Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

NASA's 9-year Moon landing plan has leaked


UM-Bot

Recommended Posts

 

Interesting but hardly anything written in stone unfortunately. Next presidential election could change (and often has) everything.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does that mean they have lost their ability to keep secrets now? Is someone getting fired over this "leaking"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, esoteric_toad said:

Interesting but hardly anything written in stone unfortunately. Next presidential election could change (and often has) everything.

True. NASA's budget is tight and seems to widely fluctuate as per Presidential administration and, of course, Congressional funding approvals.

This issue may get a little more attention and approval since it appears that other countries have the same end-goals with regards to our Moon.

Who knows, this might be perceived by serious experts as a form of national security interest.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Rolci said:

Does that mean they have lost their ability to keep secrets now? Is someone getting fired over this "leaking"?

Well, as a "proposed general long-term initiative" I don't think it was classified as, say "Top Secret"

If and when it starts moving along though, its developing details might be at least "Confidential"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

THIS IS COUNTER INTELLIGENCE. ITS MEANT TO CAUSE CHINA TO SPEND ALL ITS MONEY ONITS LUNAR PROGRAM, WE KNOW HUMANS CANT BE SUSTAINED ON THE MOON DUE TO THE MICRO ABRASIVE NATURE OF THE DUST. WE DONT REALLY PLAN TO GO BACK....THAT OR MY LOCKHEED CONTACT IS A LIAR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, pbarosso said:

WE KNOW HUMANS CANT BE SUSTAINED ON THE MOON DUE TO THE MICRO ABRASIVE NATURE OF THE DUST

:o

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's an idea. Instead of competing with other nations (ie: China) why don't we all cooperate with space exploration. A lot more would get done then...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot more would get done and it would be cheaper for everyone if we could all get together  BUT with politics being what they are it won't happen.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, pbarosso said:

THIS IS COUNTER INTELLIGENCE. ITS MEANT TO CAUSE CHINA TO SPEND ALL ITS MONEY ONITS LUNAR PROGRAM, WE KNOW HUMANS CANT BE SUSTAINED ON THE MOON DUE TO THE MICRO ABRASIVE NATURE OF THE DUST. WE DONT REALLY PLAN TO GO BACK....THAT OR MY LOCKHEED CONTACT IS A LIAR.

:huh:. I think I speak for more than myself when I say:

What?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 22.5.2019 at 12:59 AM, pbarosso said:

THIS IS COUNTER INTELLIGENCE. ITS MEANT TO CAUSE CHINA TO SPEND ALL ITS MONEY ONITS LUNAR PROGRAM, WE KNOW HUMANS CANT BE SUSTAINED ON THE MOON DUE TO THE MICRO ABRASIVE NATURE OF THE DUST. WE DONT REALLY PLAN TO GO BACK....THAT OR MY LOCKHEED CONTACT IS A LIAR.

OKAY.

IT IS WIDELY KNOWN THAT PEOPLE WHO WRITE IN ALL CAPS ARE ALLWAYS RIGHT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
On 5/21/2019 at 11:21 PM, Unfortunately said:

:huh:. I think I speak for more than myself when I say:

What?

i think its pretty clear, or maybe you dont think throwing some bait out for our enemies is a good idea?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, pbarosso said:

i think its pretty clear, or maybe you dont think throwing some bait out for our enemies is a good idea?

I can see where you're coming from and it's entirely a possibility but, regardless of whether baiting an enemy is a good idea or not, stating that this is definitively counter intelligence without any supportive evidence seems premature and just insights dissension. Not everything is a conspiracy. ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Unfortunately said:

I can see where you're coming from and it's entirely a possibility but, regardless of whether baiting an enemy is a good idea or not, stating that this is definitively counter intelligence without any supportive evidence seems premature and just insights dissension. Not everything is a conspiracy^_^

Hey thats my line. <_<

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Noteverythingisaconspiracy said:

Hey thats my line. <_<

Oops, sorry. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.