Piney Posted February 27, 2020 #26 Share Posted February 27, 2020 1 hour ago, Damien99 said: So what do you think did they find evidence for PBH’s ? In the tap water????? I thought they were banned. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien99 Posted February 27, 2020 Author #27 Share Posted February 27, 2020 Sorry meant primordial black holes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien99 Posted February 27, 2020 Author #28 Share Posted February 27, 2020 So it is true that primordial black holes evaporating can cause vacuum decay? https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.00773 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien99 Posted February 27, 2020 Author #29 Share Posted February 27, 2020 (edited) So it is true that primordial black holes evaporating can cause vacuum decay? https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.00773 the conclusion states pbh evaporating today can cause it also check this out most powerful explosion is history in universe . possibly it is powerful enough to cause vacuum decay no https://www.google.ca/amp/s/phys.org/news/2020-02-astronomers-biggest-explosion-history-universe.amp https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01291 Edited February 27, 2020 by Damien99 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien99 Posted March 2, 2020 Author #30 Share Posted March 2, 2020 On 2/27/2020 at 12:47 PM, Damien99 said: So it is true that primordial black holes evaporating can cause vacuum decay? https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.00773 the conclusion states pbh evaporating today can cause it also check this out most powerful explosion is history in universe . possibly it is powerful enough to cause vacuum decay no https://www.google.ca/amp/s/phys.org/news/2020-02-astronomers-biggest-explosion-history-universe.amp https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01291 Anyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waspie_Dwarf Posted March 2, 2020 #31 Share Posted March 2, 2020 1 hour ago, Damien99 said: Anyone From the rules (which, once again I suggest you read, they can be found here). Quote 1d. Thread bumping: Do not post 'bump' messages solely to return a thread to the top of the topic index. Please do not do this again. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien99 Posted March 7, 2020 Author #32 Share Posted March 7, 2020 So apparently they have seen these vacuum bubbles now that are causing vacuum decay? https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/939g5p/physicists-are-studying-mysterious-bubbles-of-nothing-that-eat-spacetime https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.01764.pdf#page7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien99 Posted March 7, 2020 Author #33 Share Posted March 7, 2020 https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.space.com/amp/fermi-bubbles-milky-way-radiation-mystery.html https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.livescience.com/amp/64900-space-bubbles-jiggle-through-cosmos.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted March 8, 2020 #34 Share Posted March 8, 2020 On 2/20/2020 at 11:49 AM, Damien99 said: I am still confused about how decay of higgs is not a bad thing You are confused because you refuse to understand the words you are using. Particles decay all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted March 8, 2020 #35 Share Posted March 8, 2020 9 hours ago, Damien99 said: https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.space.com/amp/fermi-bubbles-milky-way-radiation-mystery.html https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.livescience.com/amp/64900-space-bubbles-jiggle-through-cosmos.html Did you even read the articles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien99 Posted March 8, 2020 Author #36 Share Posted March 8, 2020 (edited) 4 hours ago, Rlyeh said: Did you even read the articles? Yes I did and if you read these 2 it makes sense https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/939g5p/physicists-are-studying-mysterious-bubbles-of-nothing-that-eat-spacetime https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.01764.pdf#page7 they seem to have found these bubbles according to above another new article https://www.google.ca/amp/s/futurism.com/theoretical-holes-spacetime-swallow-entire-universe/amp But now, scientists, including the ones behind the new paper, are questioning this conclusion, suggesting that the universe is experiencing a “false vacuum,” and hasn’t truly transitioned to its least excited and most stable state. The result: a “bubble of nothing” that could “‘eat’ all of spacetime, converting it into ‘nothing,'” Marjorie Schillo, lead author from Uppsala University, told Motherboard. Edited March 8, 2020 by Damien99 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted March 8, 2020 #37 Share Posted March 8, 2020 25 minutes ago, Damien99 said: Yes I did and if you read these 2 it makes sense No you didn't read them. The fact they are talking about completely different things proves you didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien99 Posted March 8, 2020 Author #38 Share Posted March 8, 2020 22 minutes ago, Rlyeh said: No you didn't read them. The fact they are talking about completely different things proves you didn't. They talk about bubbles of gas, but what about the new discovery in the recent article and paper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted March 8, 2020 #39 Share Posted March 8, 2020 2 minutes ago, Damien99 said: They talk about bubbles of gas Which has absolutely nothing to do with this topic or the articles