Stiff Posted June 24, 2019 #151 Share Posted June 24, 2019 5 minutes ago, papageorge1 said: ever-growing mountain of evidence suggesting otherwise. Yet no proof. 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted June 24, 2019 #152 Share Posted June 24, 2019 On 6/22/2019 at 1:08 PM, papageorge1 said: So the scientists in the video can not determine some cobbled together hoax is cobbled together you are saying? Or are they all hoaxers? They are not scientists. 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted June 24, 2019 #153 Share Posted June 24, 2019 On 6/23/2019 at 1:50 AM, papageorge1 said: I also consider how a certain materialist group coalesce on anything suggesting the paranormal/alien/crypto. The purpose of the video was only to give an overview of their scientists' observations. LOL...LOL...If you can show me were Gaia referred to themselves as 'pseudoscience' I will be impressed. By the way, Wikipedia is just a user-edited source that has been edited by Guerilla Skepticism on Wikipedia. I consider them a bit of a biased source. So you find it offensive that there is a group demanding that statements be justified with extensive data? Of course you would. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted June 24, 2019 #154 Share Posted June 24, 2019 On 6/23/2019 at 1:31 PM, papageorge1 said: Yet another attack I seriously doubt. Have you watched the OP video. The attack in this case is by Gaia by promoting another obvious hoax to make money from the ultra-gullible. There is a concerted attack by these people to generate revenue by making people stupid, by promoting fakes, and lies. That is the attack. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted June 24, 2019 #155 Share Posted June 24, 2019 42 minutes ago, papageorge1 said: Except he sees a different silliness than the poster. He sees the silliness of a no-holds-barred clinging to worldviews contradicted by an ever-growing mountain of evidence suggesting otherwise. You consider Edgar Cayce fact accurate...... 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farmer77 Posted June 24, 2019 #156 Share Posted June 24, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Piney said: You consider Edgar Cayce fact accurate...... Oops i um have no idea how or why I quoted you amigo Edited June 24, 2019 by Farmer77 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted June 24, 2019 #157 Share Posted June 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Farmer77 said: Your point? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farmer77 Posted June 24, 2019 #158 Share Posted June 24, 2019 Just now, Piney said: Your point? Im pointless, you should know that by now! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted June 24, 2019 #159 Share Posted June 24, 2019 3 minutes ago, Farmer77 said: Oops i um have no idea how or why I quoted you amigo 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stiff Posted June 24, 2019 #160 Share Posted June 24, 2019 5 minutes ago, Farmer77 said: Oops i um have no idea how or why I quoted you amigo Mind control from alien mummies. The force is too strong to withstand. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted June 24, 2019 #161 Share Posted June 24, 2019 5 minutes ago, Stiff said: Mind control from alien mummies. The force is too strong to withstand. Hey, you can use that as a excuse with your spouse. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stiff Posted June 24, 2019 #162 Share Posted June 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Piney said: Hey, you can use that as a excuse with your spouse. I'd try but the spouse has an even stronger force to withstand. It's all in 'The Stare'. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stiff Posted June 24, 2019 #163 Share Posted June 24, 2019 Even Batman knows... 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted June 24, 2019 #164 Share Posted June 24, 2019 2 hours ago, papageorge1 said: More and more I am seeing why I have less and less belief in the integrity of the so-called skeptics who in my eyes often become just a knee-jerk gang of anti-paranormal/crypto/alien types. They come up with their best attack angle and insist they’re just telling the indisputable facts. Truly objective thinkers interested in these subjects long enough see through their thin insecure veneer and false bravado. I listen to everything and form my own judgment on the likelihood of what is really the case. Thanks for posting this inane comment. The simple fact is that this is a hoax. It has been proven to be a hoax. The scientists are not scientists. The one person pointed out by secret santa as a real radiologist was probably edited in a manner which did not show what they stated. The same has been done by other frauds and hoaxers. This is a hoax no matter how much you plead. You took the video at face value and unlike real skeptics never bothered to fact check anything. You could have but you are too lazy and are not a skeptic. You listen and accept without question any of this ultra stupidity. It is simple to see through this given even a 6th grade education. The x-rays clearly show metatarsals from multiple individuals rearranged in this gaff. Please put on your big boy pants and go out and learn something for a change. This is the perfect case for you to learn something since it is so simple to see that this is a hoax perpetrated by grave desecraters. 