Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Humans have a natural lifespan of only 38 yrs


WVK

Recommended Posts

"Humans have a maximum natural lifespan of only 38 years, according to researchers, who have discovered a way to estimate how long a species lives based on its DNA.Scientists at Australia's national science agency have developed a genetic 'clock' computer model that they claim can accurately estimate how long different vertebrates are likely to survive - including both living and extinct species."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-7785761/Humans-genetically-hardwired-live-38-YEARS.html

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, XenoFish said:

Oops, I'm three years past my expiration date.

I can't even remember when I exceeded my "sell by" date...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like BS. Humans have made it past 38 for centuries, if not killed by disease.

If someone didn't die from disease then it was normal from them to like into their 60s and up 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, WVK said:

"Humans have a maximum natural lifespan of only 38 years, according to researchers, who have discovered a way to estimate how long a species lives based on its DNA.Scientists at Australia's national science agency have developed a genetic 'clock' computer model that they claim can accurately estimate how long different vertebrates are likely to survive - including both living and extinct species."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-7785761/Humans-genetically-hardwired-live-38-YEARS.html

Well thats obviously wrong lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The title was changed to Humans have a natural lifespan of only 38 yrs
10 minutes ago, spartan max2 said:

If someone didn't die from disease then it was normal from them to like into their 60s and up 

Nope, your average pre-contact Indian lived to about 35-40. Your average Eurasian nomad the same.  That's why the elderly were so respected. There wasn't many of them. 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys I have thought about this.

I have never broken anything, I have never had a disease or been severally ill. But, I have had 2 tooth extractions in my 41 years. I suspect they would have all killed a lot of people 1000 years ago.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RabidMongoose said:

Guys I have thought about this.

I have never broken anything, I have never had a disease or been severally ill. But, I have had 2 tooth extractions in my 41 years. I suspect they would have all killed a lot of people 1000 years ago.

That was one of the biggest problems, especially after farming began. Death by abscess. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Piney said:

Nope, your average pre-contact Indian lived to about 35-40. Your average Eurasian nomad the same.  That's why the elderly were so respected. There wasn't many of them. 

That's very interesting, I can see how this would make sense.  Did they come to this conclusion through examination of remains? 

I suppose the introduction of better medical treatments has changed everything.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Piney said:

Nope, your average pre-contact Indian lived to about 35-40. Your average Eurasian nomad the same.  That's why the elderly were so respected. There wasn't many of them. 

I'm not arguing average lifespan, what I'm asserting is that the body is not "hardwired" to die at 38. It goes up to in the sixties if we get rid of external problems like disease, not enough food, etc. That's external things Killin the body, not the body timing out.

For example,

Quote

Between 1200–1599 and 1600–1900, the median age of Popes at starting pontificate increased from 60.0 to 65.5 years, while the median duration of pontificate raised from 6.5 to 11.0 years, respectively (Table 1). The median age at death of both groups increased in the study period, from 66 to 77 years for Popes, and from 63 to 70 years for artists (Table 1).

https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/34/6/1435/707557

Edited by spartan max2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Piney said:

That was one of the biggest problems, especially after farming began. Death by abscess. 

I also suspect that many died from viruses like the simple Flu, I know the European expansion into the Americas had severe effects, but even before I would think they still had viral infections that could be deadly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, XenoFish said:

Vinegar is one hell of an antiseptic.

Yes it is, it's the ascetic acid that makes it a good bacterial solution.

Edited by Manwon Lender
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Manwon Lender said:

Yes it is, it's the ascetic acid that makes it a good bacterial solution.

I can't remember where I read it from, but I think they used honey on wounds as well. Not sure if I'm correct on that though. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, spartan max2 said:

I'm not arguing average lifespan, what I'm asserting is that the body is not "hardwired" to die at 38. It goes up to in the sixties if we get rid of external problems like disease, not enough food, etc. That's external things Killin the body, not the body timing out.

About 115, Is what DNA is wired for. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go Daily Mail for making an article not quite right.... at least they put in the link to the study.

