Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Kavanaugh Accuser Admits To Lying


susieice

Recommended Posts

More politics. The FBI concluded it's investigation and found no evidence against Kavanaugh. Now the women are admitting they lied. They are being referred to the DOJ.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/nov/3/another-kavanaugh-accuser-admits-fabricating-rape-/

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/254225

FOX-

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-challenges-dems-after-kavanaugh-accuser-allegedly-admits-to-making-false-rape-claim

CNN- No report I can find.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 5
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This should be front page, like the original claims were, but noooOOooo.

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Not A Rockstar said:

This should be front page, like the original claims were, but noooOOooo.

Unless you happen on it, you will not know. At least until the DOJ decides if it will take action. Media will not report this until they have no choice, probably after the election.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am 50-50 on if DOJ will do anything at all. 

Actually, that is me being optimistic.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your headline is EXTREMELY misleading.  The accuser did not admit to lying, the woman admitted to NOT being the accuser.  Facts matter.

Edited by Agent0range
  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Agent0range said:

Your headline is EXTREMELY misleading.  The accuser did not admit to lying, the women admitted to NOT being the accuser.  Facts matter.

Which one?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, susieice said:

Which one?

The title of your thread.  First of all, you say accusers...when this is one woman.  The woman claimed to be the author of a Jane Doe letter.  She did not admit to lying in the letter, she admitted to not being the author of the letter.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Agent0range said:

The title of your thread.  First of all, you say accusers...when this is one woman.  The woman claimed to be the author of a Jane Doe letter.  She did not admit to lying in the letter, she admitted to not being the author of the letter.

Read the article, two women are being investigated for lying.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Agent0range said:

The title of your thread.  First of all, you say accusers...when this is one woman.  The woman claimed to be the author of a Jane Doe letter.  She did not admit to lying in the letter, she admitted to not being the author of the letter.

Please read. I'm against any woman falsely accusing a man of something like this, no matter who it is! As for what's being reported, me and my thread are irrelevant. It's up to the DOJ to investigate this now. Seems that's where the FBI investigation led. Don't know their findings.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kittens Are Jerks said:

Where in that article does it state that Dr Ford has admitted to lying?

It doesn't.  Only one woman admitted to lying, lying in the fact that she wrote the Jane Doe letter.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kittens Are Jerks said:

Where in that article does it state that Dr Ford has admitted to lying?

They didn't say she did. They said it's being investigated after the FBI investigation ended. Who would expect anything but an argument?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Agent0range said:

It doesn't.  Only one woman admitted to lying, lying in the fact that she wrote the Jane Doe letter.

I know it doesn't. I read the article. It would appear, however, that the person who posted it, did not.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Agent0range said:

Ford was the only woman to testify to congress.

Others made accusations.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, susieice said:

They didn't say she did. They said it's being investigated after the FBI investigation ended. Who would expect anything but an argument?

Dr Ford is not being investigated.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, susieice said:

Others made accusations.

OK?  And?  You can't be investigated for perjury if you don't testify under oath...so what exactly is being investigated?  Kavanaugh can go after them for defamation if he wants to...but you can't lie to congress if you didn't talk to congress...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kittens Are Jerks said:

Dr Ford is not being investigated.

Please read! I'm not here to argue. I'm just saying they are being referred to the DOJ. I guess we wait and see what happens.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Agent0range said:

OK?  And?  You can't be investigated for perjury if you don't testify under oath...so what exactly is being investigated?  Kavanaugh can go after them for defamation if he wants to...but you can't lie to congress if you didn't talk to congress...

I don't know. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, susieice said:

I don't know. 

I know you don't...Grassley knows it too.  This is just pre-midterm politics, because they know their supporters won't conduct the critical thinking needed to see this is just a distraction.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, susieice said:

Please read! I'm not here to argue. I'm just saying they are being referred to the DOJ. I guess we wait and see what happens.

I AM reading. You're not being at all clear with some of your posts. \

You write Dr Ford too and linked to an article from The Hill - an article which only makes a fleeting reference to Dr. Ford.

So Dr Ford too what exactly?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kittens Are Jerks said:

I AM reading. You're not being at all clear with some of your posts. \

You write Dr Ford too and linked to an article from The Hill - an article which only makes a fleeting reference to Dr. Ford.

So Dr Ford too what exactly?

I didn't write the articles! Read them! I expected an argument, but the fact is we'll have to wait to see what the FBI found and why this is being referred to the DOJ. Don't know what was found. The Supreme Court is under the DOJ. We all get to wait to see what happens. Can you understand this?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Likely Guy said:

This thread has gone in so many circles that I'm getting dizzy. :wacko:

You should know what to expect by now. Just read the articles. It's all anyone knows.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.