docyabut2 Posted September 30, 2019 #1 Share Posted September 30, 2019 Plato wrote about Atlantis at around 300bc, 300bc was 2316 years ago. This asteroid hit in the Atlantic ocean 2,300 years ago http://www.nbcnews.com/id/27827830/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/did-asteroid-cause-ancient-ny-tsunami/#.WP2Gtek2wzs 2,500-year-old city buried under flood sediment may belong to lost civilization in Spain https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/2500-year-old-city-buried-under-flood-sediment-may-belong-lost-civilization-020521 it all so close to the guessing times . 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davros of Skaro Posted September 30, 2019 #2 Share Posted September 30, 2019 Damn that Plato. Couldn't he just used a parable using animals, or plants instead? 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted September 30, 2019 #3 Share Posted September 30, 2019 1 hour ago, docyabut2 said: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/27827830/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/did-asteroid-cause-ancient-ny-tsunami/#.WP2Gtek2wzs I told you this is a out of date article. The material is from around 34 Million years ago. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted September 30, 2019 Author #4 Share Posted September 30, 2019 21 minutes ago, Piney said: I told you this is a out of date article. The material is from around 34 Million years ago. More than 2,300 years ago, a tsunami may have hit what is now New York City. The source of the giant wave, say geologists studying the sediments in nearby bodies of water, may have been a 330-foot-wide asteroid 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Cox Posted September 30, 2019 #5 Share Posted September 30, 2019 1 hour ago, docyabut2 said: Plato wrote about Atlantis at around 300bc, 300bc was 2316 years ago. This asteroid hit in the Atlantic ocean 2,300 years ago http://www.nbcnews.com/id/27827830/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/did-asteroid-cause-ancient-ny-tsunami/#.WP2Gtek2wzs 2,500-year-old city buried under flood sediment may belong to lost civilization in Spain https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/2500-year-old-city-buried-under-flood-sediment-may-belong-lost-civilization-020521 it all so close to the guessing times . Atlantis according to Plato sunk 12000+ years ago. NOT 2300.................... So no this is a fantasy and no more. You only 10000 years out. 5 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orphalesion Posted September 30, 2019 #6 Share Posted September 30, 2019 Awww I thought this was about the Mystery Religions. They would be a much more interesting topic, since they actually existed. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted September 30, 2019 #7 Share Posted September 30, 2019 40 minutes ago, docyabut2 said: More than 2,300 years ago, a tsunami may have hit what is now New York City. The source of the giant wave, say geologists studying the sediments in nearby bodies of water, may have been a 330-foot-wide asteroid And a new study showed the it never happened. It would of wiped out the cultures that resided there and the sites show it didn't. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cormac mac airt Posted September 30, 2019 #8 Share Posted September 30, 2019 2 hours ago, Piney said: And a new study showed the it never happened. It would of wiped out the cultures that resided there and the sites show it didn't. Do you have a link to the study? cormac 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted September 30, 2019 #9 Share Posted September 30, 2019 Just now, cormac mac airt said: Do you have a link to the study? cormac Nothing that isn't behind a paywall. But if you look at the Early Woodland transition there is no interruption. Nor is there a deposit over the habitation sites. I just don't feel like digging up all those papers and trying to explain it. It would be a waste of a lot of time. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarocal Posted September 30, 2019 #10 Share Posted September 30, 2019 2 minutes ago, Piney said: Nothing that isn't behind a paywall. But if you look at the Early Woodland transition there is no interruption. Nor is there a deposit over the habitation sites. I just don't feel like digging up all those papers and trying to explain it. It would be a waste of a lot of time. Dissemination of information properly researched is never a waste of time. That it may prove incomprehensible to the intended recipient is irrelevant. 2 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted September 30, 2019 #11 Share Posted September 30, 2019 Just now, Jarocal said: That it may prove incomprehensible to the intended recipient is irrelevant. There's a lot of incomprehension here lately. It's getting hard.....just sooo hard. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cormac mac airt Posted September 30, 2019 #12 Share Posted September 30, 2019 7 minutes ago, Piney said: Nothing that isn't behind a paywall. But if you look at the Early Woodland transition there is no interruption. Nor is there a deposit over the habitation sites. I just don't feel like digging up all those papers and trying to explain it. It would be a waste of a lot of time. I tend to agree with Jarocal on this one but ok. Maybe it could have been explained to docyabut2 since she's not exactly a great researcher. cormac 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted September 30, 2019 #13 Share Posted September 30, 2019 Just now, cormac mac airt said: I tend to agree with Jarocal on this one but ok. Maybe it could have been explained to docyabut2 since she's not exactly a great researcher. I tried to explain before that "It did not wipe out any Indian camps" but it didn't sink in. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cormac mac airt Posted September 30, 2019 #14 Share Posted September 30, 2019 1 minute ago, Piney said: I tried to explain before that "It did not wipe out any Indian camps" but it didn't sink in. Sometimes it takes explaining what the actual studies have concluded, which was why I was hoping there was a link specifically negating the 2300 BP New York tsunami claim. cormac 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted September 30, 2019 #15 Share Posted September 30, 2019 Just now, cormac mac airt said: Sometimes it takes explaining what the actual studies have concluded, which was why I was hoping there was a link specifically negating the 2300 BP New York tsunami claim. cormac Let me look. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mellon Man Posted September 30, 2019 #16 Share Posted September 30, 2019 3 hours ago, Piney said: And a new study showed the it never happened. It would of wiped out the cultures that resided there and the sites show it didn't. Would you mind citing the publication? Paywalls are not a problem. Thank you in advance. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cormac mac airt Posted September 30, 2019 #17 Share Posted September 30, 2019 6 hours ago, docyabut2 said: Plato wrote about Atlantis at around 300bc, 300bc was 2316 years ago. This asteroid hit in the Atlantic ocean 2,300 years ago http://www.nbcnews.com/id/27827830/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/did-asteroid-cause-ancient-ny-tsunami/#.WP2Gtek2wzs 2,500-year-old city buried under flood sediment may belong to lost civilization in Spain https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/2500-year-old-city-buried-under-flood-sediment-may-belong-lost-civilization-020521 it all so close to the guessing times . And is entirely irrelevant to Plato's Atlantis as he wrote that its destruction occurred some 9300 years PRIOR to that date. cormac 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted September 30, 2019 #18 Share Posted September 30, 2019 12 minutes ago, Mellon Man said: Would you mind citing the publication? Paywalls are not a problem. It is a counter argument to S. Goodbred, S Krentz and P. LoCicero's 2006 abstract Evidence for a newly discovered 2300-year-old tsunami deposit from Long Island 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted September 30, 2019 #19 Share Posted September 30, 2019 7 minutes ago, Piney said: It is a counter argument to S. Goodbred, S Krentz and P. LoCicero's 2006 abstract Evidence for a newly discovered 2300-year-old tsunami deposit from Long Island @Doc Socks Junior Can't find this paper. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted September 30, 2019 Author #20 Share Posted September 30, 2019 (edited) http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8028949.stm gee all around the same time a 2,500-year-old city buried under flood sediment 2,500-year-old city buried under flood sediment may belong to lost civilization in Spain https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/2500-year-old-city-buried-under-flood-sediment-may-belong-lost-civilization-020521 Edited September 30, 2019 by docyabut2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted September 30, 2019 #21 Share Posted September 30, 2019 1 hour ago, docyabut2 said: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8028949.stm gee all around the same time a 2,500-year-old city buried under flood sediment 2,500-year-old city buried under flood sediment may belong to lost civilization in Spain https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/2500-year-old-city-buried-under-flood-sediment-may-belong-lost-civilization-020521 Doc, no one denies that cities can be buried, or sink under the seas. What we deny is that Atlantis specifically does not exist. Did not exist. Never did exist. Never will exist (to cover the inevitable arrival of Pettytalk). 2 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jodie.Lynne Posted September 30, 2019 #22 Share Posted September 30, 2019 @Saru Could we have a moratorium on Atlantis threads for a while? This is just a rehash of the same old damn assertions. 3 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanslune Posted September 30, 2019 #23 Share Posted September 30, 2019 3 minutes ago, Jodie.Lynne said: @Saru Could we have a moratorium on Atlantis threads for a while? This is just a rehash of the same old damn assertions. Completely agree this move on to something other than Atlantis 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted September 30, 2019 #24 Share Posted September 30, 2019 One great mystery for me is why did the builders of Stonehenge use stone from Wales, so far away from Avebury, in their construction. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted September 30, 2019 Author #25 Share Posted September 30, 2019 (edited) 24 minutes ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said: Doc, no one denies that cities can be buried, or sink under the seas. What we deny is that Atlantis specifically does not exist. Did not exist. Never did exist. Never will exist (to cover the inevitable arrival of Pettytalk). but to believe Atlantis did exist, I trying to find Atlantis did faced that small island , Gades, and what happened to them and where Plato said it was and its history. Edited September 30, 2019 by docyabut2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now