Paranoid Android Posted March 27, 2022 #776 Share Posted March 27, 2022 On 3/27/2022 at 1:06 AM, Golden Duck said: Actually there was doubt about the signature. I've read an FBI expert says it's authentic; but, layman analysis indicates it might not have been accepted for a mail in ballot. So the expert analysis from FBI say it's authentic. But a layman (presumably you know the definition of "layman" precludes expertise) says it might not have passed muster in a mail-in ballot. No citation for who this layman is who made this laymans assertion, nor is there an indication of whether this is a prevailing layman opinion that most layman who man polling stations would agree, or whether it's 1-2 out of a 1000 layman would question it (or somewhere between these two extremes)..... in short there is so much wrong with this one paragraph I really have no idea where to begin in addressing it. Is this what we are using as "evidence" these days? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now