Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

How much does the Milky Way weigh?


Still Waters

Recommended Posts

The Milky Way is even weightier than imagined. Using data from NASA's Hubble Space Telescope and the European Space Agency's Gaia satellite, astronomers have determined the most accurate measurement of its mass: Our vast galaxy clocks in at 1.5 trillion solar masses.

One solar mass is the mass of our sun, which is 2 times 10 to the 30th power kilograms. It's not exactly as if the Milky Way, or even stars and planets, can be put on a scale.

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/03/07/world/milky-way-weight-scn/index.html

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The Milky Way needs to go on a dairy free diet then ?

~

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A ten, ? a twelve pounder? eh! ? a quarter pounder?  yeah that was kinda weak  / GROAN ... no likeys  *crickets*  aaaw BOO !

constellation.jpg?w=630

Edited by MWoo7
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hate to be the party pooper, but "weight" makes no sense in space. There's only mass and gravity.
Weight is relative to mass. A 200 pound iron ball on earth, weighs only 33 pounds on the moon.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sci-nerd said:

Hate to be the party pooper, but "weight" makes no sense in space. There's only mass and gravity.
Weight is relative to mass. A 200 pound iron ball on earth, weighs only 33 pounds on the moon.

...and a  planet weighing over 140 Billion, Trillion tons...weighs exactly....nothing! Because a planet floating in space has no more weight than an apple floating in space.   Mass and Gravity!  :yes:   ...but then again, what do I know...that is all astronomically above my pay-grade!

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, sci-nerd said:

Hate to be the party pooper, but "weight" makes no sense in space. There's only mass and gravity.
Weight is relative to mass. A 200 pound iron ball on earth, weighs only 33 pounds on the moon.

Science related stories are often broken down into laymans terms so the unfettered masses can better understand things that they normal couldn't. 

And more often than not, the actual science is lost in the process. But hey, at least Karen and Susan can talk about how much our galaxy weighs over the water cooler monday morning while joking about how it's not even half of what Janice in accounting weighs.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Imaginarynumber1 said:

Science related stories are often broken down into laymans terms so the unfettered masses can better understand things that they normal couldn't. 

And more often than not, the actual science is lost in the process. But hey, at least Karen and Susan can talk about how much our galaxy weighs over the water cooler monday morning while joking about how it's not even half of what Janice in accounting weighs.

Then they could just say that the Milky Way has the mass equivalent to 495 quadrillion Earth's.

That's 495,000,000,000,000,000.

Then people would still grasp it, but without screwing with facts about space.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sci-nerd said:

Then they could just say that the Milky Way has the mass equivalent to 495 quadrillion Earth's.

That's 495,000,000,000,000,000.

Then people would still grasp it, but without screwing with facts about space.

They'd they'd just say it "weighs as much as...." because a lot of people do not understand the distinction between mass and weight

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, sci-nerd said:

. . . ball on earth, weighs only 33 pounds on the moon.

  GGGGROANER ALERT:  Okay so what is a quarter pounder eh!? 

No necessary instant reply I was just tossing that out there.  TOOOOOODLES!

Edited by MWoo7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MWoo7 said:

Okay so what is a quarter pounder eh!?

A nice lunch?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, sci-nerd said:

A nice lunch?

 Quarterpounder WITH CHEESE ! would be Apx.: 0.6 ounces; BOO! so it would take 16.5
to fill you up what a rip off !

Probably stick with the 3 milky ways.

Edited by MWoo7
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
15 minutes ago, Imaginarynumber1 said:

They'd they'd just say it "weighs as much as...." because a lot of people do not understand the distinction between mass and weight

That's how myths are born. Changing facts to fit common concepts.
What we need to do is make people curious about real facts. Not change them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The chokolate bar? Hmm i would say 42 :-) ok i dont know the answer to this qestion and i wish i could have asked one of my relatives who passed resently about this he was a professor in thoretical physics.

Edited by Impedancer
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it wasn't for Gravity all the stars and planets would fall to the bottom of the universe , and get squashed on top of each other .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.