Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Climate change reversal 'relatively inexpensive'


UM-Bot

Recommended Posts

  • The title was changed to Climate change reversal 'relatively inexpensive'
Quote

stratospheric aerosol injection

AKA "Chem trails". Between this and the JFK reports confirming multiple shooters and a cover up, tin foil hatters are slowly becoming vindicated. Next stop: rewriting history to include an advanced civilization wiped out by cataclysm. Hey, what sounds crazy today could be confirmed tomorrow. This the chaos plane of reality we seem to be living in where anything and everything is possible. Apparently even Government sponsored human crop dusting

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, UM-Bot said:

A geoengineering technique known as stratospheric aerosol injection could reverse global warming.

https://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/news/323531/climate-change-reversal-relatively-inexpensive

This has been rejected on a number of levels .... 

From 2008:  https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-hidden-dangers-of-geoengineering

 

2015: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/feb/11/is-geoengineering-a-bad-idea-climate-change

And more recently: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/08/180808134302.htm
 

Basically, it ain't gonna happen, even if the monetary cost were zero.    So the US may as well give up Diego Garcia (the most obvious western military airfield from which to carry out such an operation, as it's close to the equator where spreading would be most effective) :D

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, seanjo said:

Chemtrails are the myth that Jet Engines are being used to pump chemicals into the atmosphere, they aren't, apart from the normal product of combusting Kerosene in a jet engine. What they are talking about is seeding the atmosphere with something that reflects the Sun's energy to cool down the Planet.

Chemtrails are not a myth. That is like saying cancer is a myth.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the Purpose of Chemtrails

Chemtrails are a huge logistical operation. 

Larger than the Hoover Dam, Trans-Alaska pipeline or moon landing. It's larger. And expensive. The biggest mistake one can make is assuming there is only one reason for chemtrails. There are about five or six reasons and possibly more. 

The top six are listed below with a brief summary.

 

 

 

  • Blocking the Sun

    This is the standard reason given to idiots in the government. We need to secretly stop global warming, so keep it a secret that we're spraying. Global warming is the catch all con for everyone in the government. If you're smarter than this they'll give you a better reason.

     

  • Blocking the Sun (Again)

    A reduction in sun light across the planet works well to decrease crop yields slightly. This is part of the requirement to engineer a food crisis and bring in a famine. This is tied in with the disappearing bees too but this site does not get into that.

     

  • Superheating the Atmosphere

    In order to create earthquakes and steer hurricanes (for example hurricane Katrina in New Orleans) the atmosphere needs to be more conductive for electricity so installations such as HAARP can work their magic.

     

    So the chemtrails spray barium and aluminum among other things to create a more conductive upper atmosphere.

     

  • Health Erosion

    As a side effect everyone's health and immune systems become more compromised. This is usually not an issue for most healthy people.

     

    Older people on average will now die sooner and any health complication is slightly more likely to be fatal. This is both a side effect of spraying and intentional. Anything to increase the kill rate without raising many alarm bells.

     

  • Climate Modification

    To help or hurt crops, keep skies clear for a major event (like the Olympics), cause a typhoon, etc.

     

  • Nano-fiber Propagation

    To universally install a BioAPI in everyone they need to spray nano-fibers.

     

    These fibers cannot be put into the food supply or given in some other way, the uptake across the population would take forever and not propagate very efficiently.

     

    It's much easily just to spray everyone like an insect; and because it's happening to everyone and universal the herd mentality of the unwashed masses then justifies it.

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_chemtrails32.htm

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole idea has "unintended consequences" written all over it.  There are many smaller undertakings where we have shown that we do not have the foresight to match our abilities.  Just as an example, what happens when, after spending years replicating the effects of a major volcanic eruption, we actually have a major volcanic eruption?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the proposal is to fix it with chemtrails, precisely what theorists say the have already ilegaly been doing. Okay. IMO attempts to engineer our atmosphere is not advisable. There are so many factors contributing to climate that nobody has the right to risk possible unintended consequences on behalf of every other living creature on the face of the earth. The best option is to modify our behavior and the types of technology we use to have less negative effects on the planet.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Truthseeker007 said:

Chemtrails are not a myth. That is like saying cancer is a myth.

Chemtrails are like saying rainbows cause cancer.

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OverSword said:

So the proposal is to fix it with chemtrails, precisely what theorists say the have already ilegaly been doing. Okay. IMO attempts to engineer our atmosphere is not advisable. There are so many factors contributing to climate that nobody has the right to risk possible unintended consequences on behalf of every other living creature on the face of the earth. The best option is to modify our behavior and the types of technology we use to have less negative effects on the planet.

