Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
docyabut2

Discussing the mysteries of the ancient world

686 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

docyabut2

Plato wrote about  Atlantis at around 300bc,  300bc was 2316 years ago.

 This asteroid hit in the Atlantic  ocean  2,300 years ago

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/27827830/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/did-asteroid-cause-ancient-ny-tsunami/#.WP2Gtek2wzs

2,500-year-old city buried under flood sediment may belong to lost civilization in Spain

https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/2500-year-old-city-buried-under-flood-sediment-may-belong-lost-civilization-020521

it all so close to the guessing times .

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Davros of Skaro

Damn that Plato. Couldn't he just used a parable using animals, or plants instead?

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Piney
1 hour ago, docyabut2 said:

I told you this is a out of date article. The material is from around 34 Million years ago. :yes:

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
docyabut2
21 minutes ago, Piney said:

I told you this is a out of date article. The material is from around 34 Million years ago. :yes:

More than 2,300 years ago, a tsunami may have hit what is now New York City. The source of the giant wave, say geologists studying the sediments in nearby bodies of water, may have been a 330-foot-wide asteroid

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Peter Cox
1 hour ago, docyabut2 said:

Plato wrote about  Atlantis at around 300bc,  300bc was 2316 years ago.

 This asteroid hit in the Atlantic  ocean  2,300 years ago

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/27827830/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/did-asteroid-cause-ancient-ny-tsunami/#.WP2Gtek2wzs

2,500-year-old city buried under flood sediment may belong to lost civilization in Spain

https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/2500-year-old-city-buried-under-flood-sediment-may-belong-lost-civilization-020521

it all so close to the guessing times .

 

Atlantis according to Plato sunk 12000+ years ago. NOT 2300.................... So no this is a fantasy and no more. You only 10000 years out. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Orphalesion

Awww I thought this was about the Mystery Religions.

They would be a much more interesting topic, since they actually existed.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Piney
40 minutes ago, docyabut2 said:

More than 2,300 years ago, a tsunami may have hit what is now New York City. The source of the giant wave, say geologists studying the sediments in nearby bodies of water, may have been a 330-foot-wide asteroid

And a new study showed the it never happened. It would of wiped out the cultures that resided there and the sites show it didn't. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cormac mac airt
2 hours ago, Piney said:

And a new study showed the it never happened. It would of wiped out the cultures that resided there and the sites show it didn't. 

Do you have a link to the study?

cormac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Piney
Just now, cormac mac airt said:

Do you have a link to the study?

cormac

Nothing that isn't behind a paywall. But if you look at the Early Woodland transition there is no interruption. Nor is there a deposit over the habitation sites. 

I just don't feel like digging up all those papers and trying to explain it. It would be a waste of a lot of time. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jarocal
2 minutes ago, Piney said:

Nothing that isn't behind a paywall. But if you look at the Early Woodland transition there is no interruption. Nor is there a deposit over the habitation sites. 

I just don't feel like digging up all those papers and trying to explain it. It would be a waste of a lot of time. 

Dissemination of information properly researched is never a waste of time. That it may prove incomprehensible to the intended recipient is irrelevant.

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Piney
Just now, Jarocal said:

 That it may prove incomprehensible to the intended recipient is irrelevant.

There's a lot of incomprehension here lately. It's getting hard.....just sooo hard. :o

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cormac mac airt
7 minutes ago, Piney said:

Nothing that isn't behind a paywall. But if you look at the Early Woodland transition there is no interruption. Nor is there a deposit over the habitation sites. 

I just don't feel like digging up all those papers and trying to explain it. It would be a waste of a lot of time. 

I tend to agree with Jarocal on this one but ok. Maybe it could have been explained to docyabut2 since she's not exactly a great researcher. 

cormac

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Piney
Just now, cormac mac airt said:

I tend to agree with Jarocal on this one but ok. Maybe it could have been explained to docyabut2 since she's not exactly a great researcher. 

I tried to explain before that "It did not wipe out any Indian camps" but it didn't sink in. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cormac mac airt
1 minute ago, Piney said:

I tried to explain before that "It did not wipe out any Indian camps" but it didn't sink in. 

Sometimes it takes explaining what the actual studies have concluded, which was why I was hoping there was a link specifically negating the 2300 BP New York tsunami claim

cormac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Piney
Just now, cormac mac airt said:

Sometimes it takes explaining what the actual studies have concluded, which was why I was hoping there was a link specifically negating the 2300 BP New York tsunami claim

cormac

Let me look. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mellon Man
3 hours ago, Piney said:

And a new study showed the it never happened. It would of wiped out the cultures that resided there and the sites show it didn't. 

