ExpandMyMind Posted September 26, 2019 #201 Share Posted September 26, 2019 12 minutes ago, OverSword said: Just like Fox News eh? Great. That clears that up. Well, Fox can have high factual reporting, but it has a history of outright fabrications. This is referring only to the news reporting section of the channel. The opinion area is the stuff of nightmares. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoofGardener Posted September 26, 2019 #202 Share Posted September 26, 2019 Just now, Imaginarynumber1 said: He did indeed say that. I was wrong. However, still nothing to do with is son Hmm.. that is entirely possible @Imaginarynumber1. However, it is also possible that it WAS to do with his son, or that his son may have been a factor in his decision making. That's the awkward thing about having potential conflicts of interest. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoofGardener Posted September 26, 2019 #203 Share Posted September 26, 2019 2 minutes ago, ExpandMyMind said: Well, Fox can have high factual reporting, but it has a history of outright fabrications. This is referring only to the news reporting section of the channel. The opinion area is the stuff of nightmares. I quite enjoy the Tucker Carlson programs. Or at least... I DID.. until Youtube started censoring them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unusual Tournament Posted September 26, 2019 #204 Share Posted September 26, 2019 54 minutes ago, and then said: Did I mention... SEVENTEEN SENATORS? Okay link something to this 17 senators. Probably a crapshoot but let’s have a look at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unusual Tournament Posted September 26, 2019 #205 Share Posted September 26, 2019 54 minutes ago, hacktorp said: When Pelosi took a vote to begin an "official impeachment inquiry" (a meaningless title with zero precedent), she broke with protocol and refused to record the names of the legislators who voted in favor. Why would she do this? Because she knows what an absurdly risky gamble all of this is, with an enormous potential for political backlash against House members who will be up for re-election in 2020. So she hid their names to protect them. Not exactly a proud moment for the Dems! Yeah sure Hacktop. I bet she also put them on a different server. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian hacktorp Posted September 26, 2019 #206 Share Posted September 26, 2019 4 minutes ago, Captain Risky said: Yeah sure Hacktop. I bet she also put them on a different server. It's worse than that. She committed them to memory, so they're already lost. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OverSword Posted September 26, 2019 #207 Share Posted September 26, 2019 20 minutes ago, ExpandMyMind said: Well, Fox can have high factual reporting, but it has a history of outright fabrications. This is referring only to the news reporting section of the channel. The opinion area is the stuff of nightmares. Just like the WaPo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OverSword Posted September 26, 2019 #208 Share Posted September 26, 2019 22 minutes ago, hacktorp said: Imaginarynumber1: "Biden got no one fired." Biden (on camera): "I said, "you've got six hours to fire him, or you're not getting the money"...and, sonofab!tch, he got fired." Care to explain? eta: I see you've admitted your error. Care to explain why it would even matter whether it involved Hunter or not? Extortion is extortion, after all. It would not have mattered if Hunter weren't involved because he could have had a legitimate concern the money would be misused by corrupt people a corrupt prosecutor may be in bed with and that still could legitimately be the case although Hunter should have recused himself from serving on that companies board of directors to avoid the appearance of impropriety. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aztek Posted September 26, 2019 #209 Share Posted September 26, 2019 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian hacktorp Posted September 26, 2019 #210 Share Posted September 26, 2019 1 minute ago, OverSword said: It would not have mattered if Hunter weren't involved because he could have had a legitimate concern the money would be misused by corrupt people a corrupt prosecutor may be in bed with and that still could legitimately be the case although Hunter should have recused himself from serving on that companies board of directors to avoid the appearance of impropriety. All of the "if"s and "could have"s in the above demonstrate why this needs further looking into. With half a billion dollars exchanged amid plenty of apparent evidence of self-dealing, a deep investigation is wholly appropriate. Now, Dems seem to feel they are the only side qualified to investigate...whether it's investigating Trump OR themselves. Funny that, but certainly not everyone agrees. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skliss Posted September 26, 2019 #211 Share Posted September 26, 2019 50 minutes ago, RoofGardener said: Hmm.. most interesting.. thanks for that @ExpandMyMind. I've got one question though. Nancy Pelosi stated that it was "the law" that DNI did not pass on the whistleblower complaint immediately to congress. Is this REALLY a law ? Or just a departmental procedural rule ? If it IS a law, then WHICH law ? Did you watch the proceeding? One guy was grilling him on the subpoena and why he didn't bring it forward in 7 days, yada, yada and finally McGuire got in that he'd coordinated with the Chairman (Schiff) about the extra week.....and it was quickly dropped. Then afterwards....they started beating that dead horse again. I guess not only doesn't Pelosi read anything relevant, she doesn't watch anything either. The lieing right to our faces (the cameras) is unbelievably blatant! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davros of Skaro Posted September 26, 2019 #212 Share Posted September 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Captain Risky said: He clearly says he wants Europe to put up money. I was responding to that. Yes. Hence the "Mostly false" by Politifact. It's a debate what he actual meant (military vs monetary aid), but on the face of it he was wrong. Are Dems 100% correct all the time or something? