UM-Bot Posted September 18, 2019 #1 Share Posted September 18, 2019 Chad Lawson had been doing a soundcheck at the Paramount Theater in Austin when the picture was taken. https://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/news/330563/pianist-photographs-ghostly-woman-in-theater 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moonman Posted September 18, 2019 #2 Share Posted September 18, 2019 (edited) Looks like a physical person to me. He says he took three quick shots in a row and it's only in one, yet he doesn't post the other two. I want to see the other two. And I don't believe for a second that he's in the position to know for certain that he is the only person in that whole place - not that he claims that from what I saw. Edited September 18, 2019 by moonman 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saru Posted September 18, 2019 #3 Share Posted September 18, 2019 3 minutes ago, moonman said: He says he took three quick shots in a row and it's only in one, yet he doesn't post the other two. I want to see the other two. Here you go: 2 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moonman Posted September 18, 2019 #4 Share Posted September 18, 2019 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Saru said: Here you go: Fair enough - but no timestamps makes it impossible to tell how far apart they were taken. Someone could have popped in and quickly moved on. It looks like she shows up in pic 3 too, further out of the doorway. It's a blurry shot so hard to tell. Maybe a cleaning lady quickly on the move. Looks like there's a possibly a sound guy in the back by the control boards who looks a bit "ghostly" as well. I do not trust "ghost" photos taken in environments like this - too many unknowns and unknown people moving around. Edited September 18, 2019 by moonman 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
esoteric_toad Posted September 18, 2019 #5 Share Posted September 18, 2019 Also why not post the full resolution pics or at least indicate how cropped the images are? Looks like a person and a slow shutter speed to me. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted September 18, 2019 #6 Share Posted September 18, 2019 Papameter 80% Paranormal 20% Hoax or Nornal 3 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThereWeAreThen Posted September 18, 2019 #7 Share Posted September 18, 2019 It's a living person....next. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post acute Posted September 18, 2019 Popular Post #8 Share Posted September 18, 2019 There's no pleasing the skeptics! It's either "not clear enough to make out" or "too clear to be a ghost". 5 1 8 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenoFish Posted September 18, 2019 #9 Share Posted September 18, 2019 10 minutes ago, papageorge1 said: Papameter 80% Paranormal 20% Hoax or Nornal Will you stop with this absurd meter. 2 2 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenoFish Posted September 18, 2019 #10 Share Posted September 18, 2019 Looks like a person and without a time stamp we don't know the exact succession those pictures were made. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted September 18, 2019 #11 Share Posted September 18, 2019 8 minutes ago, XenoFish said: Will you stop with this absurd meter. No I won't stop as I believe the most intelligent way to analyze a situation that can't be reproduced is to consider all the theories as to what may have happened and then judge likelihood. And you and anyone else are free to put me on ignore at any time if it bothers you for some psychological reason. 4 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moonman Posted September 18, 2019 #12 Share Posted September 18, 2019 17 minutes ago, acute said: There's no pleasing the skeptics! It's either "not clear enough to make out" or "too clear to be a ghost". Except nobody said any of that. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moonman Posted September 18, 2019 #13 Share Posted September 18, 2019 (edited) 17 minutes ago, XenoFish said: Will you stop with this absurd meter. I say this with the utmost respect - but for the love of god please stop quoting him so I can stop reading his idiocy - I have him ignored but people quote him so much I'm subjected to most of his dreck anyway. Edited September 18, 2019 by moonman 1 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spartan max2 Posted September 18, 2019 #14 Share Posted September 18, 2019 20 minutes ago, acute said: There's no pleasing the skeptics! It's either "not clear enough to make out" or "too clear to be a ghost". Can't disagree. Unless I see something myself or unless the picture was took by someone I know really well I just can't believe it's not faked (when it's a clear person) or a light error ( when it's too blurry) 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acute Posted September 18, 2019 #15 Share Posted September 18, 2019 14 minutes ago, XenoFish said: Will you stop with this absurd meter. I love the Papameter! You're just jealous because your Xenometer doesn't work properly. Even when you tap the glass, or give it a kick, the needle stays on 0%. 2 3 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XenoFish Posted September 18, 2019 #16 Share Posted September 18, 2019 8 minutes ago, moonman said: I say this with the utmost respect - but for the love of god please stop quoting him so I can stop reading his idiocy - I have him ignored but people quote him so much I'm subjected to most of his dreck anyway. Can do. 3 minutes ago, acute said: I love the Papameter! You're just jealous because your Xenometer doesn't work properly. Even when you tap the glass, or give it a kick, the needle stays on 0%. I'm tempted to add you to the bliss list as well. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted September 18, 2019 #17 Share Posted September 18, 2019 24 minutes ago, acute said: There's no pleasing the skeptics! It's either "not clear enough to make out" or "too clear to be a ghost". The hard-core skeptics are in a never-say-die ego-driven position now. A paradigm shift happens, zero, once or twice maybe in a lifetime. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted September 18, 2019 #18 Share Posted September 18, 2019 8 minutes ago, spartan max2 said: Unless I see something myself or unless the picture was took by someone I know really well I just can't believe it's not faked (when it's a clear person) or a light error ( when it's too blurry) At some point with me logic and knowledge of human nature tells me some people may be hoaxers but the majority are trying to be real with us. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon the frog Posted September 18, 2019 #19 Share Posted September 18, 2019 1 hour ago, Saru said: Here you go: She's making a shade on the wall to her right, a ghost can do that ? So she's a physical person to me. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted September 18, 2019 #20 Share Posted September 18, 2019 3 minutes ago, Jon the frog said: She's making a shade on the wall to her right, a ghost can do that ? It just looks like a dark circle orb to me and not a shadow. It's just a circle shape. 4 minutes ago, Jon the frog said: So she's a physical person to me. Even if it was a shadow I don't see why well-materialized ghosts wouldn't create some shadow effect. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bed of chaos Posted September 18, 2019 #21 Share Posted September 18, 2019 (edited) Now he's gonna **** up Nocturne in A Minor worrying about ghost! If can prove photos taken in rapid succession worth doing. Last pic looks cool..floating away. Anyway could be publicity stunt for show. I'd def check out him out (if lived in area). Edited September 18, 2019 by Bed of chaos 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stiff Posted September 18, 2019 #22 Share Posted September 18, 2019 1 hour ago, papageorge1 said: It just looks like a dark circle orb to me and not a shadow. It's just a circle shape. Yeah. And the paw is pointing the wrong way round too. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted September 18, 2019 #23 Share Posted September 18, 2019 9 minutes ago, Stiff said: Yeah. And the paw is pointing the wrong way round too. Correct observations are not welcome if they suggest anything in favor of a paranormal explanation around here. Geez! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stiff Posted September 18, 2019 #24 Share Posted September 18, 2019 1 minute ago, papageorge1 said: Correct observations are not relevant if they suggest anything in favor of a paranormal explanation around here. Geez! Corrected that for you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hankenhunter Posted September 18, 2019 #25 Share Posted September 18, 2019 4 hours ago, moonman said: Except nobody said any of that. No they didn't. They just want time stamps. Doesn't matter. If the time stamps were produced, the pics would still be shot down. There will never be enough proof for U.M's more ardent skeptics. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now