Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

California wildfire leaves town in ruins


Still Waters

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Gromdor said:

I think you answered your question with the mostly uninhabited part.  California's fires aren't being caused by routine lightning strikes but rather by man made sources.

It’s not as if we lack for ****s who either like to see things burn or simply toss their still lit ciggies out the window of their cars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
30 minutes ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said:

It’s not as if we lack for ****s who either like to see things burn or simply toss their still lit ciggies out the window of their cars.

https://helpwithtrafficticket.com/vc-23111/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 18.11.2018 at 8:56 AM, NicoletteS said:

To rake and thin the forests. Because finland does and they dont have this problem. Do you realise how much forest there is?

Do you really believe that the people in Finland rake their forests? :lol:

Thats nonsense! Its well known that the Fins use vacuum cleaners to clean up their forests (1 time a week)

Quote

The people of Finland have reacted with bemusement on social media at Donald Trump’s assertions that the country rakes its forests to help prevent forest fires

Speaking on Saturday in Paradise, California, about the role of forest management in stemming wildfires, Trump said: “I was with the president of Finland and he said: ‘We have, much different, we are a forest nation.’ He called it a forest nation. And they spend a lot of time on raking and cleaning and doing things, and they don’t have any problem.”

There were also people on hand to point out that the factors affecting whether there are forest fires are very different in California and Finland:

More / The Guardian

Still anyone out there who think he isnt an idiot? Really?

Edited by toast
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DsSFxsSWwAAJCzo.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said:

Aand??

Sorry. Just showed a link to the high fine imposed if someone throws a lit cigarette out of a car window. I probably should have written something. It's not something you want to get caught doing. But you're right. There are people who like to see things burn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They aren't raking.

https://e360.yale.edu/features/fighting-fire-with-fire-california-turns-to-prescribed-burning

And in case anyone actually reads these, here's NOAA's link to California's rainfall in 2016-2017.

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/featured-images/very-wet-2017-water-year-ends-california

Edited by susieice
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Saw this today: https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/13/us/pge-camp-fire-report-outages/index.html

The broken hook was probably the start of the fire.  Article doesn't really say if it was deliberate or not.

Someone going all 2nd amendment on the second tower is definitely deliberate.  This whole fire could be the result of vandalism/terrorism.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Gromdor said:

Saw this today: https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/13/us/pge-camp-fire-report-outages/index.html

The broken hook was probably the start of the fire.  Article doesn't really say if it was deliberate or not.

Someone going all 2nd amendment on the second tower is definitely deliberate.  This whole fire could be the result of vandalism/terrorism.

According to Sacramento news, they found this in several locations in the area.

https://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2018/12/12/pge-bullet-holes-camp-fire/

Here's the letter PG&E sent about their investigation. They found this on November 6th but just released the information.

http://dig.abclocal.go.com/kgo/PDF/121118-pge-camp-fire-letter-to-cpuc.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry. Need to correct. PG&E knew on November 8th about the bullet holes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 If you believe this is some kind of sign or warning, then surely the first that comes to mind is Paradise Lost. 

If you believe it’s just a coincidence, then by all means, build again.

But if you believe the end of Manifest Destiny, which was announced plainly, means that California is now a forbidden zone, it would be better to depart now, while property values are still high.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
 
54 minutes ago, acidhead said:

:D 

 

With rakes by any chance?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I drove between Sisters and Salem last month.  Detroit was just a tent city.  I was surprised that they were rebuilding.  (Oregon)

As long as people keep insisting on building their houses in the middle of the forest, we are going to see more of this.

As for California, they regularly spend hundreds of millions trying to thin but it only marginally seems to help.  (But then again, 42 million people wanting to live their and putting their houses everywhere...)  Trump had four years to rake the federal lands to showed that it worked but strangely never did so.  Especially considering 57% of the forests are federally owned in California.  This year doesn't seem so bad so far but with the extreme drought, water shortage, and high temperatures I can see Californians biting their nails and throwing as much money as they can at the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gromdor said:

I drove between Sisters and Salem last month.  Detroit was just a tent city.  I was surprised that they were rebuilding.  (Oregon)

As long as people keep insisting on building their houses in the middle of the forest, we are going to see more of this.

As for California, they regularly spend hundreds of millions trying to thin but it only marginally seems to help.  (But then again, 42 million people wanting to live their and putting their houses everywhere...)  Trump had four years to rake the federal lands to showed that it worked but strangely never did so.  Especially considering 57% of the forests are federally owned in California.  This year doesn't seem so bad so far but with the extreme drought, water shortage, and high temperatures I can see Californians biting their nails and throwing as much money as they can at the problem.

Thats just how the cascade towns are. They won't quit from a little fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said:

With rakes by any chance?

And, just like clockwork, California goes full retard:

  • But Los Padres ForestWatch conservation director Bryant Baker warns that controlled burns threaten the native plant areas of SoCal’s national forests 
  • These people can't even get out of their own way when trying to be sensible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, and then said:

And, just like clockwork, California goes full retard:

  • But Los Padres ForestWatch conservation director Bryant Baker warns that controlled burns threaten the native plant areas of SoCal’s national forests 
  • These people can't even get out of their own way when trying to be sensible.

What sort of Indigenous fire management was going on in California before the Spanish turned up? We’re (very slowly) learning to adopt Aboriginal Fire Manegement here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.