Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
and then

U.S. states protect dangerous illegals

13 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

 
papageorge1

I don't understand why anyone should support 'illegal' anything.

 

  • Thanks 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
freetoroam
Quote

In all the cases the illegal immigrants were released into various communities

Local governments that offer illegal immigrants sanctuary have long defied federal orders by releasing criminal aliens

https://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2019/05/feds-use-dui-arrest-records-to-catch-illegal-aliens-released-by-sanctuary-cities/

There is no reason not to hand them over, other than pure laziness because they can't be bothered with the paperwork or they are getting backhanders off the criminals or a friend or family member who are  legal.

If the police are breaking the laws by not following orders, surely they should be investigated and arrested? 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RavenHawk

They can further cut out more paperwork by not fingering printing when they book people that are arrested.  Even better, just don't arrest anyone.  Let the lawlessness takeover the community, like during the riots under Obama.  But sooner or later, someone that the ruling elite cares about will be the victim of an illegal.  Then things will change.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Earl.Of.Trumps

@RavenHawk  You better believe that heavy crime districts are NOT where the people who makes these policy decisions live.  Ever see Pelosi's WALLED mansion? WHat a complete phony

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RavenHawk
52 minutes ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said:

@RavenHawk  You better believe that heavy crime districts are NOT where the people who makes these policy decisions live.  Ever see Pelosi's WALLED mansion? WHat a complete phony

That is very true.  She can’t cloister everyone close to her within her walls.  She has grandchildren that go to school and as these heavy crime districts expand, they are going to overrun areas where her grandchildren live and go to school.  All it’ll take is an attack on one.  I believe that Pelosi does not have much longer to remain in power anyway, but this will apply to whoever the heir apparent will be.  I do believe that there will be particular events that will occur in the next year and a half that will establish the demeanor of the voter.  Just as the Riots were Obama’s crowning achievement, increasing crime from illegals will be the Progs’.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
and then
 
 
1
6 hours ago, freetoroam said:

There is no reason not to hand them over, other than pure laziness because they can't be bothered with the paperwork or they are getting backhanders off the criminals or a friend or family member who are  legal.

If the police are breaking the laws by not following orders, surely they should be investigated and arrested? 

It would be a logical assumption yet several states today just ignore Federal law when it goes against their political desires.  When the Federal government is essentially in Democrat hands again and they attempt to use it as a club to force obedience to their social and fiscal policies they are going to finally understand the monster THEY created, isn't so easily put back in a box.  New, severe second amendment regulations? Sanctuary states!  Radical new social policies to be enforced?  SANCTUARY for 1st Amendment!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
South Alabam

Then start using the constitution against them. When they are releasing and protecting illegal aliens ALL of whom we have no idea of the criminal background of, then turn a blind eye in many instances and shield them from prosecution etc.. that is not protecting or defending the constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. Some of these illegals become the enemy and those who protect them.   PERIOD.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RoofGardener
6 hours ago, freetoroam said:

There is no reason not to hand them over, other than pure laziness because they can't be bothered with the paperwork or they are getting backhanders off the criminals or a friend or family member who are  legal.

If the police are breaking the laws by not following orders, surely they should be investigated and arrested? 

Funny you should mention that. According to the original linked article, a Judge and a court official HAVE been arrested and charged with conspiracy, obstruction, and aiding-and-abetting when they assisted a criminal to leave the court grounds. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RavenHawk
36 minutes ago, and then said:

It would be a logical assumption yet several states today just ignore Federal law when it goes against their political desires.  When the Federal government is essentially in Democrat hands again and they attempt to use it as a club to force obedience to their social and fiscal policies they are going to finally understand the monster THEY created, isn't so easily put back in a box.  New, severe second amendment regulations? Sanctuary states!  Radical new social policies to be enforced?  SANCTUARY for the 1st Amendment!

Note to programmers:  There is something seriously wrong with @and then’s post (no not the content).  “Quote” and “Top” do not work and selecting text is weird.  Must be a vast Left-wing conspiracy! ;)  Further info:  It's ok if @freetoroam's quote is hidden.

 

We already have Sanctuary Cities and Counties for the 2nd Amendment.  It’s hard to believe that we’ll need one for the 1st.  Of course, the 1st is intolerant and racist to Progs.  We need to get rid of one and keep the other.  Which one should it be?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aztek
18 minutes ago, RavenHawk said:

 

 

We already have Sanctuary Cities and Counties for the 2nd Amendment.  It’s hard to believe that we’ll need one for the 1st.  Of course, the 1st is intolerant and racist to Progs.  We need to get rid of one and keep the other.  Which one should it be?

 

2nd amendment sanctuaries protect constitutional right of citizens, sanctuary cities that protect illegals are aiding and abetting criminals,  the choice is obvious

  • Thanks 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Big Jim

Balkanization is well under way.  We have sanctuaries where laws are ignored and others where rights are protected.  Rights that were originally meant for all citizens are now being reduced to local enclaves.  In certain districts the invaders of our country have more rights than citizens.  There are no sanctuaries for them.  No place where crimes and infractions are forgiven.  Never before have the spoils of war been so willingly turned over.  Historically, invaders have had to fight for and steal what they wanted.  Now we give it to them and even more than we give the needy among us.  How long can such a country exist?  After 2 centuries of American pride we are now being encouraged to be ashamed of our country.  Don't fly the flag, don't stand for the pledge.  Those who want to preserve our way of life are called racists and phobes, as if all that our forefathers have fought and died for can be reduced to fear of a color.  We keep being told that we only resist the invaders because they're brown and we're expected to be remorseful and embarrassed by that.  We finally have a leader that recognizes the problem and he is being stymied and impeded in everything he tries to do.  If he fails, we fail.  All cities will be like San Francisco.  The invaders that we've fattened and placated will become like bears in the park when the food runs out.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Servator

I agree (As if it means anything) to just about 99% of what is said, it is odd that the areas which support Sanctuary for Illegals are those areas which are particularly Liberal and NON- Traditional in Values and Morals. Perhaps living/Raised within a warped society is a factor on their decision. 

 

LINK for State and City and Counties for Sanctuary:  https://cis.org/Map-Sanctuary-Cities-Counties-and-States

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.