Would you mind citing the publication? Paywalls are not a problem. 

Thank you in advance. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cormac mac airt
6 hours ago, docyabut2 said:

Plato wrote about  Atlantis at around 300bc,  300bc was 2316 years ago.

 This asteroid hit in the Atlantic  ocean  2,300 years ago

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/27827830/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/did-asteroid-cause-ancient-ny-tsunami/#.WP2Gtek2wzs

2,500-year-old city buried under flood sediment may belong to lost civilization in Spain

https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/2500-year-old-city-buried-under-flood-sediment-may-belong-lost-civilization-020521

it all so close to the guessing times .

And is entirely irrelevant to Plato's Atlantis as he wrote that its destruction occurred some 9300 years PRIOR to that date. 

cormac

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Piney
12 minutes ago, Mellon Man said:

Would you mind citing the publication? Paywalls are not a problem. 

It is a counter argument to S. Goodbred, S Krentz and P. LoCicero's 2006 abstract

Evidence for a newly discovered 2300-year-old tsunami deposit from Long Island 

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Piney
7 minutes ago, Piney said:

It is a counter argument to S. Goodbred, S Krentz and P. LoCicero's 2006 abstract

Evidence for a newly discovered 2300-year-old tsunami deposit from Long Island 

@Doc Socks Junior   Can't find this paper. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
docyabut2

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8028949.stm

 gee all around the same time a  2,500-year-old city buried under flood sediment

2,500-year-old city buried under flood sediment may belong to lost civilization in Spain

https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/2500-year-old-city-buried-under-flood-sediment-may-belong-lost-civilization-020521

 

 

 

Edited by docyabut2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sir Wearer of Hats
1 hour ago, docyabut2 said:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8028949.stm

 gee all around the same time a  2,500-year-old city buried under flood sediment

2,500-year-old city buried under flood sediment may belong to lost civilization in Spain

https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/2500-year-old-city-buried-under-flood-sediment-may-belong-lost-civilization-020521

 

 

 

Doc, no one denies that cities can be buried, or sink under the seas. What we deny is that Atlantis specifically does not exist. Did not exist. Never did exist. Never will exist (to cover the inevitable arrival of Pettytalk). 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jodie.Lynne

@Saru Could we have a moratorium on Atlantis threads for a while? This is just a rehash of the same old damn assertions.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hanslune
3 minutes ago, Jodie.Lynne said:

@Saru Could we have a moratorium on Atlantis threads for a while? This is just a rehash of the same old damn assertions.

Completely agree this move on to something other than Atlantis

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sir Wearer of Hats

One great mystery for me is why did the builders of Stonehenge use stone from Wales, so far away from Avebury, in their construction.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
docyabut2
24 minutes ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said:

Doc, no one denies that cities can be buried, or sink under the seas. What we deny is that Atlantis specifically does not exist. Did not exist. Never did exist. Never will exist (to cover the inevitable arrival of Pettytalk). 

but to believe Atlantis did exist, I trying to find Atlantis did faced that small island , Gades, and what happened to them and  where Plato said it was and its history.

 

vxYQ7NLOjiwgYDGYyIDBNqDypafEQDChwKm9uYSlNJIk0w5i8nigoIdvFZU-LFc7dWHWqIz132-6n6xuDcoOhxebCntqzdGGMZkGpx-QAvpj6lGMGSmRKzgbGUtp3mTd-BXuH4Eh8NQ3ufldt5ipQn609dYrhj2jJo7G2sZLlp5O-PyWyFB2fQBTygLQwuyF2abDejdqbM4tOlwSkQLfybQUcrXQ87X6LyMHvH-5ZxsaCLYaslqWJfr4N6J1JkF7teutEoupr6ME_L3iISTvn6ZthPFUcIcHx9l_b7EtQTVPqMFtIn7lAEJ3RL67-pWhT6GQQnX1RAM2NOYwk-svE-PwYWzMifOcWFxw0CwNLeY-LOphwfOjQgbSWt0QvNzaz2rDYtlNoIQfgTkb-Mris0XC5Gjq4wqCOsp6rEIdvG-y4nuiQ5rAE46E7nlNaICdz_dqm5nk9so68S9NkP8GTD-IX5O9GcOZcjEIbnxKqIUhB59mG7lI3f_KZWL-aga9gnlRNyzK-wKSbT-JKjg6xBB4mdpP1b8xLHIahHZB7P3X3aRGwRR-oPs5tvIsjkQjwTbQGYSjKZu3U2M4lRnTNyXViCQ3DxTymXzPVAuKOiE4ppTAEPBpBQ=w400-no

Edited by docyabut2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.