No, there is no proposal and chemtrails are as real as flying unicorns.  Pink.  Mostly about 4ft in height.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Essan said:

No, there is no proposal and chemtrails are as real as flying unicorns.  Pink.  Mostly about 4ft in height.

No proposal? Then what is the article about? Someone is proposing that what amounts to chemtrailing could cool the climate. And please read. When did I say chemtrails are real? I will say they could easily become reality and I’m sure the level of technology to do so has existed for over fifty years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Trenix said:

Playing with stuff like this will cause a global catastrophe in which can end mankind. This should be illegal.

Maybe not will cause, but certainly may have unintended side effects that could make things worse rather than better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

chem trail people and flat earth people both go to the same conventions

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Truthseeker007 said:

What is the Purpose of Chemtrails

Chemtrails are a huge logistical operation. 

Larger than the Hoover Dam, Trans-Alaska pipeline or moon landing. It's larger. And expensive. The biggest mistake one can make is assuming there is only one reason for chemtrails. There are about five or six reasons and possibly more. 

The top six are listed below with a brief summary.

 

 

 

  • Blocking the Sun

    This is the standard reason given to idiots in the government. We need to secretly stop global warming, so keep it a secret that we're spraying. Global warming is the catch all con for everyone in the government. If you're smarter than this they'll give you a better reason.

     

  • Blocking the Sun (Again)

    A reduction in sun light across the planet works well to decrease crop yields slightly. This is part of the requirement to engineer a food crisis and bring in a famine. This is tied in with the disappearing bees too but this site does not get into that.

     

  • Superheating the Atmosphere

    In order to create earthquakes and steer hurricanes (for example hurricane Katrina in New Orleans) the atmosphere needs to be more conductive for electricity so installations such as HAARP can work their magic.

     

    So the chemtrails spray barium and aluminum among other things to create a more conductive upper atmosphere.

     

  • Health Erosion

    As a side effect everyone's health and immune systems become more compromised. This is usually not an issue for most healthy people.

     

    Older people on average will now die sooner and any health complication is slightly more likely to be fatal. This is both a side effect of spraying and intentional. Anything to increase the kill rate without raising many alarm bells.

     

  • Climate Modification

    To help or hurt crops, keep skies clear for a major event (like the Olympics), cause a typhoon, etc.

     

  • Nano-fiber Propagation

    To universally install a BioAPI in everyone they need to spray nano-fibers.

     

    These fibers cannot be put into the food supply or given in some other way, the uptake across the population would take forever and not propagate very efficiently.

     

    It's much easily just to spray everyone like an insect; and because it's happening to everyone and universal the herd mentality of the unwashed masses then justifies it.

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_chemtrails32.htm

Never seen so much crap in one post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Big Jim said:

This whole idea has "unintended consequences" written all over it.  There are many smaller undertakings where we have shown that we do not have the foresight to match our abilities.  Just as an example, what happens when, after spending years replicating the effects of a major volcanic eruption, we actually have a major volcanic eruption?

Exactly !

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Imaginarynumber1 said:

Never seen so much crap in one post

If you think truth is crap then that is your prerogative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Truthseeker007 said:

If you think truth is crap then that is your prerogative.

You're delusional if you believe any of that.
You also have a very poor understanding of basic science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Imaginarynumber1 said:

You're delusional if you believe any of that.
You also have a very poor understanding of basic science.

Your delusional if you think the PTB wouldn't do what they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure that fixing a problem started by pumping sh!t into the atmosphere, isn't going to be fixed by pumping more sh!t into the atmosphere. It's like fixing a bullet wound by shooting it with a gun, probably gonna make things worse than they already are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, pbarosso said:

chem trail people and flat earth people both go to the same conventions

Yeah, and their convention is that people with an IQ >75 are not allowed to join the club/s.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/24/2018 at 1:25 PM, Silver_Raven said:

I'm pretty sure that fixing a problem started by pumping sh!t into the atmosphere, isn't going to be fixed by pumping more sh!t into the atmosphere. It's like fixing a bullet wound by shooting it with a gun, probably gonna make things worse than they already are

Probably true, but we've run out of time.  It's too late for a soft landing and if we want a successful landing (one we can walk away from), we may have to resort to some form of terraforming on earth.

Doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dos anyone think we should hold off for a minute trying to lower the temps and just keep reducing our carbon footprint? If you put any stock in this: 

https://www.universetoday.com/139189/are-we-headed-towards-another-deep-solar-minimum/ 

then the solar output may drop for a little while (possibly as low as the maunder) which might buy us a bit of time. If you accelerate cooling during a minimum that might have an unintended effect. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.