Two men film alleged 'Bigfoot' in Ohio woods

[stereologist]

One of the creatures that BF people often point to is the coelacanth. It was gone for 66My and yet there it is they tell us. Problem is that the story doesn't match up to BF searching.

1. First off no one was looking for a coelacanth. It was just this strange fish in a market.
2. The coelacanth was known from the fossil record.
3. The coelacanth found today is not the same species as the ones in the fossil record.
4. Plenty more coelacanth have been found today since the discovery of the first one including a second species.

BF on the other hand has never been found either on purpose as part of a search or accidentally as in a victim of a car, forest fire, flood, lightning strike, disease, poisoning, tornado, avalanche, rock fall, extreme cold, hunting, etc. 

 

[The_Phantom_Stranger]

Again, this looks like a person in a suit. There is no way to tell otherwise.

[SKINWALKER19]

stereologist , I sympathise with a great deal of what you have stated , from your point of view Sasquatch cannot exist . 

I believe that vast areas of Canada and the US  and other parts of the globe ,  not easily accessible can harbour Sasquatch/ Bigfoot type bipedal beings that have evaded cataloguing at this time .

We are both equally entitled to our opinion on the given subject matter .

 

[stereologist]

1 hour ago, SKINWALKER19 said:

stereologist , I sympathise with a great deal of what you have stated , from your point of view Sasquatch cannot exist . 

I believe that vast areas of Canada and the US  and other parts of the globe ,  not easily accessible can harbour Sasquatch/ Bigfoot type bipedal beings that have evaded cataloguing at this time .

We are both equally entitled to our opinion on the given subject matter .

 

Of course each of us are entitled to our opinions concerning any subject. I just think that problem is that BF cannot exist where it is reported. You even suggest that it could be out where people are not. Maybe so but that is not where it is reported. And lots of these areas are more visited than people realize. Yet, the real explorers who are out in these areas are not reporting BF.

One of the big mistakes stated by Grover Krantz was that people don't find dead bears in the woods. But that is not true. One of the ways we know about the dead bear finds is that people often think the carcasses are dead humans. The rotted paws look like rotted human hands. People see the 5 digits of the bear and think they have found a dead person. So yes, we do find dead animals in the woods.

What is never found is a dead primate body. 

 

[SKINWALKER19]

Just watched The Man Who Killed Hitler and Then the Bigfoot, the narrative regarding Sasquatch is it carries a virus that threatens humanity and the main character sets out into the Canadian wilderness to track and dispatch poor Bigfoot.

The irony will not be lost in this pandemic time we find ourselves, the movie is B movie material  to say the least LoL