Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
TheAngelofLightness

Angel of Lightness Predictions 2020 decade

207 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

XenoFish
3 minutes ago, ChrLzs said:

Will you put $20 on that, as a bet?

I'll even make it easier - it doesn't have to convince me, but it does have to pass genuine reasonable peer review..  I'll let the moderators decide if that is the case...

But give that the Scientific Method has been around for over a century, I gotta ask why you think it will be 2020 when 'something' happens...

Because it has been foretold in the great internet-o-sphere. :lol:

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Festina

My prediction, well not really a prediction but an observation....51% —49% once again. 

Why is it never 35% 65%?  

Bloomberg Vs. Trump.  New Scandals revealed — perhaps the elevator choke.  Who knows. 

He’s Tall, He’s Short....

But the “dramas” must successively always be more Dramatic than the last Play  keeping the Drama — the law of three — in PLAY.   

The Stage Bard Sage. When, oh when,  the Seven? 

 

 

Edited by Festina

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kenemet
11 hours ago, TheAngelofLightness said:

J.B Rhine, 

You don't help your case by citing very old documents... and in addition, ignoring the problems with the research.  (per the Wikipedia article on Rhine, "It was revealed that Rhine's experiments into extrasensory perception (ESP) contained methodological flaws.[19] The psychologists Leonard Zusne and Warren Jones have written that "the keeping of records in Rhine’s experiments was inadequate. Sometimes, the subject would help with the checking of his or her calls against the order of cards. In some long-distance telepathy experiments, the order of the cards passed through the hands of the percipient before it got from Rhine to the agent.)  

I should also remind you of your predictions on ATS:

Quote

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1227246/pg1 on 12/23/19
Unfortunately I must interrupt briefly my annual vacation to post this since my sense of responsibility does not allow me to ignore what I am perceiving for the effect it may have on many peoples lives.

Again I am feeling insights of a relatively strong seismic event rocking this winter what appears to be the mid-north Atlantic coast of USA and the east coast of Canada.

I think this is going to be above 5 up to 7 or so of magnitude in Richter scale and it will shake buildings on cities like Portland, Boston, Newark, Jersey city, or New York, where this is an extremely rare event.

It may trigger also a Tsunami or high tides along the shaken coast line.

...which members pointed out didn't happen.  Also this one from 12/21/18: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1227029/pg1

Quote

I support this prediction that links astronomical events with seismic performance of the earth, and expect to see on the following week occurring a sequence of extremely important disasters of seismic and volcanic nature on the most active areas between the tectonic plates of Pacific, Atlantic and Indian Oceans.

This may trigger megaquakes on the Indonesian Malaysian region, on the extreme south cone of the America's close to Antartica, on any part of middle Americas and eastern Caribbean, as well as on central and eastern Mediterranean, or on the Indukush, Afghanistan, Iran region.

Please check
Holidays season Probable Seismic wave along the world

How is it that you, a mathematician and involved in the study of waves, don't seem to know the inverse square law an haven't actually calculated how much of a gravitational pull on the Earth that Jupiter has (hint for the uninitiated... I have more of a gravitational pull on the Earth than Jupiter does)

And then there's the thread where you predicted the death/wounding of Maduro (and where you were called out for an incorrect prediction on Chavez: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1225113/pg1

Predicting violence (riots) in the streets on the week of January 12th, 2019 and assassinations in the Caribbean: https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message3954473/pg1?c1=1&c2=1&disclaimer=Continue

;...and of course this prediction: "we are going to see in this transition period between the first and second decade of this XXI Century a strange body coming from the outer space and falling next to an important body of water over which Russia has coasts, it could be the Black Sea, the Azoff sea, even the Caspian or if that is not the case even in the Russian Far East." over on GLP.

You seem to have attracted a lot of criticism from people who check your predictions on the boards where you post them.

You have a predilection for foreseeing dramatic events (earthquakes are always a 6 or 8 and followed by tsunamis, etc) but statistically your "hits" don't seem much better than chance.

We could have a "predict-off" of course.  You match your predictions against others here, with the caveat that they must be specific (no "if not this year then next year" bits)  That might be amusing.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dumbledore the Awesome
12 hours ago, TheAngelofLightness said:

I will come back here again only when real meaningful arguments may be presented through serious replies.  

:( .

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Piney
On 1/30/2020 at 11:51 AM, TheAngelofLightness said:

I work since many years ago in research at Doctoral level,

Did you submit any peer reviewed papers with a sentence structure and misplaced caps like this? I only have a associates and would get reamed if the PhDs found this in my field notes. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stereologist
21 hours ago, TheAngelofLightness said:

Well, Your own way to express disappointment shows clearly how poor is your understanding of all this discussion, the way you articulate your opinions is coming clearly from a really fundamentalistic agenda just right on the path of collision between religious fanatics  and fanatic atheism. 

C. Jung,  J.B Rhine,  J. G. Pratt, L. E. Rhine, D. Pope, H.E. Puthoff, F.J.Evans, C.H.Holland, D.N.O'conell,  were scientist minds that devoted their careers to the serious study of Hypnosis, extransensorial perception, altered states of conciousness and PSI, that was many decades ago if you don't know it.

Check the kind of affiliations they had if you don't trust me,  they were working in the Zurich U., Stanford U., Burghozli Hospital in Switzerland and the labs of  Duke U. and U.Penn in America.   

