Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
UM-Bot

Bigfoot bakes cookies in weird house listing

Recommended Posts

 
the13bats

Hey, its all about showmanship.

The best part is how bad this costume makes the patterson film look.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OverSword
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, the13bats said:

Hey, its all about showmanship.

The best part is how bad this costume makes the patterson film look.

How does this costume make a fifty year old piece of film look bad?  It looks nothing like the film at all.  I'd say the film makes this costume look bad...:yes:

Edited by OverSword
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
freetoroam

Ok believers ..

This is not a real bigfoot, but it could well be the same costume used out in the woods. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the13bats
25 minutes ago, OverSword said:

How does this costume make a fifty year old piece of film look bad?  It looks nothing like the film at all. 

Correct, the obvious costume in the realtor video is head and shoulders, feet too, better than the costume patterson used so it makes the pgf look bad...

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OverSword
Just now, the13bats said:

Correct, the obvious costume in the realtor video is head and shoulders, feet too, better than the costume patterson used so it makes the pgf look bad...

Head and shoulders is a brand of shampoo. :lol:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the13bats
5 minutes ago, OverSword said:

Head and shoulders is a brand of shampoo. :lol:

And an old expression, either way the costume in this fun video blows away the crap patterson used.

 

Definition of head and shoulders

: beyond comparison : by far head and shoulders above the competition

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jethrofloyd

Well, Bill Munns said in his analysis/report there is no chance PGF is a man in a costume. I believe him. :yes:

http://www.themunnsreport.com/

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Piney
7 minutes ago, jethrofloyd said:

Well, Bill Munns said in his analysis/report there is no chance PGF is a man in a costume. I believe him. :yes:

 

I don't. :yes:

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the13bats
13 minutes ago, jethrofloyd said:

Well, Bill Munns said in his analysis/report there is no chance PGF is a man in a costume. I believe him. :yes:

http://www.themunnsreport.com/

Munns needs to prove it was really a bigfoot not manipulate his analysis to show he doesnt believe its a man in a suit, no real scientists take his work seriously.

munns imho he is a pompous, biased,  profiteering, attention seeker who fools people into thinking he has some great or any for that matter expertise in a subject that by definition there are no experts.

To me munns is like meldrum theirs egos so big and fragile if pattersons widow handed them the outtakes and blooper reels while gimlin danced the hoky poky wearing the suit they would still say they are right the film is a real creature.

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Piney
1 minute ago, the13bats said:

 no real scientists take his work seriously.

Because it's obviously a man in a suit. :yes:

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jethrofloyd
8 minutes ago, Piney said:

Because it's obviously a man in a suit. :yes:

Prove it, Piney. :yes:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
ParanormalConfidante
34 minutes ago, Piney said:

Because it's obviously a man in a suit. :yes:

Yes. Prove it, Piney ;) what if it's the real thing hahah

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Piney
38 minutes ago, jethrofloyd said:

Prove it, Piney. :yes:

Loggers and ranch outriders move better in the bush than that clumsy thing did.

13 minutes ago, ParanormalConfidante said:

Yes. Prove it, Piney ;) what if it's the real thing hahah

See above.

Also look at the bottoms of the feet.

Crocs weren't invented for Bigfoot yet. .....or it didn't have toes... 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ParanormalConfidante

Will someone say that Cookie Monster was a Big Foot too? or does it need to be me? lol:lol:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the13bats
2 hours ago, ParanormalConfidante said:

Will someone say that Cookie Monster was a Big Foot too? or does it need to be me? lol:lol:

Come to think of it, did CM have feet?

  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NorthenerON

Is that not the Bigfoot from that jerky commercial. Good to see he's still getting work in these troubling times.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the13bats
16 hours ago, NorthenerON said:

Is that not the Bigfoot from that jerky commercial. Good to see he's still getting work in these troubling times.

It looks like a commercial cheaper version of that costume,

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SKINWALKER19

Why hasn’t the Philip Morris suit been extensively examined, filmed on the same camera and film and subjected to utmost ( scrutiny) by all ................. because it doesn’t stand up to scrutiny as it wasn’t in the Patterson/ Gimlin film of 1967! 

Inter dimensional  bipedal beings roaming the earth with telepathic senses , maybe that’s why they remain so aloof .Cryptozoology has many other entities that remain unexplainable. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the13bats
2 hours ago, SKINWALKER19 said:

Why hasn’t the Philip Morris suit been extensively examined, filmed on the same camera and film and subjected to utmost ( scrutiny) by all ................. because it doesn’t stand up to scrutiny as it wasn’t in the Patterson/ Gimlin film of 1967! 

Inter dimensional  bipedal beings roaming the earth with telepathic senses , maybe that’s why they remain so aloof .Cryptozoology has many other entities that remain unexplainable. 

Sure, morris old and bored made claims he couldnt back up, but that far from proves that the costume patterson used isnt a costume,

Dear true believers either ignore or are ignorant to facts, being there was and never will be any way to prove the cameea speed, pattersons speed and angle in relation to his actors speed and angle,  to make claims otherwise is simple not scientific and isnt evidence or proof.

For every bigfoot "expert" who beats their fits that just cant be a man in a cheap fur suit their are real trained researchers who do analyze the pgf and quickly show that there is nothing that cant be reproduced by a man in a fur suit,

Another problem is, look how great the creature looks in this realtors pictures, we see great details, enough that i believe its a version of the jack links costume,

in addition the horrible film resolution of the pgf, the actor is just a tiny percent in unedited versions of the pgf, and when self appointed experts like M. K. Davis or B. Munns claim they enlarged and enhanced the film, which btw they were not working with orginals, many claim to but no, they are using copies, and when they make ridiculous claims of enhancements show things ranging from muscle movments to facial expression their credibiliry ends because enhancentment cant bring out something that isnt there, they see what they want to see.

No man can walk like the pgf creature, wrong, even krantz a believer in bigfoot and supporter of the film would jump up and walk just like the creature, when realising he just shot himself in the foot his disclaimer would be to the reflect, i didnt walk like the creature very far,

No man is built like the pgf creature, not true humans vary and builds and body shapes and sizes, many men and a few women have the same build,

There are almost countless threads on here outlining the patterson hoax, please do go kick start one as they are stagnant as the subject of the patrerson film hoax is well debunked and played out.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
openozy
On 5/22/2020 at 8:29 AM, NorthenerON said:

Is that not the Bigfoot from that jerky commercial

Yes,that's what BF is,a person in fancy dress :lol:

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.