im glad this case was tossed. Let the sideshow fade away and the real legal battles begin.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
skliss

It should be obvious to anyone that this guy is an ambulance chaser of the worst sort yet amazingly he's been celebrated by the Democrat party. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ExpandMyMind
10 hours ago, Hammerclaw said:

It appears that this came from the same guy who previously tried to pay women to fabricate accusations against Mueller, Jacob Wohl.

If not, and he did hit whoever this woman is, then I'm sure he'll get what he deserves. He has been bailed today.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stardrive

The #metoo champion gets arreested on domestic abuse charges. So, should we just believe all women? or should we wait and see what happens when it goes to court? 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ExpandMyMind
5 minutes ago, Stardrive said:

The #metoo champion gets arreested on domestic abuse charges. So, should we just believe all women? or should we wait and see what happens when it goes to court? 

The main difference is that Avenatti is not an elected representative of the people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ExpandMyMind

There's also this:

Quote

But soon after the arrest was made public, a supposed private investigation firm — Surefire Intelligence — directly connected to Wohl and his attempt to frame Mueller, posted a cryptic message to its own Twitterfeed. The post linked to a news report of Avenatti’s arrest, and contained the comment, “Surefire Intelligence strikes again.”

https://www.inquisitr.com/5163540/jacob-wohl-robert-mueller-michael-avenatti-arrest/

So, the guy who was caught trying to fabricate accusations against Mueller, weeks later claims credit for accusations against Avenatti. 

Edited by ExpandMyMind

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stardrive

Not my point. I say wait for it to go to trial before we paint him as guilty of any charges.

Edited by Stardrive
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aztek

i have doubts there was a real abuse, it is not unheard of females to lie about it for many reasons, some do it on purpose, to have a leverage during divorce, and custody hearings,  i agree let the court decide. but it sure did hurt his chances of running for presidency in 2020 lol

Edited by aztek

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ExpandMyMind
17 minutes ago, aztek said:

i have doubts there was a real abuse, it is not unheard of females to lie about it for many reasons, some do it on purpose, to have a leverage during divorce, and custody hearings,  i agree let the court decide. but it sure did hurt his chances of running for presidency in 2020 lol

I think we've found our resident incel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hammerclaw
3 hours ago, ExpandMyMind said:

It appears that this came from the same guy who previously tried to pay women to fabricate accusations against Mueller, Jacob Wohl.

If not, and he did hit whoever this woman is, then I'm sure he'll get what he deserves. He has been bailed today.

 

The Titanic only saw the tip of the iceberg.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
and then
On 10/17/2018 at 10:00 PM, acidhead said:

Warren and her horse, Stormy.

 

FB_IMG_1539831414036.jpg

Some warning next time, please?  I just inhaled diet coke  :w00t:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
and then
2 hours ago, Stardrive said:

Not my point. I say wait for it to go to trial before we paint him as guilty of any charges.

Absolutely correct!  EVERYONE, no matter how disgusting they may be perceived by some, has the presumption of innocence until it is proved otherwise.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ExpandMyMind
9 minutes ago, and then said:

Absolutely correct!  EVERYONE, no matter how disgusting they may be perceived by some, has the presumption of innocence until it is proved otherwise.

Strange that you don't seem to think that this applies to Hillary. Or any Democrat come to think of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hammerclaw
5 minutes ago, ExpandMyMind said:

Strange that you don't seem to think that this applies to Hillary. Or any Democrat come to think of it.

Sauce for the goose. In any event, it would take more than an unsubstantiated allegation for the LAPD to actually arrest him.

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/11/15/was-avenatti-set-up/

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stardrive
3 hours ago, ExpandMyMind said:

The main difference is that Avenatti is not an elected representative of the people.

Neither was Trump at the time when all of this happened.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stardrive
8 minutes ago, Hammerclaw said:

Sauce for the goose. In any event, it would take more than an unsubstantiated allegation for the LAPD to actually arrest him.

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/11/15/was-avenatti-set-up/

I read he's been charged with a felony.  They must have some serious evidence against him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.