Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Evidence of the Babylonian conquest found


Still Waters

Recommended Posts

Let's keep things civil please - there's way too many derogatory personal remarks being thrown around in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/29/2019 at 9:48 AM, cormac mac airt said:

They did have Gehenna though which is where a lot of the descriptions of Hell seem to originate. 

cormac

Gehenna

The Greek name for the Valley of Hinnom, southwest of ancient Jerusalem. It was prophetically spoken of as a place where dead bodies would be strewn. There is no evidence that animals or humans were thrown into Gehenna to be burned alive or tormented. So the place could not symbolize an invisible region where human souls are tormented eternally in literal fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, larryp said:

Gehenna

The Greek name for the Valley of Hinnom, southwest of ancient Jerusalem. It was prophetically spoken of as a place where dead bodies would be strewn. There is no evidence that animals or humans were thrown into Gehenna to be burned alive or tormented. So the place could not symbolize an invisible region where human souls are tormented eternally in literal fire.

Try again.

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/6558-gehenna

cormac

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, larryp said:

Anyone with eyes can readily see that you are all about Smoke and Mirrors. Yahweh once said of his ancient people; they are worse than an unreasoning animal. I see a similarity.

Here you admit to all the lies Cormac listed.

Harte

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, larryp said:

The first sentence had some truth but then started to fantasize. It's true, Judean Kings Ahaz and Manasseh engaged in idolatrous worship in the Valley of Hinnom, which included the making of human sacrifices by fire to Baal.

Which counters the lie you supported per the quote in Post #703. 

cormac

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^ Yahweh repeatedly warned the Jews, don't do as your neighbors. Yes, some bad Kings disrespect Him. 
Did you think that every King would obey?

Edited by larryp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, larryp said:

^^^ Yahweh repeatedly warned the Jews, don't do as your neighbors. Yes, some bad Kings disrespect Him. 
Did you think that every King would obey?

Is it possible you could ever, consistently, tell the truth? So far your credibility is ZERO. 
 

cormac

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gee I  learned  by doing  a DNA test I`m 10% Jewish,  so in trying to find their past ,I believe the  Moses Hebrews are the Habirus

Habiru (sometimes written as Hapiru, and more accurately as ʿApiru, meaning "dusty, dirty"[1]) is a term used in 2nd-millennium BCE texts throughout the Fertile Crescent for people variously described as rebels, outlaws, raiders, mercenaries, bowmen, servants, slaves, and laborers.[

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habiru

Israel is laid waste and his seed is not;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merneptah_Stele

Babylonian is true because the Hebrews were capture twice by them. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, docyabut2 said:

gee I  learned  by doing  a DNA test I`m 10% Jewish,  so in trying to find their past ,I believe the  Moses Hebrews are the Habirus

Habiru (sometimes written as Hapiru, and more accurately as ʿApiru, meaning "dusty, dirty"[1]) is a term used in 2nd-millennium BCE texts throughout the Fertile Crescent for people variously described as rebels, outlaws, raiders, mercenaries, bowmen, servants, slaves, and laborers.[

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habiru

Israel is laid waste and his seed is not;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merneptah_Stele

Babylonian is true because the Hebrews were capture twice by them. 

 

It’s no small feat to capture an ethnic group 1,000 years before there’s any historical record of them. 

—Jaylemurph 

Edited by jaylemurph
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, docyabut2 said:

Was not a ethnic group but a social status. 

Quote

The biblical word "Hebrew", like Habiru, denotes a social category, not an ethnic group.[14] Since the discovery of the 2nd millennium BCE inscriptions mentioning the Habiru, there have been many theories linking these to the Hebrews of the Bible, but modern scholars see the 'Apiru/Habiru as only one element in an early Israel composed of many different peoples, including nomadic Shasu and Shutu, the biblical Midianites, Kenites, and Amalekites, displaced peasants and pastoralists.[15][16]

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jaylemurph said:

It’s no small feat to capture a ethnic group 1,000 years before there’s any historical record of them. 

 

Fixed that for you......You should know better. :yes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, docyabut2 said:

gee I  learned  by doing  a DNA test I`m 10% Jewish,  so in trying to find their past ,I believe the  Moses Hebrews are the Habirus

Habiru (sometimes written as Hapiru, and more accurately as ʿApiru, meaning "dusty, dirty"[1]) is a term used in 2nd-millennium BCE texts throughout the Fertile Crescent for people variously described as rebels, outlaws, raiders, mercenaries, bowmen, servants, slaves, and laborers.[

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habiru

Israel is laid waste and his seed is not;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merneptah_Stele

Babylonian is true because the Hebrews were capture twice by them. 

 

Except that no reputable archaeologist or historian agrees with you about the Habiru connection. 
 

cormac

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Piney said:

Fixed that for you......You should know better. :yes:

Point taken. Post corrected. 

—Jaylemurph

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, docyabut2 said:

I still believe Akhenaten was the royal  Moses and his real parents were Habirus

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akhenaten

His parents are known and were NEITHER Habiru’s NOR Hebrews. 
 

cormac

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, docyabut2 said:

There were 300 gods that Egypt believed  in ,where the Egyptian  Akhenaten only believe in a one god.

The Aten was the sun god and had been a solar deity in Ancient Egypt LONG before Akhenaten was born. 
 

cormac

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, cormac mac airt said:

His parents are known and were NEITHER Habiru’s NOR Hebrews. 
 

cormac

cormac if you study the  Akhenaten`s  family never pictured him in the paintings of his family :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.