stereologist Posted October 22, 2019 #26 Share Posted October 22, 2019 Now go to page 21. Article D is about the government testing the materials and reporting back to TTSA about what their tests determine. I think this is a contract for the TTSA to spend 3/4 of a million to have the government test things they think are alien in origin. Under D.2 I gather that there are things from Puthoff that are to be shared. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Desertrat56 Posted October 22, 2019 #27 Share Posted October 22, 2019 4 hours ago, UM-Bot said: The military has teamed up with Tom DeLonge's 'To The Stars' group to study alleged UFO 'metamaterials'. https://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/news/331435/us-army-signs-deal-to-exploit-ufo-technology What a bunch of tripe. "The Military", no, Tom DeLonge is a carnival act. No real military would "team up" with him for any reason. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted October 22, 2019 #28 Share Posted October 22, 2019 52 minutes ago, ThereWeAreThen said: And who is this slag we are speaking of? Some Brummie ye thinks.... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grey Area Posted October 22, 2019 #29 Share Posted October 22, 2019 11 minutes ago, Piney said: Some Brummie ye thinks.... Nah, Brummies are slappers. Slags are from London. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bison Posted October 22, 2019 #30 Share Posted October 22, 2019 (edited) The source of this story is United Press International. This is a long-established and reputable news-gathering organization with a reputation to uphold. I see no reason why they would feature a story they determined to be sensationalist and unverified, and so, risk harming the trust and respect they've earned over more than a century. Edited October 22, 2019 by bison 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the13bats Posted October 22, 2019 #31 Share Posted October 22, 2019 1 hour ago, stereologist said: Please check the section on page 19. It sounds like this is an agreement for the TTSA to get its materials tested at a government site and that the flow of money is from the TTSA to the government. Ah, now the smoke clears, if the gov says yeah, nice melted beer cans we will never hear that, they we do some hat trick not pay and the gov will say get lost and they will say the gov couldnt indentify it. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Desertrat56 Posted October 22, 2019 #32 Share Posted October 22, 2019 (edited) I did a search for U.S. Army Futures and found nothing. Anyone else try a search for the person who supposedly represents the military department that created this document? I didn't get anything on Joseph Cannon either. Ok. Typed in something else and got this: https://www.meritalk.com/articles/army-futures-command-to-reallocate-over-30-billion-to-modernization-priorities/?gclid=Cj0KCQjw0brtBRDOARIsANMDykaoA_U6BtZCYutqqN44mXCyDLzcjTRSeFWjaPLbr37lIq4I4IxXlKUaAu_YEALw_wcB Edited October 22, 2019 by Desertrat56 link 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted October 22, 2019 #33 Share Posted October 22, 2019 The named group appears to be legitimate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Army_Futures_Command Quote United States Army Futures Command (AFC)[3][4] is a United States Army command aimed at modernizing the Army.[5][6][7] It focuses on six priorities:[Note 1] long-range precision fires,[8][9] next-generation combat vehicle,[10] future vertical lift platforms,[11] a mobile & expeditionary Army network,[12] air & missile defense capabilities,[13] and soldier lethality. The future vertical lift platforms linked to this article https://www.army.mil/article/204513/new_army_aircraft_will_be_durable_lethal_unmanned_for_modern_conflicts Quote all FVL will, in general terms, be intuitive to operate and be built to outperform current aircraft in speed, low radar signature, payload, survivability, agility, and lethality 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Desertrat56 Posted October 22, 2019 #34 Share Posted October 22, 2019 2 minutes ago, stereologist said: The named group appears to be legitimate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Army_Futures_Command The future vertical lift platforms linked to this article https://www.army.mil/article/204513/new_army_aircraft_will_be_durable_lethal_unmanned_for_modern_conflicts Were you able to find anything on Joseph Cannon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted October 22, 2019 #35 Share Posted October 22, 2019 Here is another article which seems like BS. https://taskandpurpose.com/army-ttsa-contract-blink-182-tom-delonge Quote the research capabilities flaunts TTSA's research into "space-time metric engineering, quantum physics, beamed energy propulsion, and active camouflage," Since when did they do any of that? That's right they have a deal with Puthoff. The again I don't think that someone read the contract or asked the right questions