A couple interesting snippets from the study:

Quote

We removed humans (Homo sapiens) from the data set as they were listed with a maximum lifespan of 120 years, which does not reflect the variability and the true global average lifespan (60.9–86.3 years)38.

Quote

We also examined whether lifespan estimates for humans significantly differed from their close relatives, including chimpanzees51,52 and extinct members of the Hominidae family, Denisovans53 (Homo denisova) and Neanderthals54 (Homo neanderthalensis). The lifespan clock estimated a 38.0 year lifespan for humans (hg19). The maximum lifespans of humans is a controversial topic55,56. In the past 200 years, the average life expectancy of humans has more than doubled because of modern medicine and changes in lifestyle57,58. Early humans have been reported to have a maximum life expectancy of 40 years57,58 less than half by modern standards23,38. Similarly, in chimpanzees the lifespan was estimated at 39.7 years. The maximum longevity of a chimpanzee in the wild is thought to be of a 55 years old female, however it is reported that many live to approximately 40 years of age23,59. We next estimated the lifespan of Denisovans and Neanderthals. We estimated that Denisovans and Neanderthals both had a lifespan of 37.8 years. This suggests that these extinct Hominidae species had similar lifespans to their early human modern-day counterparts.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-54447-w

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, XenoFish said:

I can't remember where I read it from, but I think they used honey on wounds as well. Not sure if I'm correct on that though. 

I have also heard that, it's a widely known natural medicine. Apparently it has wound healing properties, I just googled it but it doesn't say how.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Manwon Lender said:

I have also heard that, it's a widely known natural medicine. Apparently it has wound healing properties, I just googled it but it doesn't say how.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3941901/

Honey has anti-oxidant, anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory properties. It can be used as a wound dressing to promote rapid and improved healing. These effects are due to honey’s anti-bacterial action, secondary to its high acidity, osmotic effect, anti-oxidant content and hydrogen peroxide content. The use of honey leads to improved wound healing in acute cases, pain relief in burn patients and decreased inflammatory response in such patients. However, it has proven to be ineffective in chronic leg ulcers. Overall, studies have been done in favor of the use of honey in medicine.

Edited by XenoFish
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, XenoFish said:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3941901/

Honey has anti-oxidant, anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory properties. It can be used as a wound dressing to promote rapid and improved healing. These effects are due to honey’s anti-bacterial action, secondary to its high acidity, osmotic effect, anti-oxidant content and hydrogen peroxide content. The use of honey leads to improved wound healing in acute cases, pain relief in burn patients and decreased inflammatory response in such patients. However, it has proven to be ineffective in chronic leg ulcers. Overall, studies have been done in favor of the use of honey in medicine.

That's pretty interesting, I am going to have to try it the next time I get a minor cut.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, XenoFish said:

I can't remember where I read it from, but I think they used honey on wounds as well. Not sure if I'm correct on that though. 

Except when it's contaminated itself. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I quite liked the heart beat theory. 

Humans have an average heart rate of around 60 to 70 beats per minute and we live roughly 70 or so years, giving us just over 2 billion beats per life.

Chickens have a faster heart rate of about 275 beats per minute and live only 15 years. On balance, they also have about 2 billion beats.  If we look at it in rough orders of magnitude, there does seem to be a link between living fast and dying young for creatures great and small. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, L.A.T.1961 said:

I quite liked the heart beat theory. 

Humans have an average heart rate of around 60 to 70 beats per minute and we live roughly 70 or so years, giving us just over 2 billion beats per life.

Chickens have a faster heart rate of about 275 beats per minute and live only 15 years. On balance, they also have about 2 billion beats.  If we look at it in rough orders of magnitude, there does seem to be a link between living fast and dying young for creatures great and small. 

 

I have never heard of that before, but that is interesting. I may check it out in more depth as time permits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Piney said:

Except when it's contaminated itself. 

Yea that makes perfect sense, and in the old days it would certainly be much harder to keep it contamination free during storage unlike today.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.