Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Kamala Harris Told Jacob Blake


itsnotoutthere

Recommended Posts

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) told Jacob Blake Jr. on Monday that she is “proud of him and how he is working through his pain,” according to attorney Benjamin Crump, who represents the Blake family.

Blake was shot seven times from behind in a confrontation with Kenosha, Wisconsin, police on Aug. 23. He was wounded and paralyzed from the waist down. The incident sparked local riots, and Blake became the latest victim to be championed by the Black Lives Matter movement.

At the time of the confrontation, there was a warrant for Blake’s arrest for “third-degree sexual assault, trespassing and disorderly conduct,” according to the Associated Press. A knife was found in his car, Wisconsin authorities later revealed.

https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/09/07/kamala-harris-told-jacob-blake-she-was-proud-of-him-sexual-assault/

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The irony is that his Third Degree Sexual Assault charge is that he is claimed to have "Grabbed her by the <censored>".  If he were a few shades more orange- he  could have been President.  (Might have to read about the Ivana Trump assault for more background)

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 4
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gromdor said:

The irony is that his Third Degree Sexual Assault charge is that he is claimed to have "Grabbed her by the <censored>".  If he were a few shades more orange- he  could have been President.  (Might have to read about the Ivana Trump assault for more background)

And trump wished that Epstein lady well, but yeah its okay if trump befriends sex crime people.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, the13bats said:

And trump wished that Epstein lady well, but yeah its okay if trump befriends sex crime people.

Think you'll find the Clintons were his regulars.

Edited by itsnotoutthere
  • Like 4
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, itsnotoutthere said:

Think you'll find the Clintons were his regulars.

And trump was his buddy.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty common knowledge that Trump, Clinton, and Epstein were all buddies.  It's also interesting to note that all three have sexual assault allegations.  Birds of a feather hanging together and all that.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great!  This is just the beginning.  A perspective VP candidate is out there praising criminals.  Basically saying that a Biden Administration does not care about the law abiding citizens.  They will cater to the criminal element to build up that CNSF that will use terror to keep the people in line.  They are blatantly obvious.  They no longer try to hide their agenda.  And they are sorely underestimating the Silent Majority.

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems you're leaving out the fact that Trump barred Epstein from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club because?

Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club.

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/08/posts-distort-facts-on-jacob-blake-charges/

So he was accused of it. And the same people who freak out thinking ANYBODY could be accused of sexual assault at any time for any reason and have their lives ruined...are the same guys who are perfectly okay with such an accusation leading to a black guy getting shot seven times in the back.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Robotic Jew said:

Also...what happened to innocent until proven guilty?

 

3 minutes ago, Autochthon1990 said:

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/08/posts-distort-facts-on-jacob-blake-charges/

So he was accused of it. And the same people who freak out thinking ANYBODY could be accused of sexual assault at any time for any reason and have their lives ruined...are the same guys who are perfectly okay with such an accusation leading to a black guy getting shot seven times in the back.

 

The accusation didn't get Blake shot, resisting arrest did. It was entirely his choice on the actions he took that day. He could've allowed himself to be arrested on the warrant and had his day in court.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Idk why everyone is talking about the sexual assault charges 

He was shot for reaching for a weapon/looking like he was reaching for a weapon when cops had guns pointed at him.

No other reason.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Robotic Jew said:

Also...what happened to innocent until proven guilty?

Well, if you don't obey an officer's commands and then and you "go for" a weapon (even a knife is lethal at that range).  What do you think the outcome is going to be?

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Buzz_Light_Year said:

 

The accusation didn't get Blake shot, resisting arrest did. It was entirely his choice on the actions he took that day. He could've allowed himself to be arrested on the warrant and had his day in court.

It wasn't even resiting arrest the got him shot. Resiting arrest got his tazed.

Reaching for a weapon/looking like he was reaching for a weapon is what got him shot.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, spartan max2 said:

Idk why everyone is talking about the sexual assault charges 

He was shot for reaching for a weapon/looking like he was reaching for a weapon when cops had guns pointed at him.

No other reason.

The cops were called because he went back after his assault victim harrassing her and her kids even though there was a restraining order against him. He wasn't supposed to be near her. 

