spartan max2 Posted November 12, 2019 Author #151 Share Posted November 12, 2019 1 minute ago, Hankenhunter said: Yup, she outed herself by responding and the doubled down on it. Good call on the vote splitting, Farmer. I guess to be a Democrat you are not allowed to respond to slander if it's from Hillary lol. That sounds ridioclous All news organizations knew who Hillary was talking about. Everyone knew it was about her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hankenhunter Posted November 13, 2019 #152 Share Posted November 13, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, spartan max2 said: I guess to be a Democrat you are not allowed to respond to slander if it's from Hillary lol. That sounds ridioclous All news organizations knew who Hillary was talking about. Everyone knew it was about her. The only thing ridiculous is the severe lack of critical thinking skills being displayed by repubs. Links where Hillary actually named her would be helpful, but alas, none will be forthcoming as there are none. Case dismissed. Edited November 13, 2019 by Hankenhunter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hankenhunter Posted November 13, 2019 #153 Share Posted November 13, 2019 1 hour ago, spartan max2 said: I guess to be a Democrat you are not allowed to respond to slander if it's from Hillary lol. That sounds ridioclous All news organizations knew who Hillary was talking about. Everyone knew it was about her. Aren't these "news organizations" the same ones that Republicans are calling fake news media? So why are you believing them now? Because it suits you to cherry pick, right? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hankenhunter Posted November 13, 2019 #154 Share Posted November 13, 2019 Whether Tulsi likes it or not, she's tainted goods now. You can't blame the Dems for this. Blame the Russians who are still manipulating the election process in America. With bought and paid for help from Moscow Mitch and associates. They are the ones lauding Gabbard. This guy's an expert and makes some very compelling points. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.newsweek.com/tulsi-gabbard-being-used-russians-former-us-double-agent-evidence-clear-opinion-1466750&ved=2ahUKEwj-yueLheblAhXBu54KHQdiBEIQFjAFegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw238gAyC_yLjcPh-laTwLtV&cshid=1573608749897 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skulduggery Posted November 13, 2019 #155 Share Posted November 13, 2019 Right now, the way I see it, the DNC has dug itself into a hole. Now, I’m no Republican. Far from it. I am very liberal and registered independent. I always lean left. I am very much a supporter of Tulsi and Bernie, too. Right now, with this type of harassment by the top brass, the party can go **** itself. They are honestly out of touch with everything, reality included. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spartan max2 Posted November 13, 2019 Author #156 Share Posted November 13, 2019 (edited) 39 minutes ago, Hankenhunter said: The only thing ridiculous is the severe lack of critical thinking skills being displayed by repubs. Links where Hillary actually named her would be helpful, but alas, none will be forthcoming as there are none. Case dismissed. Odd Hillary never felt the need to clarify who she was talking about lol. She easily could make a statement that she wasn't talking about Gabbard. You think she would want to if she wasn't talking about Gabbard. So tell me, which democrat candidate do you think she was referring to? Is it reasonable to accuse any of them of being a Russian asset? Should we go back to the red scare and claim people are working for the Russians whenever they do things we disagree with lol Those are the critical thinking questions Hank. Edited November 13, 2019 by spartan max2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hankenhunter Posted November 13, 2019 #157 Share Posted November 13, 2019 14 minutes ago, spartan max2 said: Odd Hillary never felt the need to clarify who she was talking about lol. She easily could make a statement that she wasn't talking about Gabbard. You think she would want to if she wasn't talking about Gabbard. So tell me, which democrat candidate do you think she was referring to? Is it reasonable to accuse any of them of being a Russian asset? Should we go back to the red scare and claim people are working for the Russians whenever they do things we disagree with lol Those are the critical thinking questions Hank. Doesnt matter. It's what's legal that counts. The Republicans accused Obama of a lot of stupid things that they weren't held accountable for. But thats okay right? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spartan max2 Posted November 13, 2019 Author #158 Share Posted November 13, 2019 6 minutes ago, Hankenhunter said: Doesnt matter. It's what's legal that counts. The Republicans accused Obama of a lot of stupid things that they weren't held accountable for. But thats okay right? Some what-aboutism lol. I don't disagree with you. That's irrelevant to this thread though. If you don't believe what Hillary said was stupid then don't defend it. You don't have to defend every stupid thing a Democrat politician does because you don't like Republicans. And vice versa to the Republicans of UM. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farmer77 Posted November 13, 2019 #159 Share Posted November 13, 2019 43 minutes ago, Hankenhunter said: This guy's an expert and makes some very compelling points. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.newsweek.com/tulsi-gabbard-being-used-russians-former-us-double-agent-evidence-clear-opinion-1466750&ved=2ahUKEwj-yueLheblAhXBu54KHQdiBEIQFjAFegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw238gAyC_yLjcPh-laTwLtV&cshid=1573608749897 Good article that basically sums up my position. Thanks for the share. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hankenhunter Posted November 13, 2019 #160 Share Posted November 13, 2019 32 minutes ago, spartan max2 said: Odd Hillary never felt the need to clarify who she was talking about lol. She easily could make a statement that she wasn't talking about Gabbard. You think she would want to if she wasn't talking about Gabbard. So tell me, which democrat candidate do you think she was referring to? Is it reasonable to accuse any of them of being a Russian asset? Should we go back to the red scare and claim people are working for the Russians whenever they do things we disagree with lol Those are the critical thinking questions Hank. Yes, I saw your confused look. It's kinda humorous because Hillary is being singled out for what she said, yet trump gets a free pass for the hundreds of times he's said worse. Polititions say snide things to each other every day, or haven't you been listening. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Commander Travis Posted November 13, 2019 #161 Share Posted November 13, 2019 16 hours ago, Farmer77 said: Considering what we now know about the multiple intelligence operations against our elections That they were extremely tiny and utterly ineffectual in influencing the vote in favour of Hitler? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Commander Travis Posted November 13, 2019 #162 Share Posted November 13, 2019 13 hours ago, Hankenhunter said: Whether Tulsi likes it or not, she's tainted goods now. You can't blame the Dems for this. Blame the Russians who are still manipulating the election process in America. With bought and paid for help from Moscow Mitch and associates. They are the ones lauding Gabbard. You mean the Russian media are the only ones that talk any sense about topics that deserve talking about? Well, sign me up for a subscription to those Kremlin Talking Points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Commander Travis Posted November 13, 2019 #163 Share Posted November 13, 2019 13 hours ago, Hankenhunter said: Whether Tulsi likes it or not, she's tainted goods now. You can't blame the Dems for this. Blame the Russians who are still manipulating the election process in America. With bought and paid for help from Moscow Mitch and associates. They are the ones lauding Gabbard. ussians Have you ever criticised the way the "Democratic" Party manipulated its own democratic processes by rigging its own primaries so that votes that people thought where going to B. Sanders were actually diverted to H. Clinton, since the Party knew that that was who people really wanted all along? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Desertrat56 Posted November 13, 2019 #164 Share Posted November 13, 2019 14 hours ago, Hankenhunter said: The only thing ridiculous is the severe lack of critical thinking skills being displayed by repubs. Links where Hillary actually named her would be helpful, but alas, none will be forthcoming as there are none. Case dismissed. The lack of critical thinking is being displayed by both democrats and republicans. Anyone who considers one group the enemy and the other "**** don't stink" is not employing critical thinking or reason of any kind. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now