H.E. Puthoff  leaded a research program that was founded by CIA and DiA agencies at SRI International by the way, and we are talking of a man that got a PhD in EE at Standford, that is the kind of minds that have approached with interest to PSI, and that obviously many of my contradictors here even do not acknowledge at all.  

G. Lozanov (Barcelona, Spain) and A.Caycedo(Varna, Bulgaria) are credited since 1970 through an International scientific conference of to have worked completely independently in very distant places of the world developing an entire new branch on Education and Neurology based on accelerated through application of this same research line that many here only can associate with mambo jumbo. 

It is incredible that when one mention here terms like collective unconscious or subconcious mind there is still on the third decade of the 21 century people absolutely convinced those terms were created by New Age authors, that is crass ignorance in the subject. 

That has nothing to do with Science by the way. 

The Angel of Lightness 

 

Clearly, you have little no idea about the people you referenced. 
 
Consider Columbus. He was on a suicide mission. He was trying to convince people that China was much closer than it is because he falsely believed the Earth was much smaller than it had estimated to be over 1500 years earlier. Lucky for him there was land in the way. He was out of food and water and was going to die had he not encountered land. I doubt you were aware of that.
 
Then you mention Bruno. So what? What did that name have to do with any of your incoherent ramblings? He was burned for his heretical writings and was the last person to be burned at the stake by the Church.
 
Next you mention DaVinci. You apparently are unaware that he was one of the first people to openly write about the biblical Deluge being unlikely. He openly and clearly described the evidence showing that fossils were not due to the Deluge and were not due to Satan. I see no references to DaVinci and the Inquisition. Which Inquisition are you referring to? Are you even aware that there were several?
 
Then you suggest that the Inquisition "brutally repressed and censored" Galileo. So you finally got something right. They put him on house arrest for the last decade of his life. It was science, which was just beginning to be formulated, versus the political power of his day.
 
What does any of this have to do with your incompetence at making predictions? What does any of this have to do with your failures? What does any of this have to do with your extremely poor understanding of the basics of science?
 
I stand by my earlier statements:
 
Quote

You claim that your statements are well written but as we point out they are lacking. You use vague terms. You try to match up common events such as mag 5 quakes with your predictions. You link up ideas with quakes and volcanoes that have no relationship. Astronomical events do NOT affect earthquakes except for possibly some less quakes in oceanic crust. Climate change does not affect quakes (3). You repeatedly try to link in whatever you think is happening in the world of people with geological events (11). That's just plain old woo. 

Your posts show that the following claim of ability is unlikely to be true. Your idea that the actions of people cause nature to lash out is

Your idea that the actions of people cause nature to lash out is one of those bizarre woo  ideas and certainly suggests a strong lack of understanding of even basic science. 

 

I would recommend reworking your predictions to match up with what understanding science has of the world we live in. Drop the woo factor. 

 

I suggest you take a basic course in science and learn something.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stereologist
21 hours ago, TheAngelofLightness said:

Well, Your own way to express disappointment shows clearly how poor is your understanding of all this discussion, the way you articulate your opinions is coming clearly from a really fundamentalistic agenda just right on the path of collision between religious fanatics  and fanatic atheism. 

C. Jung,  J.B Rhine,  J. G. Pratt, L. E. Rhine, D. Pope, H.E. Puthoff, F.J.Evans, C.H.Holland, D.N.O'conell,  were scientist minds that devoted their careers to the serious study of Hypnosis, extransensorial perception, altered states of conciousness and PSI, that was many decades ago if you don't know it.

Check the kind of affiliations they had if you don't trust me,  they were working in the Zurich U., Stanford U., Burghozli Hospital in Switzerland and the labs of  Duke U. and U.Penn in America.   

H.E. Puthoff  leaded a research program that was founded by CIA and DiA agencies at SRI International by the way, and we are talking of a man that got a PhD in EE at Standford, that is the kind of minds that have approached with interest to PSI, and that obviously many of my contradictors here even do not acknowledge at all.  

G. Lozanov (Barcelona, Spain) and A.Caycedo(Varna, Bulgaria) are credited since 1970 through an International scientific conference of to have worked completely independently in very distant places of the world developing an entire new branch on Education and Neurology based on accelerated through application of this same research line that many here only can associate with mambo jumbo. 

It is incredible that when one mention here terms like collective unconscious or subconcious mind there is still on the third decade of the 21 century people absolutely convinced those terms were created by New Age authors, that is crass ignorance in the subject. 

That has nothing to do with Science by the way. 

The Angel of Lightness 

 

More useless babble championing such mistake makers as Rhine and Puthoff. 

Then I see you mention Lozanov. 

I was thinking I had run into Lozanov's name before and yes I have. He is the person that can't seem to state things correctly. He makes up stats. Here he makes up fakes stats on another failed predictor just like he made up stories about how well his method worked and why it worked. 
 
 
Quote

Vanga's admirers regularly insist more than 80 percent of her predictions have come true. According to Baba-Vanga.com (which only publishes information from "highly authoritative sources", FYI), that stat is drawn from 1960s research on her powers conducted by Professor Georgi Lozanov, "former director of the Bulgarian Institute of Suggestology". 

It's no wonder that suggestology passed as just another fad. It fell away some 40 years ago. 

Please continue with your mistakes or better yet learn something by fixing your gross errors.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.