Duke Wellington Posted April 17, 2020 #51 Share Posted April 17, 2020 5 minutes ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said: Whose army takes orders from Whitehall? All countries armies with the Queen as Head of State. Commissioned officers get their commission from the Monarch not their respective Parliaments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted April 17, 2020 #52 Share Posted April 17, 2020 (edited) 49 minutes ago, Cookie Monster said: All countries armies with the Queen as Head of State. Commissioned officers get their commission from the Monarch not their respective Parliaments. Son, you need to do some research. The Armed Forces of Australia (for example) take their orders from Canberra. Commissions come from the Crown because we’re part of a commonwealth of nations that has the Queen as it’s head. But when she commissions officers here, it is as The Queen of Australia, not the Queen of Britain. Edited April 17, 2020 by Sir Wearer of Hats 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Noteverythingisaconspiracy Posted April 17, 2020 #53 Share Posted April 17, 2020 (edited) 3 hours ago, Cookie Monster said: Erm, they are not fully independent. Our Queen is their Head of State and their armed forces take orders from Whitehall. So when Australian soldiers were the only Commonwealth force to fight in Vietnam they did so because the Queen told them to ? Im pretty sure the Queen is only head of the British armed forces in theory. In reality its the PM who calls the shots, just like in Australia, Canada, New Zealand etc. We have a similar system in my country. Edited April 17, 2020 by Noteverythingisaconspiracy Changed your name once again I see. I probably woulnt have bothered to respond if I knew it was you Rabid Mongoose. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duke Wellington Posted April 17, 2020 #54 Share Posted April 17, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said: Son, you need to do some research. The Armed Forces of Australia (for example) take their orders from Canberra. Commissions come from the Crown because we’re part of a commonwealth of nations that has the Queen as it’s head. But when she commissions officers here, it is as The Queen of Australia, not the Queen of Britain. 1 hour ago, Noteverythingisaconspiracy said: So when Australian soldiers were the only Commonwealth force to fight in Vietnam they did so because the Queen told them to ? Im pretty sure the Queen is only head of the British armed forces in theory. In reality its the PM who calls the shots, just like in Australia, Canada, New Zealand etc. We have a similar system in my country. Our collective Parliaments are lower chambers which dont have the authority to declare war or issue instructions to our respective armed forces. Should one of our states wish to go to war or undertake military action then the relevant Lower Chamber(s) vote on it, and if the vote passes it then goes to their Upper Chambers. The Upper Chambers are headed by the Monarch (or an official appointed on her behalf that reports back to her and seeks rulings from her). It is the Monarchs sole prerogative if one of our states go to war or undertakes military action. Our armed forces do not answer to Lower Chambers, they take their orders from the Monarch. They swear their allegiance to the Monarch (not their states Lower Chamber) and the Monarchy contrary to how she is portrayed holds full executive power. She tells the lower chambers if they can launch action and her ruling is final. The Queen has used her powers several times during her reign (contrary to popular belief). For instance she has sacked an Australian Prime Minster and Cabinet Minsters before. While she normally takes a back seat she is our checks and measures, and does intervene where appropriate. She told the UK Labour Party headed by Tony Blair to get lost when he tried to get dictator powers. Until the day that countries like Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, decide to remove the Monarch as Head of State via a referendum and replace it with an elected President then the Monarch holds full Executive Power. Should a Presidency emerge then it would then be the President that makes the decisions a Queen or King would. Australia, Canada, and New Zealand answer to the Queen not an elected president. Whenever the UK goes to war you will notice that Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, also send forces. This is because Whitehall with permission from the Monarch coordinates collection military actions from our states. The Queen tells them they all have too. Those three countries are not part of the empire anymore, they have moved beyond Dominion status too, they are 95% fully autonomous with the other 5% being them all answering to the same Head of State. A Monarch which retains command over our armed forces, can dissolve Parliaments, can sack PMs and Cabinet Ministers, can actually appoint who she wants too, who signs laws off before they become legislation, and should the need ever arise can actually dissolve states by moving their Government control back to Westminster. Should one of our states ever end up with a tyrant in control who wants to take their issues out on their population then you will be thankful for having a Monarch who would block it. Edited April 17, 2020 by Cookie Monster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jodie.Lynne Posted April 17, 2020 #55 Share Posted April 17, 2020 On 4/11/2020 at 8:38 PM, Noteverythingisaconspiracy said: Yes it might come as a shock that Noteverythingisaconspiracy is not my real name. >sigh< another one of my illusions shattered... 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Noteverythingisaconspiracy Posted April 17, 2020 #56 Share Posted April 17, 2020 10 minutes ago, Jodie.Lynne said: >sigh< another one of my illusions shattered... Sorry. Its just that Noteverythingisaconspiracy is rather long for everyday use. Jakob is a lot more convenient. Yes its spelled with a k, not a c. