Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Russia: 300,000 Year Old "Nano-Technology"


TrumanB

Recommended Posts

 

What do you think of this? Nano artefacts from ancient times...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, that's a legitimate opinion. But...there is always a doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TrumanB said:

well, that's a legitimate opinion. But...there is always a doubt.

It's a proven hoax. Do some deeper seaching...........

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did and didn't find anything. Maybe I should look for Russian sources lol.

Anyhow, it does sound hardly believable.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So how many woo claims can be crammed into one 3 minute video?

"Snow Yeti's", "Dyatlov Pass", and a reference to Incan objets d' arte?

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Piney said:

It's a proven hoax. Do some deeper seaching...........

Just for clarity, is there a link to the debunking?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jodie.Lynne said:

Just for clarity, is there a link to the debunking?

Looking for it. It's been a few years. This is old woocrap.

@stereologist  Might still have the link stashed somewhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am curious to know if copper and tungsten can naturally form tiny curls under certain circumstances. Some minerals and compounds do weird things in heat or cold or whatever.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Not A Rockstar said:

I am curious to know if copper and tungsten can naturally form tiny curls under certain circumstances. Some minerals and compounds do weird things in heat or cold or whatever.

Gold can because how deep it is before being pushed up. I've only seen natural copper in nuggets though. 

5 minutes ago, stereologist said:

The first question for everyone should be, "How did anyone arrive at the dates?"

You can't date a piece of copper, or a piece of tungsten, or molybdenum.

I kinda figured that. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poking around online we see that the dates are 10K, 15K, 20K, 30K, 300K years old. With errors like that I don't think yesterday is that bad a guess either.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is another piece of the puzzle

http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/review-of-ancient-aliens-s11e12-russias-secret-files

Quote

Following this the show alleges that “tiny metal coils and springs” were found in the Ural Mountains in 1992. The objects, popular on fringe websites, allegedly date back 20,000 years. I am not familiar with the objects, and Russian UFO researchers have offered outlandish explanations about exploding UFOs and ancient nanotechnology. Russian skeptics have alleged that the objects are fakes, or misidentified. As far as I know, no one outside of Russia has ever studied one.

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, stereologist said:

It seems that the original claim had people at one school and now it is another. Hoaxes tend to change over time to refresh them and keep them going.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tungsten_filament_in_halogen_lamp.JPG

BUS_Elx_MDL_1_220.jpg

These are typical products that use these types of structures.

I posted that above because it was the first thing I thought of. 

Big tractor lamp. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, stereologist said:

Hoaxes tend to change over time to refresh them and keep them going.

Hoaxes also tend to keep old conversations fresh. Not to mention the facts we extract from them, which keeps some busy with going over short fuses with Russia.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pettytalk said:

Hoaxes also tend to keep old conversations fresh.   

Ah, the opposite of you, I see. 

—Jaylemurph 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there was anything solid behind this claim it would be known in so many years. Unfortunately there is nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jaylemurph said:

Ah, the opposite of you, I see. 

—Jaylemurph 

Yes, but I'm fresh out of school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, stereologist said:

The first question for everyone should be, "How did anyone arrive at the dates?"

 

Believe it or not, that was my thinking too!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.