you posted an hour ago. 2 minutes ago, Damien99 said: but what about the new discovery in the recent article and paper Quote exactly where they've discovered this false vacuum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien99 Posted March 8, 2020 Author #40 Share Posted March 8, 2020 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Rlyeh said: Which has absolutely nothing to do with this topic or the articles you posted an hour ago. Quote exactly where they've discovered this false vacuum. https://www.google.ca/amp/s/futurism.com/theoretical-holes-spacetime-swallow-entire-universe/amp But now, scientists, including the ones behind the new paper, are questioning this conclusion, suggesting that the universe is experiencing a “false vacuum,” and hasn’t truly transitioned to its least excited and most stable state. The result: a “bubble of nothing” that could “‘eat’ all of spacetime, converting it into ‘nothing,'” Marjorie Schillo, lead author from Uppsala University, told Motherboard. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.01764.pdf#page7 Edited March 8, 2020 by Damien99 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted March 8, 2020 #41 Share Posted March 8, 2020 Just now, Damien99 said: But now, scientists, including the ones behind the new paper, are questioning this conclusion, suggesting that the universe is experiencing a “false vacuum,” and hasn’t truly transitioned to its least excited and most stable state. The result: a “bubble of nothing” that could “‘eat’ all of spacetime, converting it into ‘nothing,'” Marjorie Schillo, lead author from Uppsala University, told Motherboard. I'm not asking for a summary of their hypothesis Where have they said they've DISCOVERED the false vacuum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted March 8, 2020 #42 Share Posted March 8, 2020 (edited) Do you understand their paper is theoretical? You're saying they've seen these bubbles of "nothing", I can't find where they say such a thing. Edited March 8, 2020 by Rlyeh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien99 Posted March 8, 2020 Author #43 Share Posted March 8, 2020 8 minutes ago, Rlyeh said: Do you understand their paper is theoretical? You're saying they've seen these bubbles of "nothing", I can't find where they say such a thing. From my understanding of the paper and the articles that what the are evaluating there results Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted March 8, 2020 #44 Share Posted March 8, 2020 1 minute ago, Damien99 said: From my understanding of the paper and the articles that what the are evaluating there results Your understanding is the problem here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien99 Posted March 8, 2020 Author #45 Share Posted March 8, 2020 10 minutes ago, Rlyeh said: Your understanding is the problem here. What about this But now, scientists, including the ones behind the new paper, are questioning this conclusion, suggesting that the universe is experiencing a “false vacuum,” and hasn’t truly transitioned to its least excited and most stable state. The result: a “bubble of nothing” that could “‘eat’ all of spacetime, converting it into ‘nothing,'” Marjorie Schillo, lead author from Uppsala University, told Motherboard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted March 8, 2020 #46 Share Posted March 8, 2020 Just now, Damien99 said: What about this But now, scientists, including the ones behind the new paper, are questioning this conclusion, suggesting that the universe is experiencing a “false vacuum,” and hasn’t truly transitioned to its least excited and most stable state. The result: a “bubble of nothing” that could “‘eat’ all of spacetime, converting it into ‘nothing,'” Marjorie Schillo, lead author from Uppsala University, told Motherboard. Read it slowly, they have not discovered "bubbles of nothing", they are hypothesizing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien99 Posted March 8, 2020 Author #47 Share Posted March 8, 2020 3 minutes ago, Rlyeh said: Read it slowly, they have not discovered "bubbles of nothing", they are hypothesizing. But now, scientists, including the ones behind the new paper, are questioning this conclusion, suggesting that the universe is experiencing a “false vacuum,” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted March 8, 2020 #48 Share Posted March 8, 2020 12 minutes ago, Damien99 said: But now, scientists, including the ones behind the new paper, are questioning this conclusion, suggesting that the universe is experiencing a “false vacuum,” Yes, hypothesizing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien99 Posted March 8, 2020 Author #49 Share Posted March 8, 2020 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Rlyeh said: Yes, hypothesizing. It does not say hypothetical it says the universe is falling into a false vacuum state? No where does it say hypothetical in the article also dosent hypothetical mean they found a reason to believe that, Edited March 8, 2020 by Damien99 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted March 8, 2020 #50 Share Posted March 8, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Damien99 said: It does not say hypothetical it says the universe is falling into a false vacuum state? No, it says the scientists of the paper are suggesting the universe is in a false vacuum. That's called a hypothesis. Quote No where does it say hypothetical in the article also dosent hypothetical mean they found a reason to believe that, Please find out what a hypothesis is. Your link does call it hypothetical. Edited March 8, 2020 by Rlyeh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now