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted April 17, 2020 #57 Share Posted April 17, 2020 11 hours ago, Cookie Monster said: Our collective Parliaments are lower chambers which dont have the authority to declare war or issue instructions to our respective armed forces. Should one of our states wish to go to war or undertake military action then the relevant Lower Chamber(s) vote on it, and if the vote passes it then goes to their Upper Chambers. The Upper Chambers are headed by the Monarch (or an official appointed on her behalf that reports back to her and seeks rulings from her). It is the Monarchs sole prerogative if one of our states go to war or undertakes military action. Our armed forces do not answer to Lower Chambers, they take their orders from the Monarch. They swear their allegiance to the Monarch (not their states Lower Chamber) and the Monarchy contrary to how she is portrayed holds full executive power. She tells the lower chambers if they can launch action and her ruling is final. The Queen has used her powers several times during her reign (contrary to popular belief). For instance she has sacked an Australian Prime Minster and Cabinet Minsters before. While she normally takes a back seat she is our checks and measures, and does intervene where appropriate. She told the UK Labour Party headed by Tony Blair to get lost when he tried to get dictator powers. Until the day that countries like Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, decide to remove the Monarch as Head of State via a referendum and replace it with an elected President then the Monarch holds full Executive Power. Should a Presidency emerge then it would then be the President that makes the decisions a Queen or King would. Australia, Canada, and New Zealand answer to the Queen not an elected president. Whenever the UK goes to war you will notice that Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, also send forces. This is because Whitehall with permission from the Monarch coordinates collection military actions from our states. The Queen tells them they all have too. Those three countries are not part of the empire anymore, they have moved beyond Dominion status too, they are 95% fully autonomous with the other 5% being them all answering to the same Head of State. A Monarch which retains command over our armed forces, can dissolve Parliaments, can sack PMs and Cabinet Ministers, can actually appoint who she wants too, who signs laws off before they become legislation, and should the need ever arise can actually dissolve states by moving their Government control back to Westminster. Should one of our states ever end up with a tyrant in control who wants to take their issues out on their population then you will be thankful for having a Monarch who would block it. I think you’ll find that they swear to obey The Queen of Australia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_Allegiance_(Australia) and Big Betty can’t sack anyone, she’s a representative monarch, not one with any actual power. She dissolved that power to the Governor General. Now, form and ritual have “require regnal consent” as part of the desolution and instigation of parliament, tis true, but it’s rubber stamp business for Big Bet, she has no right nor power to say “no”. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim Reaper 6 Posted April 17, 2020 #58 Share Posted April 17, 2020 On 4/16/2020 at 12:08 PM, RoofGardener said: Hmm.. if 666 is the NUMBER of his name, then.. what is his ALPHANUMERIC name ? It would be FFF or Frightening Fricken Fellow! Peace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jodie.Lynne Posted April 17, 2020 #59 Share Posted April 17, 2020 9 minutes ago, Noteverythingisaconspiracy said: Sorry. Its just that Noteverythingisaconspiracy is rather long for everyday use. Jakob is a lot more convenient. Yes its spelled with a k, not a c. I have to admit that 'Jakob' is easier to yell out, at "THAT" moment, than "Noteverythingisaconspiracy"! 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmccr8 Posted April 18, 2020 #60 Share Posted April 18, 2020 4 hours ago, Jodie.Lynne said: I have to admit that 'Jakob' is easier to yell out, at "THAT" moment, than "Noteverythingisaconspiracy"! Hi Jodie Try singing it. jmccr8 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoofGardener Posted April 18, 2020 #61 Share Posted April 18, 2020 9 hours ago, Jodie.Lynne said: I have to admit that 'Jakob' is easier to yell out, at "THAT" moment, than "Noteverythingisaconspiracy"! An interesting observation, @Jodie.Lynne. 1) "ZOMG.... Jakob... DUCK" <woosh> 2) "ZOMG... Noteverthingisacon<THWACK>.... oh never mind" 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Noteverythingisaconspiracy Posted April 18, 2020 #62 Share Posted April 18, 2020 (edited) 7 hours ago, jmccr8 said: Hi Jodie Try singing it. jmccr8 It is possible. Its an old lullaby. Edited April 18, 2020 by Noteverythingisaconspiracy This is totally on topic right ? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Phantom_Stranger Posted April 18, 2020 #63 Share Posted April 18, 2020 (edited) I think it is an exaggeration to call any one man the Man the Beast. I think the number comes through every man like a man. Like how there are many antichrists and the Antichrist comes through everyone. It's always been around dealing with currency by example from Ceasar's coinage to today. It's like a reflection of the Beast onto many men throughout all human history. Edited April 18, 2020 by Green Wasp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Smoke aLot Posted April 18, 2020 #64 Share Posted April 18, 2020 We are in very fruitful days of this subject. Almost every 'presentation' about it now includes references to 5G network, chemtrails etc. It kinda kills every decent discussion even before it starts But luckily we have UM and sarcasm helps too. If devil exists then beast surely is not thing of past but something left for future. This connected world (it's easy to learn about people whom you never met) plus future plans to replace cash with electronic system with ID's (already testing in some place in Sweden, if i am correct about it) do make room for some interesting theories. Then there is talk about this corona vaccine which might include nano rfid tag thingy, hopefully it's BS tho. Some parts of scriptures are really easy to connect with what is happening and what might happen in future. Personally i feel that more references fit in future than in the past. But as said in OP, where is satan is good question indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now