Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Cern and time line jumping

Desertrat56

By Desertrat56
in Modern Mysteries, New Age and Prophecies

 Share

Recommended Posts

Piney Celestial

Piney

Posted
   #76 
Posted
16 minutes ago, Robotic Jew said:

Are you the protagonist in a cheesy 80's action movie?

No, I hate bikers. Always have, because they sold my mother her dope and gained quite a reputation in prison, cowboying in South Dakota and Nebraska and at powwows beating them into hamburger. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 249
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Desertrat56

    44

  • papageorge1

    42

  • XenoFish

    37

  • Emma_Acid

    15

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Rlyeh
Rlyeh

I've got a better theory; memories are unreliable and people don't like being wrong.

Emma_Acid
Emma_Acid

Neither of the things you posted prove what you're claiming. "Quantum physics says this" *waves hands* "therefore this practically unrelated science fiction concept is not only real but prefe

Scholar4Truth
Scholar4Truth

The Mandela Effect is just proof memory is not always reliable. 

zep73 Perspicacious

zep73

Posted
   #78 
Posted
On 19.5.2019 at 5:32 PM, papageorge1 said:

That statement is like someone saying 'Ghosts are not real'. It is just one opinion stated as a fact. I hold the  Mandela Effect to be  real and this is a subject of considerable interest to me.

Oh georgie, you are as predictable as rain i October. If it's far out, you will defend it!

But you are off your territory with this one. The Mandela effect is based on the many worlds hypothesis - which in itself is a very weak hypothesis. It depends on another weak hypothesis called super determinism.
So you are standing with a double weak hypothesis, but it gets worse! The Mandela effect violates the laws of physics by mixing separated (hypothetical) realities. Realities, that in hypo-theory, are separated by frequencies that cannot be changed spontaneously.

Who's in charge of running all these realities and changing the frequencies (just to confuse us!) ?? God?

Well, if it is God, then he has a new title to his resume, besides homicidal egomaniac, friendly advisor and cosmic santa claus. He's also an IT nerd!
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
papageorge1 Erudite

papageorge1

Posted
   #79 
Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, sci-nerd said:

Oh georgie, you are as predictable as rain i October. 

Oh nerdie, you are as predictable as rain in October.

32 minutes ago, sci-nerd said:

 

But you are off your territory with this one. The Mandela effect is based on the many worlds hypothesis - which in itself is a very weak hypothesis. It depends on another weak hypothesis called super determinism.
So you are standing with a double weak hypothesis, but it gets worse! The Mandela effect violates the laws of physics by mixing separated (hypothetical) realities. Realities, that in hypo-theory, are separated by frequencies that cannot be changed spontaneously.

Who's in charge of running all these realities and changing the frequencies (just to confuse us!) ?? God?

Well, if it is God, then he has a new title to his resume, besides homicidal egomaniac, friendly advisor and cosmic santa claus. He's also an IT nerd!
 

Apparently, it is you outside your territory on this one. The Mandela Effect is about having memories at odds with the current reality. That's it!

The causes are unknown and controversial with multiple theories out there.

I personally lean to the idea that reality is a creation of consciousness.

 

Edited by papageorge1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
zep73 Perspicacious

zep73

Posted
   #80 
Posted
15 minutes ago, papageorge1 said:

The causes are unknown and controversial with multiple theories out there.

None of them are valid without super determinism. And that alone is silly.

16 minutes ago, papageorge1 said:

I personally lean to the idea that reality is a creation of consciousness.

Oh yeah? Whose consciousness made the first 13.7999999999 billion years then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
papageorge1 Erudite

papageorge1

Posted
   #81 
Posted
Just now, sci-nerd said:

None of them are valid without super determinism. And that alone is silly.

You are making too many assumptions. This water has not been charted.

2 minutes ago, sci-nerd said:

Oh yeah? Whose consciousness made the first 13.7999999999 billion years then?

In my beliefs the entire universe from beginning to end is a thought-form of Brahman/God. We are all part of the One.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
zep73 Perspicacious

zep73

Posted
   #82 
Posted
2 minutes ago, papageorge1 said:

You are making too many assumptions. This water has not been charted.

Assumptions based on hundreds of years of knowledge and thousands of years of philosophy.

Did you think that the Mandela effect was a purely new idea? The idea of many similar realities was formulated in 1957 by Hugh Everett. In 2010 Fiona Broome took it one leap further by making those realities mingle among individual persons. A new myth was born. A myth that defies the laws of nature, and is based on a weak hypothesis.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Piney Celestial

Piney

Posted
   #83 
Posted
14 minutes ago, papageorge1 said:

In my beliefs the entire universe from beginning to end is a thought-form of Brahman/God. We are all part of the One.

Brahman is the Living Universe which we are all part of. The Chinese term is "Tian" The Heavens, In Japanese it "Amenominakanushi" "The Heart of the Universe"

It has nothing to do with the Judeo-Christian "God". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
papageorge1 Erudite

papageorge1

Posted
   #84 
Posted
1 minute ago, sci-nerd said:

Assumptions based on hundreds of years of knowledge and thousands of years of philosophy.

Did you think that the Mandela effect was a purely new idea? The idea of many similar realities was formulated in 1957 by Hugh Everett. In 2010 Fiona Broome took it one leap further by making those realities mingle among individual persons. A new myth was born. A myth that defies the laws of nature, and is based on a weak hypothesis.

My opinion is that the Mandela Effect is hard to believe but it's real. Did you read my personal story earlier this thread?