because it states the following. Quote To be clear, there's no money changing hands between the Army and TTSA Then I found this at the Black Vault https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/u-s-army-releases-crada-with-to-the-stars-academy-of-arts-science/ Quote “TTSA has a set of different materials, the properties of which they’re interested in investigating the properties. As materials research in general is of key interest to Army research, the Army is interested in any insights gained from investigating the properties of these materials, too,” Dr. Halleaux stated in an e-mail to The Black Vault. “In this case, the Army is providing the expertise and facilities to analyze the materials, and TTSA is providing the materials themselves; both parties receive the results of the analysis. Just as there is no financial compensation to TTSA for the use of the materials, there is no financial compensation to the Army for the use of the facilities.” Apparently, TTSA has angered investors who think that the government is hiding secrets and not TTSA is being secretive. Also Quote As for the metamaterial currently in the possession of TTSA, some of it is referenced as being “on loan” in recent SEC filings. The Black Vault reached out to someone associated with at least one of the pieces in TTSA’s possession, seeking comment on the news about this new agreement. This person requested they remain anonymous, and respectfully declined to comment due to the fact they signed a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) with TTSA, which prohibits them from doing so. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted October 22, 2019 #36 Share Posted October 22, 2019 9 minutes ago, Desertrat56 said: Were you able to find anything on Joseph Cannon? Didn't look yet. It seems this agreement is an actual agreement. Oddly enough the Army claims there is no payment as far as examination of the materials is concerned. Section 7.5.1 must refer to things other than the analysis of the physical materials. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Desertrat56 Posted October 22, 2019 #37 Share Posted October 22, 2019 3 minutes ago, stereologist said: Didn't look yet. It seems this agreement is an actual agreement. Oddly enough the Army claims there is no payment as far as examination of the materials is concerned. Section 7.5.1 must refer to things other than the analysis of the physical materials. Interesting. Maybe it is a way to get the materials and see if DeLonge's claims are real. Seems like there should be some wording about non-disclosure in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted October 22, 2019 #38 Share Posted October 22, 2019 This is definitely worth the read. https://gizmodo.com/uh-the-army-just-contracted-with-tom-delonges-ufo-gr-1839176479 Quote Other technologies referenced by the Army, like inertial mass reduction and electromagnetic metamaterial wave guides, have come up in absolutely bizarre U.S. Navy patents that the Drive reported the Navy has strongly advocated for and even in some cases claimed were operable, despite immense skepticism from physicists the site consulted. That is just a tidbit of the discussion in that article. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted October 22, 2019 #39 Share Posted October 22, 2019 1 minute ago, Desertrat56 said: Interesting. Maybe it is a way to get the materials and see if DeLonge's claims are real. Seems like there should be some wording about non-disclosure in it. This is all unclassified work. Some of the articles I have linked to mention that the military knows where the materials came from. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vorg Posted October 22, 2019 #40 Share Posted October 22, 2019 (edited) A statement by TTSA, an organization founded by former Blink-182 member Tom DeLonge, said the academy has technology solutions "in material science, space-time metric engineering, quantum physics, beamed energy propulsion, and active camouflage, [which] have the potential to enhance survivability and effectiveness of multiple Army systems." A TTSA statement on Thursday defines the organization as a "collaboration between academia, industry and pop culture to advance society's understanding of scientific phenomena and its technological implications." https://www.upi.com/Defense-News/2019/10/21/Army-inks-deal-with-Blink-182-founder-for-UFO-weapons-research/8641571683574/ Edited October 22, 2019 by South Alabam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twas Brillig Posted October 28, 2019 #41 Share Posted October 28, 2019 Thank you Tom DeLonge, for selling out to the military, way to go ****head! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the13bats Posted October 28, 2019 #42 Share Posted October 28, 2019 3 hours ago, Twas Brillig said: Thank you Tom DeLonge, for selling out to the military, way to go ****head! Yeah..cuz Tom was such a pillar before that 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now