Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
ExpandMyMind

lone senate Dem opposed to net neutrality,

Recommended Posts

ExpandMyMind
Quote

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, the only Senate Democrat who has not co-sponsored legislation to restore net neutrality, reportedly has financial ties to a super PAC directed by a lobbyist for Comcast, a fervent opponent of open internet protections.

Sludge's Donald Shaw reported Thursday that a possible reason behind Sinema's refusal to join her Democratic colleagues in backing the Save the Internet Act "may be her relationship with a 'dark money' nonprofit called Center Forward that receives substantial funding from cable and telecom industry trade groups and its affiliated super PAC, Center Forward Committee, which is run by a Comcast lobbyist."

"Sinema directed a six-figure donation to Center Forward Committee through a centrist PAC that she used to chair just weeks before the group made big independent expenditures to support Sinema's campaigns," according to Shaw.

Telecom industry lobbying groups have given Center Forward "substantial and consistent donations," Sludge found in a review of tax documents.

https://www.salon.com/2019/11/08/sen-sinema-lone-senate-democrat-opposed-to-net-neutrality-tied-to-comcast-lobbyists-dark-money/

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
joc

So....why is this news worthy? In short...it isn't.  But I'll ask a different way...Why then is it a news story?  Ah!  Because she isn't siding with the rest of her party who is just as corrupt as she is.  So...in even shorter....if you buck their system of voting...they'll destroy you!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Desertrat56
3 hours ago, ExpandMyMind said:

Of course she does.  Now we all know who owns her and there can be a campaign to get rid of her (voter he out in the next election).  I know that the pharmacuetical companies paid big bucks to get Clinton and Obama elected because of the craziness revolving around the flue shots that went on right after they were inaugurated.  Trump is owned by the oil companies, hence the attempts at selling public lands to oil companies or giving access to those lands to the oil companies.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.