The universe is not what we think it to be. It  might be plastic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
papageorge1 Erudite

papageorge1

Posted
   #85 
Posted
1 minute ago, Piney said:

Brahman is the Living Universe which we are all part of. The Chinese term is "Tian" The Heavens, In Japanese it "Amenominakanushi" "The Heart of the Universe"

It has nothing to do with the Judeo-Christian "God". 

Just trying to bridge terminology gaps with westerners, Piney. Brahman/Tian and that lengthy Japanese word are not going to communicate much to a western science-nerd. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
zep73 Perspicacious

zep73

Posted
   #86 
Posted
1 minute ago, papageorge1 said:

Did you read my personal story earlier this thread?

No, sorry. I came into this thread late.

1 minute ago, papageorge1 said:

The universe is not what we think it to be. It  might be plastic?

Plastic? Honestly?

It behaves like mathematical equations. It is electric, hollow and holographic. Plastic did not hit me based on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Piney Celestial

Piney

Posted
   #87 
Posted
5 minutes ago, papageorge1 said:

that lengthy Japanese word

Normally I have to say it about 4 times when speaking. :yes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
papageorge1 Erudite

papageorge1

Posted
   #88 
Posted
Just now, sci-nerd said:

It behaves like mathematical equations. It is electric, hollow and holographic. Plastic did not hit me based on that.

well with the paranormal and the Mandela Effect there must be some equations operating that we don't know about yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
XenoFish Eternal

XenoFish

Posted
   #89 
Posted
4 minutes ago, papageorge1 said:

well with the paranormal and the Mandela Effect there must be some equations operating that we don't know about yet.

Yeah, we know. It's called having a faulty memory. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
zep73 Perspicacious

zep73

Posted
   #90 
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, papageorge1 said:

well with the paranormal and the Mandela Effect there must be some equations operating that we don't know about yet.

Back in the days I also had some theories that I thought scientists hadn't thought of, so I went on forums and asked.

To my surprise then (not now), it turned out that everything imaginable has been thought of and tested. Multiple times.

The closest I ever came to a new idea was photon/QF energy exchange, where photons can upgrade virtual particles. But my theory was related to the cosmic acceleration, and it wasn't enough to explain it.

Edited by sci-nerd
Link to comment
Share on other sites
evalha Neophyte

evalha

Posted
   #92 
Posted

Millennials: "I don't remember something correctly from when I was four, therefore THE UNIVERSE CHANGED, since the UNIVERSE REVOLVES AROUND ME."

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
zep73 Perspicacious

zep73

Posted
   #93 
Posted
9 minutes ago, XenoFish said:

Can someone explain to me why a memory slip has to be "paranormal"? 

Yes! Ehh.... Sorry it slipped my mind :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
XenoFish Eternal

XenoFish

Posted
   #94 
Posted
15 minutes ago, sci-nerd said:

Yes! Ehh.... Sorry it slipped my mind :huh:

Come on man. You know how this game works. We're the guys who are wrong. We don't have the ethereal woo on our side. Our minds are so infinitely tiny that we can't comprehend the woo. We must therefore give into the woo in order to expand our consciousness. The woo is our salvation. It's all paranormal from here on out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
papageorge1 Erudite

papageorge1

Posted
   #95 
Posted

 

33 minutes ago, sci-nerd said:

 everything imaginable has been thought of and tested. Multiple times.

 

I can't even imagine any real scientist agreeing with that. 

Was your great grandfather the one that wanted to close the patent office in 1892 because everything worthwhile has been invented already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
zep73 Perspicacious

zep73

Posted
   #96 
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, papageorge1 said:

I can't even imagine any real scientist agreeing with that. 

Was your great grandfather the one that wanted to close the patent office in 1892 because everything worthwhile has been invented already.

Not talking about inventions, dummy, but about theories and hypothesis. Everything you can possibly think of has already been thought, tried and (mostly) dismissed.

Edited by sci-nerd
Link to comment
Share on other sites
papageorge1 Erudite

papageorge1

Posted
   #97 
Posted
10 minutes ago, sci-nerd said:

Not talking about inventions, dummy,

You must not understand analogies, dummy,

Link to comment
Share on other sites
zep73 Perspicacious

zep73

Posted
   #98 
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, papageorge1 said:

You must not understand analogies, dummy,

Fair enough.

Our talk actually gave me an idea for a new conjecture about cosmic acceleration. It will probably not hold, but I absolutely love getting those ideas. So thanks for putting me on that track :tu:

Edited by sci-nerd
Link to comment
Share on other sites
stereologist Immortal

stereologist

Posted
   #99 
Posted
15 hours ago, papageorge1 said:

My opinion is that the Mandela Effect is hard to believe but it's real. Did you read my personal story earlier this thread?

The universe is not what we think it to be. It  might be plastic?

So why don't we see any evidence of this. All there are to support this are stories and those stories are  never backed up with facts.

About all we have are stories which strongly match bad memories. The more we learn about how human brains work the more we see that memories are fallible. This is just a case of evolution forming a brain that does what needs to be done. It works well enough and that is all that matters.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
stereologist Immortal

stereologist

Posted
   #100 
Posted
15 hours ago, XenoFish said:

Can someone explain to me why a memory slip has to be "paranormal"? 

Because everything is paranormal.

I have a rubber stamp that says paranormal on it. If you were within arms reach you too would have paranormal on your forehead in red letters. I smack anyone caught trying to wash it off.

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.