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earl.Of.Trumps Posted September 26, 2019 #213 Share Posted September 26, 2019 4 hours ago, Captain Risky said: Just to be clear. Are you suggesting that it's okay to illegally investigate a political opponent AFTER Ukraine said tat there wasn't case to answer for? Just to be clear, are you suggesting that if the Ukraine conducted an investigation that it is an illegal investigation?? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imaginarynumber1 Posted September 26, 2019 #214 Share Posted September 26, 2019 59 minutes ago, OverSword said: Yes it does. It ensured his son made $50k a month from his role on the board of directors of that company. This all going on after we (Obama admin) funded and otherwise supported the overthrow of the previous Ukrainian government and replaced it with our own little puppets. Nothing to see here. Move along. Oh horse****. Ukraine was practically Russia before. And regardless of any wrongdoings by Biden or his kid, one act does not excuse the other. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imaginarynumber1 Posted September 26, 2019 #215 Share Posted September 26, 2019 1 hour ago, hacktorp said: Imaginarynumber1: "Biden got no one fired." Biden (on camera): "I said, "you've got six hours to fire him, or you're not getting the money"...and, sonofab!tch, he got fired." Care to explain? eta: I see you've admitted your error. Care to explain why it would even matter whether it involved Hunter or not? Extortion is extortion, after all. Because, as I said, even if Biden is guilty, it doesn't give trump the clearance to also commit extortion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian hacktorp Posted September 26, 2019 #216 Share Posted September 26, 2019 Does this help explain why the entire "swamp" seems to be in a tizzy over the Ukraine mess? BNL NEWS @BreakingNLive FollowFollow @BreakingNLive More BREAKING: Mitt Romney’s national security advisor from his 2012 campaign sits on the board of the Ukrainian gas company that paid Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden $50,000 a month 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davros of Skaro Posted September 26, 2019 #217 Share Posted September 26, 2019 8 minutes ago, Imaginarynumber1 said: Oh horse****. Ukraine was practically Russia before. And regardless of any wrongdoings by Biden or his kid, one act does not excuse the other. 7 minutes ago, Imaginarynumber1 said: Because, as I said, even if Biden is guilty, it doesn't give trump the clearance to also commit extortion. From the facts we have so far there is no extortion. You are seeing imaginary words, and pushing them as fact. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian hacktorp Posted September 26, 2019 #218 Share Posted September 26, 2019 3 minutes ago, Imaginarynumber1 said: Because, as I said, even if Biden is guilty, it doesn't give trump the clearance to also commit extortion. It sure doesn't. But if Biden is guilty, it seems ludicrous to give him (and Hunter) a pass just because Trump might benefit from Biden's downfall. At some point, the most egregious crimes need to be prosecuted, or we have no rule of law. I would rather be holding Trump's poker hand than Biden's right now. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OverSword Posted September 26, 2019 #219 Share Posted September 26, 2019 58 minutes ago, Imaginarynumber1 said: Oh horse****. Ukraine was practically Russia before. And regardless of any wrongdoings by Biden or his kid, one act does not excuse the other. Who's making excuses. If Biden did or did not use his position as VP to enrich his son then it should be verified in Senate, not on the back of some crap WaPo article. I think there is enough to be suspicious over and it should be checked. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OverSword Posted September 26, 2019 #220 Share Posted September 26, 2019 59 minutes ago, Imaginarynumber1 said: Because, as I said, even if Biden is guilty, it doesn't give trump the clearance to also commit extortion. There was none. The Ukraine, to the best of our knowledge, has not opened up an investigation and we gave them the aid money. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aztek Posted September 26, 2019 #221 Share Posted September 26, 2019 i wonder where did that money go, cuz as far as lives of regular people in Ukraine, it still just as bad as it was before, but the rada swamp buys new rolls royces, yachts, helicopters, and build even bigger villas. it was not help to Ukraine, it was politician's cut 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unusual Tournament Posted September 26, 2019 #222 Share Posted September 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Davros of Skaro said: Yes. Hence the "Mostly false" by Politifact. It's a debate what he actual meant (military vs monetary aid), but on the face of it he was wrong. Are Dems 100% correct all the time or something? In this case I think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unusual Tournament Posted September 26, 2019 #223 Share Posted September 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said: Just to be clear, are you suggesting that if the Ukraine conducted an investigation that it is an illegal investigation?? No it wouldn’t be illegal but rather a fishing expedition. Ukraine has already said there was not a case for the Bidens to answer before Trump threatened to hold back aid and made his private attorney the defacto U.S. ambassador. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davros of Skaro Posted September 26, 2019 #224 Share Posted September 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Captain Risky said: In this case I think so. Thinking so brings so much win. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OverSword Posted September 27, 2019 #225 Share Posted September 27, 2019 This 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now