Loch Ness 2004 what is that in the Loch

[johncbdg]

More of the Mysterious and unexplained Phenomenon of Nessie in Loch Ness.

 

 

[ThereWeAreThen]

Not really much to go on.

[psyche101]

Water.

There's definitely water in that clip. 

[ThereWeAreThen]

3 minutes ago, psyche101 said:

Water.

There's definitely water in that clip. 

Where's your evidence to support such a claim? 

[psyche101]

Just now, ThereWeAreThen said:

Where's your evidence to support such a claim? 

I'm going with the quantity and quality of the water in the video .......

[onlookerofmayhem]

31 minutes ago, psyche101 said:

I'm going with the quantity and quality of the water in the video .......

Don't forget the amazing consistency of the water.

[ThereWeAreThen]

6 minutes ago, onlookerofmayhem said:

Don't forget the amazing consistency of the water.

 Pareidolia. 

[johncbdg]

Great replys from the under 5s at the new kids school....

[ThereWeAreThen]

6 minutes ago, johncbdg said:

Great replys from the under 5s at the new kids school....

What else do you expect us to say? There b***** all to go on fella. 

Fine, its undeniable proof that nessie exists.

[onlookerofmayhem]

5 minutes ago, johncbdg said:

Great replys from the under 5s at the new kids school....

What other reaction would you like for a 30 second video of a handful of pictures that, for the most part, show absolutely nothing of interest?

And the only thing a viewer may be looking at in one of the pictures is a tiny, blurry, splotchy unrecognizable spot.

The pictures are horrible. 

Why even bother speculating what it may or may not be?

It's literally impossible to make any kind of identification possible. 

[johncbdg]

7 minutes ago, onlookerofmayhem said:

What other reaction would you like for a 30 second video of a handful of pictures that, for the most part, show absolutely nothing of interest?

And the only thing a viewer may be looking at in one of the pictures is a tiny, blurry, splotchy unrecognizable spot.

The pictures are horrible. 

Why even bother speculating what it may or may not be?

It's literally impossible to make any kind of identification possible. 

Gives us some thing to do i like to get out and about now that beats the **** out posting silly replys you need to get out more and try some thing new..

And  identification at loch ness with it being 23 miles long and around 1 mile wide is hard to get if what ever shows up is only there a second or two but it is a big loch and plenty room for you to show us all what you can do....

[onlookerofmayhem]

2 minutes ago, johncbdg said:

you need to get out more and try some thing new..

How presumptuous of you...

2 minutes ago, johncbdg said:

And  identification at loch ness with it being 23 miles long and around 1 mile wide is hard to get if what ever shows up is only there a second or two but it is a big loch

That's your problem, not mine.

The video of still photos you posted is useless garbage. 

4 minutes ago, johncbdg said:

plenty room for you to show us all what you can do....

Well, I'm certainly not going to travel to Loch Ness from New Jersey.

I don't believe there is a "monster" there and so I don't particularly care to waste my time trying to prove there is.

[Myles]

7 hours ago, johncbdg said:

More of the Mysterious and unexplained Phenomenon of Nessie in Loch Ness.

 

 

I lived on a lake for several years and my father still does.  If there was a story that there was a creature in the lake, I could get many pics that look something like this.   Many times a partially submerged tree branch will look like something else.  Many times a large fish comes to the surface and makes odd wakes.  

Edited October 1, 2020 by Myles

[the13bats]

9 hours ago, johncbdg said:

Gives us some thing to do i like to get out and about now that beats the **** out posting silly replys you need to get out more and try some thing new

Out and about? Seems you are right here scolding people.

I found most of the replies very humorous guess i get to be in the pre 5 group, im good with that they have more fun it would seem

[psyche101]

11 hours ago, johncbdg said:

Great replys from the under 5s at the new kids school....

Should have got them to start the thread maybe. Might have been a bit better. 

[TashaMarie]

This mystery was solved years ago. 

[jethrofloyd]

Usless photos.

Can somebody do same as in the Simpson episode 'Loch Ness Monster'? And drain that 'damn' lake. 

[Skepticalracoon]

7 hours ago, jethrofloyd said:

Usless photos.

Can somebody do same as in the Simpson episode 'Loch Ness Monster'? And drain that 'damn' lake. 

My time has finally came.

 

 

Edited October 4, 2020 by Skepticalracoon
Typo

[Skepticalracoon]

On 10/1/2020 at 8:22 AM, johncbdg said:

Gives us some thing to do i like to get out and about now that beats the **** out posting silly replys you need to get out more and try some thing new..

And  identification at loch ness with it being 23 miles long and around 1 mile wide is hard to get if what ever shows up is only there a second or two but it is a big loch and plenty room for you to show us all what you can do....

For the sake of discussion do you mind sharing what you think is in the pictures above, and what details or logic you are using to support your theory in the pictures? 
 

 

[johncbdg]

On 10/1/2020 at 2:14 PM, Myles said:

I lived on a lake for several years and my father still does.  If there was a story that there was a creature in the lake, I could get many pics that look something like this.   Many times a partially submerged tree branch will look like something else.  Many times a large fish comes to the surface and makes odd wakes.  

Yes and like the UFOs we can see many strange things in the sky but if we can not name them then they are UFOs i would love you to show us the many pictures you say you could take and yes name it as what it is you must set some time aside and do this..

[johncbdg]

On 10/4/2020 at 8:34 PM, Skepticalracoon said:

For the sake of discussion do you mind sharing what you think is in the pictures above, and what details or logic you are using to support your theory in the pictures? 
 

 

If you are talking about video then i do not have a clue to what that was...

[Sir Wearer of Hats]