UM-Bot Posted January 23, 2020 #1 Share Posted January 23, 2020 A mysterious figure was recently captured on camera by Washington state's Department of Transportation. https://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/news/334041/bigfoot-shows-up-on-sherman-pass-webcam 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Desertrat56 Posted January 23, 2020 #2 Share Posted January 23, 2020 Looks like someone with red hair and dark clothes running. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acute Posted January 23, 2020 #3 Share Posted January 23, 2020 It's a sasquatch! Get over it. 1 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OverSword Posted January 23, 2020 #4 Share Posted January 23, 2020 Look really carefully and you will detect that there is a reddish color suggesting boots and a vest. It all looks black initially because of the lighting. I give it a 0% chance of being a Sasquatch on the papameter 2 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orphalesion Posted January 23, 2020 #5 Share Posted January 23, 2020 Are we talking about the person in winter clothes walking past the trees? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted January 23, 2020 #6 Share Posted January 23, 2020 Looks a little skinny for a Sasquatch. Could be a kid Sasquatch. Could be a guy in all dark clothes. Let's do it: Papameter: 30% Bigfoot 60% Human 10% Paranormal Shadow Man 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted January 23, 2020 #7 Share Posted January 23, 2020 4 minutes ago, OverSword said: Look really carefully and you will detect that there is a reddish color suggesting boots and a vest. It all looks black initially because of the lighting. I give it a 0% chance of being a Sasquatch on the papameter Actual reading: Papameter: 25% Bigfoot 65% Human 10% Paranormal Shadow Man 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robotic Jew Posted January 23, 2020 #8 Share Posted January 23, 2020 6 minutes ago, OverSword said: Look really carefully and you will detect that there is a reddish color suggesting boots and a vest. It all looks black initially because of the lighting. I give it a 0% chance of being a Sasquatch on the papameter That's gimmick infringement. I expect you'll be hearing from his lawyers soon... 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Hammerclaw Posted January 23, 2020 #9 Share Posted January 23, 2020 Any photo that has to be enhanced or explained to show what you claim it is, is suspect. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guyver Posted January 23, 2020 #10 Share Posted January 23, 2020 Very interesting. The darkness of the image rules out a human in normal clothes IMO. Could be a human in a sasquatch suit, a real sasquatch, or an internet fake as I see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Desertrat56 Posted January 23, 2020 #11 Share Posted January 23, 2020 8 minutes ago, Hammerclaw said: Any photo that has to be enhanced or explained to show what you claim it is, is suspect. I have a question that is off topic for you. Why do you usually (not always) post in bold? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stiff Posted January 23, 2020 #12 Share Posted January 23, 2020 It's just this dude delivering Milk Tray without his ski's... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OverSword Posted January 23, 2020 #13 Share Posted January 23, 2020 (edited) 26 minutes ago, Hammerclaw said: Any photo that has to be enhanced or explained to show what you claim it is, is suspect. I disagree. An example of why is for instance using the emboss tool in Photoshop to enhance a thread that a flying saucer may be suspended from. By that same token using the emboss tool may demonstrate that there is no thread. Edit: Maybe disagree is the wrong thing to say here because any photo of anything paranormal/extra-normal is suspect. But enhancing photos to bring out detail is legitimate Edited January 23, 2020 by OverSword 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
esoteric_toad Posted January 23, 2020 #14 Share Posted January 23, 2020 (edited) Link to the webcam for those that may be interested. Edited January 23, 2020 by esoteric_toad 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flying squid Posted January 23, 2020 #15 Share Posted January 23, 2020 Well, the first thing I noticed when I looked at this picture is the 'large skull' in the snow, It's on the opposite side of the 'sasquatch', across the street, Yeah, I know it's just pareidolia. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Hammerclaw Posted January 23, 2020 #16 Share Posted January 23, 2020 29 minutes ago, Desertrat56 said: I have a question that is off topic for you. Why do you usually (not always) post in bold? Eyesight issues. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Desertrat56 Posted January 23, 2020 #17 Share Posted January 23, 2020 1 minute ago, Hammerclaw said: Eyesight issues. OK. I understand that. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Hammerclaw Posted January 23, 2020 #18 Share Posted January 23, 2020 1 hour ago, OverSword said: Look really carefully and you will detect that there is a reddish color suggesting boots and a vest. It all looks black initially because of the lighting. I give it a 0% chance of being a Sasquatch on the papameter Yeah. All I see is a smudge, then an "enhanced" smudge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OverSword Posted January 23, 2020 #19 Share Posted January 23, 2020 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Hammerclaw said: Yeah. All I see is a smudge, then an "enhanced" smudge. Yes. A smudge with barely perceptible color variations on the lower legs and feet and on the torso. In these areas there is a definite shift to red, but still nearly black. Look really closely at the trailing foot as that is where it's most obvious. Edited January 23, 2020 by OverSword Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Hammerclaw Posted January 23, 2020 #20 Share Posted January 23, 2020 6 minutes ago, OverSword said: Yes. A smudge with barely perceptible color variations on the lower legs and feet and on the torso. In these areas there is a definite shift to red, but still nearly black. There are thousands of trail cam images of wildlife, easily identifiable as bears, deer from all over, wild horses, even, in the Appalachians. Yet, there's not one of a clearly recognizable 600 pound North American anthropoid. It's like looking at grainy, black and white photos of saucers and criptids from '60s tabloids. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OverSword Posted January 23, 2020 #21 Share Posted January 23, 2020 4 minutes ago, Hammerclaw said: There are thousands of trail cam images of wildlife, easily identifiable as bears, deer from all over, wild horses, even, in the Appalachians. Yet, there's not one of a clearly recognizable 600 pound North American anthropoid. It's like looking at grainy, black and white photos of saucers and criptids from '60s tabloids. I didn't say it was a cryptid. What I said was there is a zero percent chance this is a sasquatch. What I'm pointing out that although the lighting makes it difficult to see, in the enhanced version you can tell the person in the photo is wearing boots and a vest that seem to be in the red spectrum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreadLordAvatar Posted January 23, 2020 #22 Share Posted January 23, 2020 Paradolia, it hasn’t moved from picture to picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seti42 Posted January 23, 2020 #23 Share Posted January 23, 2020 Just looks like some dude. In the third photo, it even looks like he has his hood down. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acute Posted January 23, 2020 #24 Share Posted January 23, 2020 2 hours ago, papageorge1 said: Let's do it: Papameter: 30% Bigfoot 60% Human 10% Paranormal Shadow Man 2 hours ago, papageorge1 said: Actual reading: Papameter: 25% Bigfoot 65% Human 10% Paranormal Shadow Man Whoa! Hang on a second..... I have questions: Does the Papameter have two needles, or three dials, or is it a multi-colored bar graph display, or is it numerical? Also..... If it's digital, why are there two different readings above? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted January 23, 2020 #25 Share Posted January 23, 2020 25 minutes ago, acute said: Whoa! Hang on a second..... I have questions: Does the Papameter have two needles, or three dials, or is it a multi-colored bar graph display, or is it numerical? Also..... If it's digital, why are there two different readings above? The Papameter only gives one reading at a time. HOWEVER, new readings can differ from older readings as new information and argumentation is processed. I hope that makes sense. Always go by the more recent post. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now