Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Psychokinesis – The Forgotten True Story From


macqdor

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Imaginarynumber1 said:

The obvious 2 being you and papageorge

Any proof of that or just your opinion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, papageorge1 said:

Any proof of that or just your opinion?

I could take a random photo, say there is a ghost in it, and you would believe it

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

well that doesn't make any sense.  you're protecting me from myself LMAO!

 

I digress

 

Quote

Kulagina was suspected of utilizing hidden magnets and threads to perform her feats.[3] She was caught cheating on more than one occasion, according to British authors Joel Levy[4] and Mike Dash[5] and American science writer Martin Gardner.[6] In 1987, Kulagina sued and won a partial victory in a defamation case brought against a Soviet government magazine that had accused her of fraud.[7]

OMG i'd buy Kulagina cup of coffee if she was still around. Skeptics calling someone a fraud.   The word fraud is another word for bias.

skeptics make careers protecting their personal world view. IMHO of  course ;-)

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Imaginarynumber1 said:

I could take a random photo, say there is a ghost in it, and you would believe it

Just make up a ghost story. That works too.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Imaginarynumber1 said:

The obvious 2 being you and papageorge

Excuse me..... I'm gullible too.

I resent being omitted! :w00t:

Edited by acute
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, macqdor said:

 

I think the gullible people would resent you calling them gullible.  can everyone speak for themselves?

why do the skeptics fear information?

 

state your argument. your disbelief and let people make up their own minds.

 

who here is gullible? point them out to me.

for the record you just called someone a name. when u said "gullible."

 

 

 

 

Did you check the references of this article? ResearchGate is not a scientific research resource. 

The second link references this link for it's conclusions now I've randomly opened 15 out of the links provided and none have positive results, as far as their validity I'd need to read more. Please show me a paper in the link with positive results. The vast majority of them have nothing to do with the article nor this topic.

http://deanradin.com/evidence/evidence.htm

Well and the third link is a YouTube video.

Not one iota of tangible evidence to support or suggest this woman had any 'powers'.

Damn you @sci-nerd for making me read this crap.

Edited by danydandan
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, XenoFish said:

Just make up a ghost story. That works too.

Literally say ANYTHING and he'll believe you

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, macqdor said:

Dude, everybody knows ghosts aren't real ;-)~

And neither are psychics. You're learning.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, macqdor said:

well that doesn't make any sense.  you're protecting me from myself LMAO!

 

I digress

 

OMG i'd buy Kulagina cup of coffee if she was still around. Skeptics calling someone a fraud.   The word fraud is another word for bias.

skeptics make careers protecting their personal world view. IMHO of  course ;-)

 

 

 

Yeah a fraud would be someone who faked a haunting, got called out on it, then ran away. Not saying who:whistle:

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, macqdor said:

well that doesn't make any sense.  you're protecting me from myself LMAO!

 

I digress

 

OMG i'd buy Kulagina cup of coffee if she was still around. Skeptics calling someone a fraud.   The word fraud is another word for bias.

skeptics make careers protecting their personal world view. IMHO of  course ;-)

 

 

 

So do believers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, papageorge1 said:

Any proof of that or just your opinion?

I'd say you have a history here on UM to accept any testimony given on the paranormal by total anonymous strangers. I don't recall seeing you ask for additional evidence. If you did do that, I've missed it.

  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, macqdor said:

ghosts aren't real 

Does that mean you're going to stop posting ghost threads? Which all turn into a trash fire. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, XenoFish said:

 Which all turn into a trash fire. 

Well all know that I'm the resident dumpster fire around here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

“The most fatal illusion is the settled point of view. Since life is growth and motion, a fixed point of view kills anybody who has one.” 
 Brooks Atkinson

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, macqdor said:

“The most fatal illusion is the settled point of view. Since life is growth and motion, a fixed point of view kills anybody who has one.” 
 Brooks Atkinson

I'm not settled! Give it to me, baby! The evidence!

give-it-to-me-baby.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@sci-nerd seriously dude one of these papers is on the power of prayer done by MIT and it shows that when people know they are being prayed for that subject group had a higher rate of mortality.  

A few of them are just nuts, like 40 years old. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, danydandan said:

A few of them are just nuts, like 40 years old. 

Shh, the older the "evidence" the better. Like a wine. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, XenoFish said:

Yeah a fraud would be someone who faked a haunting, got called out on it, then ran away. Not saying who:whistle:

Ran away? That’s one way to put it I guess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, danydandan said:

@sci-nerd seriously dude one of these papers is on the power of prayer done by MIT and it shows that when people know they are being prayed for that subject group had a higher rate of mortality.  

A few of them are just nuts, like 40 years old. 

You talking bout that telepathy link? If so, thanks for checkin it out for me! :tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, XenoFish said:

Shh, the older the "evidence" the better. Like a wine. 

You'd not say that about cheese or meat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

“It does take great maturity to understand that the opinion we are arguing for is merely the hypothesis we favor, necessarily imperfect, probably transitory, which only very limited minds can declare to be a certainty or a truth.” 
 Milan Kundera, Encounter

see you on my next posts guys.

I leave this candy cane for you to devour.

 

 

Enjoy

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sci-nerd said:

You talking bout that telepathy link? If so, thanks for checkin it out for me! :tu:

No, the links in the OPs article.

Your one, while interesting, isn't mind to mind. It's mind to computer to internet to computer to mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.