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted June 24, 2019 #165 Share Posted June 24, 2019 2 hours ago, papageorge1 said: It would if I believed that was actually what happened. You don't want to believe because you are a scoffer. You choose not to examine the evidence. You need to cinch up those big boy pants and take the time to look into those people you have so falsely called scientists. Then you can examine the x-rays and see that this is a gaff composed of human remains from multiple people. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted June 24, 2019 Author #166 Share Posted June 24, 2019 (edited) 53 minutes ago, Piney said: You consider Edgar Cayce fact accurate...... Never said more than ‘consider what he says’. The rest of the above is a piney going over-emotional again. Edited June 24, 2019 by papageorge1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted June 24, 2019 #167 Share Posted June 24, 2019 2 hours ago, papageorge1 said: All blinkers are off. My opinion is that I am hearing from types that insist on a version of facts that they like but can’t really know is true. Their blinkers are on towards the stuff in the OP video is my position. You are simply taking the words of the video at face value without checking whether the facts of the case match up with the video. That's what a close minded person does. Get out of that silly box you have crawled into and start fact checking and see how easy it is to learn that you have been fooled once again - probably the millionth time. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted June 24, 2019 #168 Share Posted June 24, 2019 1 hour ago, papageorge1 said: The above is something pg agrees with. Except he sees a different silliness than the poster. He sees the silliness of a no-holds-barred clinging to worldviews contradicted by an ever-growing mountain of evidence suggesting otherwise. Onwards the foot soldiers go to even the next thread topic. There is no mountain of evidence. That's a bald faced lie. Go to the closet and get those big boy pants on and learn from this case which is so easy to figure out as a gaff. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenoFish Posted June 24, 2019 #169 Share Posted June 24, 2019 I went into the wrong business. I should've wrote books on this stuff. Could've made a fortune. 1 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted June 24, 2019 #170 Share Posted June 24, 2019 26 minutes ago, papageorge1 said: Never said more than ‘consider what he says’. The rest of the above is a piney going over-emotional again. What's there to consider. It's false. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted June 24, 2019 #171 Share Posted June 24, 2019 5 minutes ago, XenoFish said: I went into the wrong business. I should've wrote books on this stuff. Could've made a fortune. I'm seriously thinking "**** THOSE IDIOTIC INDIANS!" and writing a book on my style of Shamanism. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenoFish Posted June 24, 2019 #172 Share Posted June 24, 2019 Just now, Piney said: I'm seriously thinking "**** THOSE IDIOTIC INDIANS!" and writing a book on my style of Shamanism. Go for it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted June 24, 2019 Author #173 Share Posted June 24, 2019 41 minutes ago, stereologist said: You are simply taking the words of the video at face value without checking whether the facts of the case match up with the video. As the 'You' in that sentence I can safely say I don't just take the video at face value. A rationalist like myself only 'considers' all things and based on all he knows forms his judgment on likelihood as to what is going on!! He considers statements like 'dastardly hoax proven false' but will not accept the claim at face value either. That is how serious open-minded skeptics like myself operate!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenoFish Posted June 24, 2019 #174 Share Posted June 24, 2019 Since this is a fake/fraud/bunk what's the point in further discussing it? 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted June 25, 2019 #175 Share Posted June 25, 2019 3 hours ago, papageorge1 said: As the 'You' in that sentence I can safely say I don't just take the video at face value. A rationalist like myself only 'considers' all things and based on all he knows forms his judgment on likelihood as to what is going on!! He considers statements like 'dastardly hoax proven false' but will not accept the claim at face value either. That is how serious open-minded skeptics like myself operate!! Your irrational response was did you look at the video. You called those fakes scientists a number of times. You did not consider all things and make a judgement. Had you actually done that then you would have quickly realized this was a hoax. You are anything but a skeptic. A skeptic such as myself analyzes and fact checks. You never do. You blindly accept. You blindly accepted this video and fell for an ultra-stupid hoax. It took only a short while to find out that this was a hoax when it was the rage 2 years ago. 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now