Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Damien99

Vacuum decay and fine structure constraint

90 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Piney
1 hour ago, Damien99 said:

So what do you think did they find evidence for PBH’s ?

In the tap water????? 

I thought they were banned. :unsure2:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Damien99

Sorry meant primordial black holes 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Damien99

So it is true that primordial black holes evaporating can cause vacuum decay?

https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.00773
 

the conclusion states pbh evaporating today can cause it

 

also check this out most powerful explosion is history in universe . possibly it is powerful enough to cause vacuum decay no 

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/phys.org/news/2020-02-astronomers-biggest-explosion-history-universe.amp

https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01291

Edited by Damien99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Damien99
On 2/27/2020 at 12:47 PM, Damien99 said:

So it is true that primordial black holes evaporating can cause vacuum decay?

https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.00773
 

the conclusion states pbh evaporating today can cause it

 

also check this out most powerful explosion is history in universe . possibly it is powerful enough to cause vacuum decay no 

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/phys.org/news/2020-02-astronomers-biggest-explosion-history-universe.amp

https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01291

Anyone 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Waspie_Dwarf
1 hour ago, Damien99 said:

Anyone 

From the rules (which, once again I suggest you read, they can be found here). 

Quote
  • 1d. Thread bumping: Do not post 'bump' messages solely to return a thread to the top of the topic index.

Please do not do this again.

 

  • Thanks 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rlyeh
On 2/20/2020 at 11:49 AM, Damien99 said:

I am still confused about how decay of higgs is not a bad thing  

You are confused because you refuse to understand the words you are using.  Particles decay all the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rlyeh
Damien99
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Rlyeh said:

Did you even read the articles?

 

Yes I did and if you read these 2 it makes sense

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/939g5p/physicists-are-studying-mysterious-bubbles-of-nothing-that-eat-spacetime
 

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.01764.pdf#page7

they seem to have found these bubbles according to above 

 

another new article 

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/futurism.com/theoretical-holes-spacetime-swallow-entire-universe/amp

But now, scientists, including the ones behind the new paper, are questioning this conclusion, suggesting that the universe is experiencing a “false vacuum,” and hasn’t truly transitioned to its least excited and most stable state. The result: a “bubble of nothing” that could “‘eat’ all of spacetime, converting it into ‘nothing,'” Marjorie Schillo, lead author from Uppsala University, told Motherboard.

Edited by Damien99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rlyeh
25 minutes ago, Damien99 said:

Yes I did and if you read these 2 it makes sense

No you didn't read them.  The fact they are talking about completely different things proves you didn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Damien99
22 minutes ago, Rlyeh said:

No you didn't read them.  The fact they are talking about completely different things proves you didn't.

They talk about bubbles of gas, but what about the new discovery in the recent article and paper

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rlyeh
2 minutes ago, Damien99 said:

They talk about bubbles of gas

Which has absolutely nothing to do with this topic or the articles you posted an hour ago.

 

2 minutes ago, Damien99 said:

but what about the new discovery in the recent article and paper

Quote exactly where they've discovered this false vacuum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Damien99
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Rlyeh said:

Which has absolutely nothing to do with this topic or the articles you posted an hour ago.

 

Quote exactly where they've discovered this false vacuum.

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/futurism.com/theoretical-holes-spacetime-swallow-entire-universe/amp
 

But now, scientists, including the ones behind the new paper, are questioning this conclusion, suggesting that the universe is experiencing a “false vacuum,” and hasn’t truly transitioned to its least excited and most stable state. The result: a “bubble of nothing” that could “‘eat’ all of spacetime, converting it into ‘nothing,'” Marjorie Schillo, lead author from Uppsala University, told Motherboard.

 

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.01764.pdf#page7

Edited by Damien99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rlyeh
Just now, Damien99 said:

But now, scientists, including the ones behind the new paper, are questioning this conclusion, suggesting that the universe is experiencing a “false vacuum,” and hasn’t truly transitioned to its least excited and most stable state. The result: a “bubble of nothing” that could “‘eat’ all of spacetime, converting it into ‘nothing,'” Marjorie Schillo, lead author from Uppsala University, told Motherboard.

I'm not asking for a summary of their hypothesis  Where have they said they've DISCOVERED the false vacuum?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rlyeh
Posted (edited)

Do you understand their paper is theoretical?  You're saying they've seen these bubbles of "nothing", I can't find where they say such a thing.

Edited by Rlyeh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Damien99
8 minutes ago, Rlyeh said:

Do you understand their paper is theoretical?  You're saying they've seen these bubbles of "nothing", I can't find where they say such a thing.

From my understanding of the paper and the articles that what the are evaluating there results 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rlyeh
1 minute ago, Damien99 said:

From my understanding of the paper and the articles that what the are evaluating there results 

Your understanding is the problem here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Damien99
10 minutes ago, Rlyeh said:

Your understanding is the problem here.

What about this 

 

But now, scientists, including the ones behind the new paper, are questioning this conclusion, suggesting that the universe is experiencing a “false vacuum,” and hasn’t truly transitioned to its least excited and most stable state. The result: a “bubble of nothing” that could “‘eat’ all of spacetime, converting it into ‘nothing,'” Marjorie Schillo, lead author from Uppsala University, told Motherboard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rlyeh
Just now, Damien99 said:

What about this 

 

But now, scientists, including the ones behind the new paper, are questioning this conclusion, suggesting that the universe is experiencing a “false vacuum,” and hasn’t truly transitioned to its least excited and most stable state. The result: a “bubble of nothing” that could “‘eat’ all of spacetime, converting it into ‘nothing,'” Marjorie Schillo, lead author from Uppsala University, told Motherboard.

Read it slowly, they have not discovered "bubbles of nothing", they are hypothesizing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Damien99
3 minutes ago, Rlyeh said:

Read it slowly, they have not discovered "bubbles of nothing", they are hypothesizing.

But now, scientists, including the ones behind the new paper, are questioning this conclusion, suggesting that the universe is experiencing a “false vacuum,”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rlyeh
12 minutes ago, Damien99 said:

But now, scientists, including the ones behind the new paper, are questioning this conclusion, suggesting that the universe is experiencing a “false vacuum,”

Yes, hypothesizing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Damien99
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Rlyeh said:

Yes, hypothesizing.

It does not say hypothetical it says the universe is falling into a false vacuum state? No where does it say hypothetical in the article 

also dosent hypothetical mean they found a reason to believe that,

Edited by Damien99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rlyeh
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Damien99 said:

It does not say hypothetical it says the universe is falling into a false vacuum state?

No, it says the scientists of the paper are suggesting the universe is in a false vacuum.  That's called a hypothesis.

 

Quote

No where does it say hypothetical in the article 

also dosent hypothetical mean they found a reason to believe that,

Please find out what a hypothesis is.  Your link does call it hypothetical.

Edited by Rlyeh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.