Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
susieice

Stormy Daniels' Case Thrown Out

95 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

ExpandMyMind
25 minutes ago, Stardrive said:

Neither was Trump at the time when all of this happened.

When Trump was accused? He was running for President...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Buzz_Light_Year
25 minutes ago, ExpandMyMind said:

Strange that you don't seem to think that this applies to Hillary. Or any Democrat come to think of it.

She had a unsecured private server conducting official business.

Executive Order 13526 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) of the federal code make it unlawful to send of store classified information on personal email.

Section 1236.22 of the 2009 National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)

Violation of the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA)

This is not a case of whether or not she may have, but she did violate these and she wasn't held to account.....because..........Oh heck let your mind run wild with this. ;)

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ExpandMyMind
34 minutes ago, Hammerclaw said:

Sauce for the goose. In any event, it would take more than an unsubstantiated allegation for the LAPD to actually arrest him.

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/11/15/was-avenatti-set-up/

The LAPD automatically arrest anyone accused of domestic abuse. It's the law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stardrive
4 minutes ago, ExpandMyMind said:

When Trump was accused? He was running for President...

No, when the deal went down he was a civilian, not an elected official.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ExpandMyMind
5 minutes ago, Buzz_Light_Year said:

She had a unsecured private server conducting official business.

Executive Order 13526 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) of the federal code make it unlawful to send of store classified information on personal email.

Section 1236.22 of the 2009 National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)

Violation of the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA)

This is not a case of whether or not she may have, but she did violate these and she wasn't held to account.....because..........Oh heck let your mind run wild with this. ;)

 

When is the trial?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ExpandMyMind
Just now, Stardrive said:

No, when the deal went down he was a civilian, not an elected official.

Wait, what deal are we talking about here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stardrive

 

Just now, ExpandMyMind said:

Wait, what deal are we talking about here?

You know, I give you money for a romp in the hay. That all happened before he was an elected official. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hammerclaw
7 minutes ago, ExpandMyMind said:

The LAPD automatically arrest anyone accused of domestic abuse. It's the law.

Nott without evidence. This was a real time event, with a freshly battered woman and her assailant trying to intervene. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hammerclaw
35 minutes ago, Stardrive said:

I read he's been charged with a felony.  They must have some serious evidence against him.

It was standing in front of them.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ExpandMyMind
5 minutes ago, Stardrive said:

 

You know, I give you money for a romp in the hay. That all happened before he was an elected official. 

You mean with Daniels?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ExpandMyMind
5 minutes ago, Hammerclaw said:

Nott without evidence. This was a real time event, with a freshly battered woman and her assailant trying to intervene. 

'When a peace officer is responding to a call alleging a violation of a domestic violence protective or restraining order issued under Section 527.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Family Code, Section 136.2, 646.91, or paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 1203.097 of this code, Section 213.5 or 15657.03 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.... .... the officer shall, consistent with subdivision (b) of Section 13701, make a lawful arrest of the person without a warrant and take that person into custody whether or not the violation occurred in the presence of the arresting officer.'

They're required to make an automatic arrest without any evidence other than the accusation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aztek
Just now, Hammerclaw said:

Nott without evidence. This was a real time event, with a freshly battered woman and her assailant trying to intervene. 

unfortunately they really do not need any evidence beyond a report,  they do not necessarily will look for you to arrest, they will call you and ask to come for an interview to a police station,  once you are there 99% you will be arrested, you never go to such interviews without a lawyer.

of course if there is a beat up women right in front of them it is a different story

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lord Harry

Say, whatever happened to my good buddy @Aquila King

I miss talking with the guy.  He was such a font of political wisdom and sanity.  A good old fashioned, red blooded American patriot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
acidhead

Michael Avenatti Got Arrested

MAGA 

Lolololololol

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stardrive
32 minutes ago, Hammerclaw said:

It was standing in front of them.

No doubt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stardrive
33 minutes ago, ExpandMyMind said:

You mean with Daniels?

Yeah. That didn't happen when he was in office.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ExpandMyMind
1 minute ago, Stardrive said:

Yeah. That didn't happen when he was in office.

Right. And why does that matter? No one has any issue with him sleeping with Stormy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Farmer77
9 hours ago, Buzz_Light_Year said:

Maybe sooner then you think.

https://dailycaller.com/2018/11/15/federal-court-clinton-more-questions-emai

She has to answer questions about her emails and her server setup.

Hey thats good stuff!

Based on the two questions I dont think it will actually go anywhere but its nice to see this being pursued to a final end.

DsDW36hU4AANG5O.jpg:large

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tatetopa
On 10/16/2018 at 4:09 PM, OverSword said:

Cry me a river.  They're public figures, one is a despicable un-humorus comic who I despised waaaay before the whole trump head thing (incase you think that's why I don't like her) and the other is a porn star/over priced prostitute.  Oh but whatever you do don't disparage women because they are delicate and perfect and don't fart. Go find something offensive to be offended by.

This is kind of a load of crap. Neither all women nor all men are pillars of respectability.  They are neither delicate not perfect but they deserve to be treated as people not locker room jokes by you and Yeti Pubes.  The reason I am angry at Stormy is that I can never play Mario Karts again without thinking of the President.  What an awful fate.  No escape.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Impedancer

This is one stormy case... I remember all the fuss when Clinton had his little fling with Monica Lewinsky :-)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
skliss
58 minutes ago, Avalanche said:

This is one stormy case... I remember all the fuss when Clinton had his little fling with Monica Lewinsky :-)

Yeah but he did that on my time, on my dime in a house paid for by we the people...not to mention the house he was living in with his wife and daughter at the time. The most prestigious room in the most prestigious building in the world used to overwhelm a young, innocent girl. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OverSword
17 hours ago, Tatetopa said:

This is kind of a load of crap. Neither all women nor all men are pillars of respectability.  They are neither delicate not perfect but they deserve to be treated as people not locker room jokes by you and Yeti Pubes.  The reason I am angry at Stormy is that I can never play Mario Karts again without thinking of the President.  What an awful fate.  No escape.

Excuse me when did I make a locker room joke about the prostitute or the un-funny comic?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tatetopa
4 hours ago, OverSword said:

Excuse me when did I make a locker room joke about the prostitute or the un-funny comic?

Well, I guess the jokes on me.  You didn't I put my foot right into it.  Sorry I boxed you in with the type that looks down on women.   

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OverSword
11 hours ago, Tatetopa said:

Well, I guess the jokes on me.  You didn't I put my foot right into it.  Sorry I boxed you in with the type that looks down on women.   

No biggie brother 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.