Edited by susieice
  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, susieice said:

The cops were called because he went back after his assault victim harrassing her and her kids even though there was a restraining order against him.

I know. I was just pointing out that what caused him to get shot, and therefore legally justified the police shooting, was him reaching for a weapon/looking like he was reaching for a weapon.

I just pointed that out because of the earlier comments in the thread.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, spartan max2 said:

He was shot for reaching for a weapon/looking like he was reaching for a weapon when cops had guns pointed at him.

He was shot because the nazi officer was in the mood to do so.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, toast said:

He was shot because the nazi officer was in the mood to do so.

Sure took him a while to get in the mood. :rolleyes:

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have nothing against  actions of copa here, he started the chain of events that got him killed. only virtue signaling liberal would not see it , but then we get this. 

https://news.yahoo.com/officer-shoots-13-old-boy-151736318.html

it makes  it  harder to give cops benefit of the doubt, 

 as a result we get something like this. https://news.yahoo.com/police-chief-stabbed-face-ice-192547730.html

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Buzz_Light_Year said:

Seems you're leaving out the fact that Trump barred Epstein from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club because?

Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club.

An underaged daughter of a paying member.  When did he ban ban Ghislaine Maxwell, btw?  Asking because she "recruited" at least one other girl from there: Virginia Roberts Giuffre.  Ghislaine Maxwell, recruited her into Epstein's sex trafficking operation when she worked as a locker room attendant at Mar-a-Lago in 1999, when she was 15.  We also know that Epstein partied there with Trump from at least 1992-2008 (when he was banned).  So he only has access for a mere 16 years or so.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently this isn't all she did. According to the Daily Mail, she recently did an interview. In it she refered to the Harris Administration.Then she back tracked and said Joe Biden would be in charge. Yeah right.The plan is Biden got told to pick her by someone. I personally would have prefered Stacey Abrams, but not voting for joe. Anyhow, it's like I and other people are posting.The plan is for Biden to pick Kamala Harris.joe will serve maybe a year or two as president  and then resign  as president due to health reasons..Harris now becomes president.Now she has to pick a vice president. If I can recall my government classes, the Speaker of the House is supposed to be the next vp. However, I think Harris will bypass  Nancy Pelosi, and instead choose AOC (Alexandria Ortiz-Cortez) .Thus it will provide an opportunity for  the leftist democrates and communists to run the country. Apparently Biden doesn't have that big a support amongst latinos as everyone thinks. Saw on the local news someone asked him about their support, and he mumbled they have to work on that. Hispanics aren't stupid, and neither are a lot of blacks, who are supporting Trump instead. Harris is just as power hungry and mad as Hilary Clinton. Saw where she wants a job in Joe's administration.However, if Hilary thinks that Harris would make her a VP if Biden resigns, she's got another thing coming.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, HollyDolly said:

if Hilary thinks that Harris would make her a VP if Biden resigns, she's got another thing coming.

I agree, this possibility has pretty much zero odds of happening, but stranger things can happen.  It’s scary to think about.  Within months of winning the election, Biden will only serve a few months.  His cognitive abilities are failing fast.  I saw this very same decline in my father and in a few years, he was dead.  The Socialist handlers know this too.  And they will have no compunction of executing the 25th Amendment and instill Harris as President (she's already calling it the Harris Administration).  Then for some reason, she selects Hilary as VP.  And because the Bilderbergs had promised Hilary the Presidency after Obama, Kamala will step down.  This is the nightmare of all nightmares.  I think it unlikely, but it is still within the realm of possibility. 

I know an easy way to ensure this doesn’t happen; let’s just reelect Trump.  But then we will need to fight through the coming coup.  We really need to watch groups like Transition Integrity Project and Defeat Disinfo.  Rule one is to not talk about the coup and rule two is, if you do then blame it on Trump.  Hilary has already been talking about the coup.  Podesta is involved in these groups.  The Left will ramp up their gaslighting and projecting.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/8/2020 at 1:32 PM, RavenHawk said:

And they are sorely underestimating the Silent Majority.

I agree and I think it will be their undoing.  They really don't seem to grasp that anyone would come against them.  

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.