spacebret Posted February 10, 2019 #101 Share Posted February 10, 2019 I am not sure how to convey that this is not a hoax to you. I am not obsessed with balloons. I am just saying that the terrestrial explaination is balloon. There is no other terrestrial explaination that I know of. If you think it is a balloon or a hoax I cannot convince you otherwise because my skills as a photographer are too poor according to you. I am not sure why I am continuing to respond to this, but get this, I am genuine, I understand that I could have captured more frames and explained why I did not, and I also understand the actual difficulty in capturing such an object. I beg anyone who thinks they can do better, to do better, myself included. If people are judging my photography skills based on this video I am confident that those who actually know a thing or two about photography would understand the difficulty in capturing objects like this, and actually might commend me on the fact that I did capture sharp frames at roughly 10 megapixels. Who knows what videographers or editors would think, but there are a couple sharp frames at around 10 megapixels. It is so sharp that the object captured could only be 1.5 feet long at roughly a mile away. Not even sure why I am responding to you, but just to be clear, yes it is a low blow to attack my photography skills based on these images. Go ahead and look at my Instagram at https://www.instagram.com/bretpics and attack me there as well if you are such a critic of photography skills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now