Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
spartan max2

Tulsi Gabbard and Jill Stien Russian assets

164 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

spartan max2
1 minute ago, Hankenhunter said:

Yup, she outed herself by responding and the doubled down on it. Good call on the vote splitting, Farmer.

I guess to be a Democrat you are not allowed to respond to slander if it's from Hillary lol. 

That sounds ridioclous

All news organizations knew who Hillary was talking about. Everyone knew it was about her. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Hankenhunter
1 hour ago, spartan max2 said:

I guess to be a Democrat you are not allowed to respond to slander if it's from Hillary lol. 

That sounds ridioclous

All news organizations knew who Hillary was talking about. Everyone knew it was about her. 

The only thing ridiculous is the severe lack of critical thinking skills being displayed by repubs. Links where Hillary actually named her would be helpful, but alas, none will be forthcoming as there are none. Case dismissed. 

Edited by Hankenhunter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hankenhunter
1 hour ago, spartan max2 said:

I guess to be a Democrat you are not allowed to respond to slander if it's from Hillary lol. 

That sounds ridioclous

All news organizations knew who Hillary was talking about. Everyone knew it was about her. 

Aren't these "news organizations" the same ones that Republicans are calling fake news media? So why are you believing them now? Because it suits you to cherry pick, right?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hankenhunter

Whether Tulsi likes it or not, she's tainted goods now. You can't blame the Dems for this. Blame the Russians who are still manipulating the election process in America. With bought and paid for help from Moscow Mitch and associates. They are the ones lauding Gabbard.

This guy's an expert and makes some very compelling points. 

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.newsweek.com/tulsi-gabbard-being-used-russians-former-us-double-agent-evidence-clear-opinion-1466750&ved=2ahUKEwj-yueLheblAhXBu54KHQdiBEIQFjAFegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw238gAyC_yLjcPh-laTwLtV&cshid=1573608749897

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Skulduggery

Right now, the way I see it, the DNC has dug itself into a hole. Now, I’m no Republican. Far from it. I am very liberal and registered independent. I always lean left. I am very much a supporter of Tulsi and Bernie, too. Right now, with this type of harassment by the top brass, the party can go **** itself. They are honestly out of touch with everything, reality included.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
spartan max2
39 minutes ago, Hankenhunter said:

The only thing ridiculous is the severe lack of critical thinking skills being displayed by repubs. Links where Hillary actually named her would be helpful, but alas, none will be forthcoming as there are none. Case dismissed. 

Odd Hillary never felt the need to clarify who she was talking about lol.

She easily could make a statement that she wasn't talking about Gabbard. 

You think she would want to if she wasn't talking about Gabbard. 

So tell me, which democrat candidate do you think she was referring to? 

Is it reasonable to accuse any of them of being a Russian asset? Should we go back to the red scare and claim people are working for the Russians whenever they do things we disagree with lol

Those are the critical thinking questions Hank. 

Edited by spartan max2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hankenhunter
14 minutes ago, spartan max2 said:

Odd Hillary never felt the need to clarify who she was talking about lol.

She easily could make a statement that she wasn't talking about Gabbard. 

You think she would want to if she wasn't talking about Gabbard. 

So tell me, which democrat candidate do you think she was referring to? 

Is it reasonable to accuse any of them of being a Russian asset? Should we go back to the red scare and claim people are working for the Russians whenever they do things we disagree with lol

Those are the critical thinking questions Hank. 

Doesnt matter. It's what's legal that counts. The Republicans accused Obama of a lot of stupid things that they weren't held accountable for. But thats okay right?

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
spartan max2
6 minutes ago, Hankenhunter said:

Doesnt matter. It's what's legal that counts. The Republicans accused Obama of a lot of stupid things that they weren't held accountable for. But thats okay right?

Some what-aboutism lol.

I don't disagree with you.

That's irrelevant to this thread though.

If you don't believe what Hillary said was stupid then don't defend it. 

You don't have to defend every stupid thing a Democrat politician does because you don't like Republicans.

And vice versa to the Republicans of UM.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Farmer77

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hankenhunter
32 minutes ago, spartan max2 said:

Odd Hillary never felt the need to clarify who she was talking about lol.

She easily could make a statement that she wasn't talking about Gabbard. 

You think she would want to if she wasn't talking about Gabbard. 

So tell me, which democrat candidate do you think she was referring to? 

Is it reasonable to accuse any of them of being a Russian asset? Should we go back to the red scare and claim people are working for the Russians whenever they do things we disagree with lol

Those are the critical thinking questions Hank. 

Yes, I saw your confused look. It's kinda humorous because Hillary is being singled out for what she said, yet trump gets a free pass for the hundreds of times he's said worse. Polititions say snide things to each other every day, or haven't  you been listening.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Montmorency the Dog
16 hours ago, Farmer77 said:

Considering what we now know about the multiple intelligence operations against our elections

That they were extremely tiny and utterly ineffectual in influencing the vote in favour of Hitler? 

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Montmorency the Dog
13 hours ago, Hankenhunter said:

Whether Tulsi likes it or not, she's tainted goods now. You can't blame the Dems for this. Blame the Russians who are still manipulating the election process in America. With bought and paid for help from Moscow Mitch and associates. They are the ones lauding Gabbard.

 

You mean the Russian media are the only ones that talk any sense about topics that deserve talking about? Well, sign me up for a subscription to those Kremlin Talking Points. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Montmorency the Dog
13 hours ago, Hankenhunter said:

Whether Tulsi likes it or not, she's tainted goods now. You can't blame the Dems for this. Blame the Russians who are still manipulating the election process in America. With bought and paid for help from Moscow Mitch and associates. They are the ones lauding Gabbard. ussians 

Have you ever criticised the way the "Democratic" Party manipulated its own democratic processes by rigging its own primaries so that votes that people thought where going to B. Sanders were actually diverted to H. Clinton, since the Party knew that that was who people really wanted all along? 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Desertrat56
14 hours ago, Hankenhunter said:

The only thing ridiculous is the severe lack of critical thinking skills being displayed by repubs. Links where Hillary actually named her would be helpful, but alas, none will be forthcoming as there are none. Case dismissed. 

The lack of critical thinking is being displayed by both democrats and republicans.  Anyone who considers one group the enemy and the other "**** don't stink" is not employing critical thinking or reason of any kind.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.