Golden Duck Posted March 28, 2022 #801 Share Posted March 28, 2022 (edited) 24 minutes ago, Paranoid Android said: To quote your post: there was doubt about the signature - admitting doubt about a signature. I've read an FBI expert says it's authentic - One side of the story but - there is a "but", because obviously there is an alternative view, which states: layman analysis indicates it might not have been accepted for a mail in ballot - offering an alternative involving layman opinions, suggesting that this alternative is an equally valid approach to the signature. If I'm missing something, by all means elaborate. Because otherwise, a plain reading of the text you wrote suggests that you used the layman opinion on the signature as a relevant reason to dismiss the account. Not at all. It suggest that some laymen may not be satisfied with the opinion of an expert in signatures. However, a laymen is often called on to inspect opinions. Accordingly, it's a waste of time presenting comparative signatures here, because - as far as I know - noone in this forum had claimed to be an expert on signatures. A reasonable person knows a layman's opinion never takes primacy over an experts. However, you seem far from disinterested since you're demanding to see sample of public opinion that you won't accept. Edited March 28, 2022 by Golden Duck 1 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now